Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Roach
No. 695. Great Northern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Anna Roach, as Administratrix, etc. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Argued January 29, 1917. Decided February 5, 1917.
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. No. 64. Argued November 3, 1916. Decided February 5, 1917. Following the cour
Second National Bank v. First National Bank
SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OKEANA, OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP CINCINNATI, STATE OP OHIO. No. 491. Argued January 25, 1917. Decided February 5, 1917. When the highest state .court has refuse
Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
No. 378. Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and City of Richmond. In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Motion to dismiss submitted January 15, 1917.
Ex parte of St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad Company. Submitted January 15, 1917. Decided January 22, 1917.
Board of Trustees of the Sevilleta De La Joya Grant v. Board of Trustees of the Belen Land Grant
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SEVILLETA DE LA JOYA GRANT, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OWNERS IN COMMON THEREOF, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BELEN LAND GRANT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW MEXICO. No. 129. Argued December 22, 1916. De
Herbert v. Shanley Co.
HERBERT ET AL. v. THE SHANLEY COMPANY. JOHN CHURCH COMPANY v. HILLIARD HOTEL COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO , THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 427, 433. Argued January 10, 1917. Decided January 22, 1917. The performan
Merrick v. N. W. Halsey & Co.
MERRICK ET AL. v. N. W. HALSEY & COMPANY ET AL., AND THE WEIS FIBRE CONTAINER CORPORATION. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 413. Argued October 16, 17, 1916. Decided January 22, 1
Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co.
CALDWELL, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA AND EX OFFICIO MEMBER OF THE STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, ET AL. v. SIOUX FALLS STOCK YARDS COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED
Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.
HALL, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS AND BANKING OF THE STATE OF OHIO v. GEIGER-JONES COMPANY. HALL, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS AND BANKING OF THE STATE OF OHIO v. COULTRAP. HALL, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS AND BANKING OF THE STATE OF OHIO ET AL. v. ROS
United States v. American-Asiatic Steamship Co.
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN-ASIATIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES v. PRINCE LINE, LIMITED, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 138, 169. Motions to reverse and reman
Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Bryan
No. 651. The Arizona Eastern Railroad Company and Epes Randolph and L. H. Manning, its Sureties, Plaintiffs in Error, v. W. N. Bryan. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona. Motion to dismiss or affirm or place on the summary
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Mulligan
No. 564. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Elizabeth A. Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of W. E. Mulligan, Deceased. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. Motion to dismiss or aff
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Mims
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. MIMS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF MIMS. ERROR to the supreme court op the state op south CAROLINA. No. 242. Argued December 4, 1916. Decided January 15, 1917. This court is without jurisdiction to review a judg
Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago
THOMAS CUSACK COMPANY v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 126. Argued December 20, 21, 1916. Decided January 15, 1917. The Fifth Amendment relates to national action only. , A city ordinance, w
Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.
VON BAUMBACH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. SARGENT LAND COMPANY. VON BAUMBACH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. SUTTON LAND COMPANY. VON BAUMBACH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. KEARSARGE LAND COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COU
Caminetti v. United States
CAMINETTI v. UNITED STATES. DIGGS v. UNITED STATES. HAYS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. .CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COUÜT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 139, 163, 464. Argued Nove
BERRY v. DAVIS
BERRY ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF PAROLE OF IOWA, ET AL. v. DAVIS. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP IOWA. No. 47. Submitted October 26, 1916. Decided January 15, 1917. When injunctive re
Illinois Central Railroad v. Williams
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. WILLIAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 637. Argued December 6, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Section 2 of the supplementary Safety Appliance Act of April 14, 1910,
Chaloner v. Sherman
CHALONER v. SHERMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 121. Argued November 16, 17, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Omission of the statutes of New York concerning proceedings de lunático inquirendo (Code of C
Western Transit Co. v. A. C. Leslie & Co.
WESTERN TRANSIT COMPANY v. A. C. LESLIE & COMPANY, LIMITED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 104. Argued December 19, 20, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Plaintiff consigned goods from Michigan to New York City over a
Dean v. Davis
DEAN v. DAVIS, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF JONES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 70. Argued November 6, 7, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. A transfer of property by an insolvent, made to secure a con
Williams v. City of Chicago
WILLIAMS, CHIEF, ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 128. Argued December 22, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. At the date of the Treaty of Greenville
Furness, Withy & Co. v. Yang-Tsze Insurance
FURNESS, WITHY & COMPANY, LIMITED, v. YANG-TSZE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE . . ■ SECOND CIRCUIT. ' No. 106. Argued December 18, 19, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Petitions for
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.