Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hawkins v. Bleakly
HAWKINS v. BLEAKLY, AUDITOR OF THE STATE OF IOWA, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP IOWA. No. 35. Submitted January 24, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916; reargue
New York Central Railroad Co. v. White
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. WHITE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 320. Argued February 29, March 1, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916
Owensboro v. Owensboro Water Works Co.
OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY, v. OWENSBORO WATER WORKS COMPANY OF OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN -DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No. 79. Argued November 8, 1916. — Decided March 6, 1917. A city grante
Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.
ENTERPRISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ET AL. v. FARMERS MUTUAL CANAL COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ■ NEBRASKA. No. 48. Argued January 22, 23, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. In a suit to determine the relative rights of
The Steamship Appam
THE STEAMSHIP APPAM. APPEALS FBOM THE DISTBICT COUBT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE EASTEBN DISTBICT OF VIBGINIA. Nos. 650, 722. Argued January 15, 16, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. The British merchant s'téamship Appam,, captured on the hig
William R. Staats Co. v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
WILLIAM R. STAATS COMPANY ET AL. v. SECURITY TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, TRUSTEE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. • No. 608. Motion to dismiss. Submitted January 10, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. A suit brought
Baker v. Schofield
BAKER ET AL. v. SCHOFIELD, RECEIVER OF THE MERCHANTS’ NATIONAL BANK OF SEATTLE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 133. Submitted January 15, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. The rule that concurrent findings
Gannon v. Johnston
GANNON v. JOHNSTON ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 131. Argued December 22, 1916. — Decided March 6, 1917. Under the Choctaw-Chickasaw supplemental agreement of July 1, 1902, §§ 11, 12, 15 and 16, 32 Stat. 64
Five per Cent. Discount Cases
THE FIVE PER CENT. DISCOUNT CASES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS. Nos. 149 to 162. Argued February 25, 28, 1916; restored to docket for reargument March 6, 1916; reargued February 2, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917.
Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.
PENNSYLVANIA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA v. GOLD ISSUE MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 584. Argued January 29, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. A fire insurance company, to obtai
McDonald v. Mabee
McDonald v. Mabee. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 135. Submitted January 31, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. A person domiciled in Texas left the State intending to make his home elsewhere, his family residing there me
Thomsen v. Cayser
THOMSEN ET AL., COMPOSING THE FIRM OF THOMSEN & COMPANY, v. CAYSER ET AL., COMPOSING THE FIRM OF CAYSER, IRVINE & COMPANY, ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 2. Argued April 28, 29, 1914; restored to do
Donohue v. Vosper
DONOHUE v. VOSPER ET AL. .ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 445. Argued January 26, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. When it appears by the state'court’s opinion that both parties relied upon the construction and effect
State of New Mexico v. Lane
STATE OF NEW MEXICO v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND TALLMAN, COMMISSIONER OF THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE. IN EQUITY. No. 20, Original. Motion to dismiss. Submitted January 8, 1917. Decided March 6, 1917. The State of New Mexico filed it
Selling v. Radford
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF SELLING ET AL., A SPECIAL COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, v. RADFORD. PETITION TO DISBAR. No. 21, Original. Submitted November 20, 1916. — Order made March 6, 1917.
Raymond v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
RAYMOND v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 636. Argued January 31, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. Plaintiff, employed by the defendant, an interstate carrier, w
Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co.
BAY v. MERRILL & RING LOGGING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 165. Argued January 30, 31, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. Upon a state of facts not substantially different from those presented in McC
McCluskey v. Marysville & Northern Railway Co.
McCLUSKEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF NORDGARD, v. MARYSVILLE & NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 166. Argued January 30, 31, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. The course of business of a co
Bowersock v. Smith
BOWERSOCK v. SMITH, ADMINISTRATRIX OF SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS.. No. 172. Submitted February 1, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. A State may by law provide for the protection of employees engaged in hazardous o
Union National Bank v. McBoyle
UNION NATIONAL BANK ET AL. v. McBOYLE ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 164. Argued January 24, 25, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. The board of directors of a national bank have power under the National Bank
Bond v. Hume
BOND ET AL., PARTNERS AS BOND & BUTTFIELD, v. HUME. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 119. Argued February 2, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. An independent sovereignty will not lend the aid of its cour
Wellsville Oil Co. v. Miller
WELLSVILLE OIL COMPANY v. MILLER, née EVERETT, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 541. Argued December 6, 1916. — Decided March 6, 1917. A controversy in a state court involving the power of the United States Co
Tyrrell v. District of Columbia
TYRRELL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF TYRRELL, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 54. Argued November 1, 1916. — Decided March 6, 1917. It is the duty of this court to dismiss a certiorari upon
Ex parte White
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of John P. White, as President, and William Green, as Secretary Treasurer, of United Mine Workers of America, et al., Petitioners. Submitted January 29, 1917. Decided February 5, 1917.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.