Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Towing Co.
No. 710. Pittsburgh Coal Company of Illinois v. Great Lakes Towing Company. November 11, 1918. Mr. Harrison Musgrave and Mr. William S. Ovpenheim for petitioner. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder, Mr. Thomas H. Garry, Mr., J ames H. Wilkerson and Mr. E
Madden v. Forbes
No. 369. John C. Madden v. W. M. Forbes. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motion to dismiss submitted November 4, 1918. Decided November 11, 1918. Mr. Joseph M. Stark for plaintiff in error. Mr. Stephen H. Allen for defend
Sugar v. United States
Nos. 686, 687. Maurice Sugar v. United States. November 4, 1918. Mr. Willis G. Clark for- petitioner. Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Todd, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Porter and Mr. W. C. Herron for the United States.
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Bixby
No. 624. Cudahy Packing Company v. William K. Bixby et al., Receivers, etc. November 4, 1918. Mr. George T. Buckingham and Mr. Charles T. Tittmann for petitioner. Mr. James L. Minnis for respondents.
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
No. 524. Western Union Telegraph Company v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. Appeal from the Circtlit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. November 4, 1918. Mr. William L. Clay and Mr. Rush Taggart, for appellant, in support of t
Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Gray
No. 625. Seaboard Air Line Railway Company v. J. J. Gray. November 4, 1918. Mr. Jo-Berry S. Lyles for petitioner. Mr. Fred H. Dominick and Mr. Wallace D. Connor for respondent.
Deschutes Railroad v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.
No. 352. Deschutes Railroad Company v. Eastern Oregon Land Company. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 28, 1918. Decided November 4, 1918. Mr. Arthur C. Spencert and
Zanesville & Western Railway Co. v. Williams
No. 457. Zanesville & Western Railway Company v. Charles E. Williams, Administrator, etc. Error to the Court of Appeals of Muskingum County, State of Ohio. Motion to dismiss or affirm, and petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted Octobe
Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca di Navigazione
WATTS, WATTS & COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNIONE AUSTRIACA DI NAVIGAZIONE &c. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 25. Argued April 17, 1918. Decided November 4, 1918. Upon review of an admiralty ease, the court
Pittsburgh Melting Co. v. Totten
PITTSBURGH MELTING COMPANY v. TOTTEN, INSPECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 28. Argued April 22, 1918. Decided November 4, 1918. Oleo
Camp Bird, Ltd. v. Howbert
No. 421. Camp Bird, Limited, v. Frank W. Howbert, as Collector, etc. Certiorari to'the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. October 28, 1918. Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Todd for respondent. Mr. William V. Hodges and .
Schneider v. City of New York
No. 680. Louisa B. Schneider et al. v. City of New York et al. October 28, 1918. Mr. Charles P. Brown and Mr. Merle I. Si. John for petitioners. Mr. William P. Burr for respondents.
State Industrial Commission v. Clarence P. Howland Co.
No. 672. State Industrial Commission of the State of New York v. Clarence P. Howland Company, Inc., et al. October 28, 1918. Mr. E. Clarence Aiken and Mr. Merton E. Lewis for petitioner. Mr. Andrew J. Nellis for respondents.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Stag Line, Ltd.
No. 660. Southern Pacific Company, Claimant, etc., et al., v. Stag Line, Limited, Claimant, etc. October 28, 1918. Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for petitioners. Mr. William B. Lockhart for respondent.
New York Central Railroad v. Kimball
No. 647. New York Central Railroad Company v. Kathryn G. Kimball, Administratrix, etc. October 28, 1918. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. Maurice C. Spratt for petitioner. Mr. Hamilton Ward for respondent.
Life Preserver Suit Co. v. National Life Preserver Co.
No. 640. Life Preserver Suit Company, Inc., v. National Life Preserver Company et al. October 28, 1918. Mr. Edward E. McCall for petitioner. Mr. W. Bourke Cochran for respondents.
De Prevost v. Young
No. 627. Teresa O. De Prevost v. Robert A. Young. October 28, 1918. Mr. Frank W. Hackett for petitioner. Mr. Frederick de C. Faust, Mr. Charles F. Wilson and Mr. George Kearney for respondent. •
Montezuma Valley Irrigation District v. Norris
No. 613. Montezuma Valley Irrigation District et al. v. Mark Norris et al. October 28, 1918. Mr. B. W. Ritter for petitioners. Mr. Mark Norris, Mr: Clyde C. Dawson, Mr. Fred R. Wright and Mr. Charles D. Hayt for respondents.
Robinson v. Hutchins
No. 604. A. C. Robinson, Trustee, etc., v. Edward W. Hutchins et al., Trustees, etc. October 28, 1918. Mr. Alvin A. Morris, Mr. Samuel McClay, Mr. Thomas Patterson and Mr. J. Merrill Wright for petitioner. Mr. Herman Aaron, and Mr. M. W. Ac
Darling v. City of Newport News
No. 600. Frank W. Darling v. City of Newport News. Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. October 28, 1918. Mr. John Winston Read and Mr. Maryus Jones, for plaintiff in error, in support of the petition. Mr. John A.
Snyder v. Snyder ex rel. Hunt
No. 590. William Snyder v. Annie Snyder, use of William L. Hunt. October 28, 1918. Mr. James B. Reilly for petitioner. Mr. R. W. Bishop for respondent.
Hodge v. Meyer
No. 586. Nellie Hodge, as Administratrix, etc., et al. v. Arthur L. Meyer et al. October 28, 1918. Mr. Jules*Chopak and Mr. Walter Carroll Low for petitioners. Mr. Howard Taylor, Mr. Philip W. Bussell and Mr. Roy C. Gasser for respondents.
Malvin v. United States
No. 573. Louis Malvin et al. v. United States. October 28, 1918. Mr. Louis Marshall for petitioners. No brief for the United States.
Darrow v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
No. 555. Jessie G. Darrow v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company. October 28, 1918. Mr. Frank W. Hacketf and Mr. Paul J. Sherwood for petitioner. Mr. Henry A. Knapp for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.