Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Payne v. Kansas ex rel. Brewster
PAYNE ET AL. v. STATE OF KANSAS EX REL. BREWSTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 49. Argued November 15, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A state law forbidding sale of farm produce on commission wit
Ruddy v. Rossi
RUDDY v. ROSSI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO,. No. 17. Submitted November 13, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Section 4 of the Homestead Act of May 20,1862, (§ 2296, Rev. Stats.), providing that no lands acquired under-t
United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.
UNITED DRUG COMPANY v. THEODORE RECTANUS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF .APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 27. Argued March 12, 13, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A right of trade-mark is not a right in gross; it exists only
Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United States
ALASKA PACIFIC FISHERIES v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 212. Argued November 4, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. For safeguarding and advancing a dependent Indian people, resident on isl
Sterrett ex rel. Alabama Trust & Savings Co. v. Second National Bank
STERRETT, AS RECEIVER OF THE ALABAMA TRUST & SAVINGS COMPANY, v. SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI, OHIO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 378. Argued November 8, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A chanc
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Lewellyn
GULF OIL CORPORATION v. LEWELLYN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE TWENTY-THIRD DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 310. Argued November 4, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Div
Union Pacific Railroad v. Public Service Commission
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 65. Argued November 19, 20, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A Utah corporation, operating an extensive railroa
Watters v. Michigan
WATTERS v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 58. Submitted November 19, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. Whether a city ordinance regulating peddling and canvassing from house to house
Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Powder Co.
BUCKEYE POWDER COMPANY v. E. I. DuPONT De NEMOURS POWDER COMPANY ET AL. 'error to the circuit court oe appeals eor the third CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued April 30, May 1, 1917; restored to docket for reargument June 10, 1918; reargued November 13
Van Dyke v. Arizona Eastern Railroad
VAN DYKE ET AL. v. ARIZONA EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARIZONA. No. 59. Argued November 19, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. A railroad company, having surveyed a line over public land and filed map a
E. W. Bliss Co. v. United States
E. W. BLISS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 15. Argued November 20, 21, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. In a contract for supplying torpedoes, the manufacturer agreed with the G
Orr v. Allen
ORR v. ALLEN ET AL. APPEAL FROM T&É DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 288. Submitted October 14, 1918. Decided December 9, 1918. The “Conservancy Act of Ohio,” designed to prevent floods, and authori
William Wrigley, Jr., Co. v. L. P. Larson, Jr., Co.
No. 723. William Wrigley, Jr., Company v. L. P. Larson, Jr., Company. November 25, 1918. Mr. Robert H. Parkinson, Mr. Isaac H. Mayer and Mr. Wallace R. Lane for petitioner. Mr. Charles H. Aldrich and Mr. Frank F. Reed for respondent.
Going v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
No. 77. Willie M. Going, Administratrix of Nathan W. Going, v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Submitted November 21, 1918. Decided November 25, 1918. Mr. W. L. Welborn for
United States v. E. W. Bliss Co.
No. 16. United States v. E. W. Bliss Company. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. November 20, 1918. Mr. Frank H. Platt and Mr. Eli J. Blair for appellee.
Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Township of Republic
No. 229. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company v. Township of Republic. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. November 18, 1918. Mr. William P. Belden for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant mirror.
Penfold v. Travis ex rel. New York
No. 46. Edmund Penfold et al., Executors, etc., et al. v. Eugene M. Travis, as Comptroller of the State of New York. Error to the Surrogate’s Court, New York County, State of New York. Argued November 15, 1918. Decided November 18, 1918. Mr
Henderson v. Ressor
No. 41. G. L. Henderson et al. v. Helen R. Ressor, or Helen R. Henderson, et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Argued November 14, 1918. Decided November 18, 1918. Mr. C. W. Prince, with whom Mr. Daniel V. Howell was
Palmer v. Ohio
PALMER ET AL. v. STATE OF OHIO. .ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 260. Motion to affirm submitted October 28, 1918. Decided November 18, 1918. The right of individuals to sue a State depends entirely on the consent of th
Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co. v. Fletcher Paper Co.
DETROIT & MACKINAC RAILWAY COMPANY v. FLETCHER PAPER COMPANY. SAME v. ISLAND MILL LUMBER COMPANY. SAME v. CHURCHILL LUMBER COMPANY SAME v. RICHARDSON LUMBER COMPANY. SAME v. MICHIGAN VENEER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O
Georgia v. Trustees of the Cincinnati Southern Railway
STATE OF GEORGIA v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE CINCINNATI SOUTHERN RAILWAY AND THE CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS & TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. IN EQUITY. No. 21 Original. Argued November 7, 1918. Decided November 18, 1918. In the absence of language
Lay v. Lay
LAY ET AL. v. LAY ET AL. ERROR TO THE, SUPREME COURT -.OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 633. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 4, 1918. Decided November 18, 1918. •As between the parties to- it, an assignment of a claim againct
King v. Putnam Investment Co.
KING v. PUTNAM INVESTMENT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT'OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 10. Submitted November 7, 1918. Decided November 18, 1918. The contention that a contract of agency to sell real estate was void because federal lands
Metropolitan State Bank v. Illinois
No. 30. Metropolitan State Bank v. People of the State of Illinois. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. November 11, 1918. Mr. Philip J. McKenna and Mr. Howard F. Bishop for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward J. Brundage and Mr
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.