Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
No. 728. Valentine T. Collard, Administrator of the Estate of Samuel T. Collard, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Motion
Pendleton v. Benner Line
PENDLETON v. BENNER LINE. CERTIORARI TO THJ3 CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 178. Argued March 11, 12, 1918. Decided March 25, 1918. Liability over is the reason for a bailee’s right to recover the full value of the goo
Spear v. United States
No. 911. Ed Spear, Petitioner, v. United States. March 18, 1918. Mr. S. W. Fordyce, Jr.,.and Mr. Truman Post Young for petitioner. The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fitts for the United States.
Harmon v. Barber
No. 884. Judson Harmon et al., Receivers, etc., Petitioners, v. Lucinda Barber, Administratrix. March 18, 1918. Mr. Morison R. Waite and Mr. John Randolph Scfiindel for petitioners. Mr. C. B. Matthews for respondent.
New v. United States
No. 857. John Fair New, Petitioner, v. United States. March 18, 1918. 'Mr.. R. E. Ragland for petitioner. The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fitts for the United States.
Illinois Central Railroad v. Lanis
No. 320. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. Marshall Lanis, Administratrix of Marshall Lanis, Deceased. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Motion to dismiss or affirmed submitted March 11, 1
John Gund Brewing Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.
No. 187. John Gund Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Great Northern Railway Company et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Argued March 13, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. Mr. Frederick W. Zollm
Cave v. Missouri ex rel. Newell
No. 858. Rhodes E. Cave et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Missouri ex rel. James P. Newell. In error, to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Motion to dismiss submitted March 11, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. Mr. George B. We
Omaechevarria v. Idaho
OMAECHEVARRIA v. STATE OF IDAHO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 102. Argued December 20, 1917. Decided March 18, 1918. A law of Idaho (Rev. Codes, 1908, § 6872), applicable to the public domain, provides that any pers
Sheckels v. District of Columbia
SHECKELS, SURVIVING EXECUTRIX OF SHECKELS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 144. Argued January 28, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. Under the Act of June 16, 1880, c. 243, 21 Stat. 284, as amended March 3’, 1881,
Wells v. Roper
WELLS v. ROPER, FIRST ASSISTANT POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 103. Argued January 2, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. The First Assistant Postmaster General, in accor
Union Pacific Railroad v. Hadley
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. HADLEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF CRADIT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 174. Argued March 7, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. If the defendant’s conduct, viewed as a whole, warrants a finding
Ireland v. Woods
IRELAND v. WOODS, POLICE COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF. APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 611. Argued March 6, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. The jurisdiction to review a state court judgment by writ of erro
Rock Spring Distilling Co. v. W. A. Gaines & Co.
ROCK SPRING DISTILLING COMPANY ET AL. v. W. A. GAINES & COMPANY. CERTIOEAEI TO THE CIBCUIT COURT, OF APPEALS FOE THE SIXTH CIBCUIT. No. 58. Argued January 31, February 1, 1918. Decided March 18, 1918. Under the common law and the federal re
Stadelman v. Miner
STADELMAN ET AL. v. MINER ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 644. Petition for rehearing. Leave to file granted, petition allowed and former dismissal vacated March 18, 1918. The case having been dismissed for wan
Illinois Central Railroad v. Skinner
No. 874. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. Alline Skinner, Administratrix, etc. March 11, 1918. Mr. Robert V. Fletcher, Mr. Edmund F. Trabue, Mr. Blewett Lee and Mr. Charles K. Wheeler for petitioner. 'Mr. David A. Baer for
Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Inhabitants of Framingham
No. 850. Capital Savings Bank & Trust Company, Petitioner, v. Inhabitants of the Town of Framingham. March 11, 1918. Mr. Charles F. Choate, Jr., and Mr. Samuel E. Swayze for petitioner. Mr. Alfred Hemen-way and Mr. Edwin H. Abbot, Jr., for
Rouss v. Association of the Bar of New York
No. 823. Jacob Rouss, Petitioner, v. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. March 11, 1918. Mr. Charles E. LeBarhier for petitioner. Mr. Einar Chrystie and Mr.. George W. Wickersham for respondent.
Ricaud v. American Metal Co.
RICAUD ET AL. v. AMERICAN METAL COMPANY, LIMITED. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 119. Submitted January 3, 1918. Decided March 11, 1918. The requirement that a certificate from the Circuit Court of
Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.
OETJEN v. CENTRAL LEATHER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP HUDSON COUNTY, STATE OP NEW JERSEY. Nos. 268, 269. Argued January 3, 4, 1918. Decided March 11, 1918. The court notices judicially that the Government of the United States rec
Cissna v. Tennessee
CISSNA v. STATE OF TENNESSEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TENNESSEE. No. 20. Argued November 10, 1916; restored to docket for reargument December 11, 1916; reargued October 9, 10, 1917. Decided March 11, 1918. If the state su
Goldsmith v. Meyer
No. 631. David Goldsmith et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Alfred C. F. Meyer. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. March 4, 1918. Mr. David Goldsmith for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Hickman P. Rodgers for defendant in error.
Creveling v. Newton
No. 843. John L. Creveling, Petitioner, v. J. T. Newton, Commissioner of Patents. March 4, 1918. Mr. Delos G. Haynes, Mr. Robert S. Blair and Mr. Paul A. Blair for petitioner. No brief filed for respondent.
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Houston Ice & Brewing Co.
No. 808. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company, Petitioner, v. Houston Ice & Brewing Company et al. March 4, 1918. Mr. Russell Jackson for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.