Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Schenck v. United States
SCHENCK v. UNITED STATES. BAER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 437, 438. Argued January 9, 10, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. Evidence held sufficient, to conne
Panama Railroad v. Bosse
PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOSSE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 203. Submitted January 31, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. An order of the President continuing in force for the government of the Canal Zone “t
G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United States
G. S. NICHOLAS & COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ALEX. D. SHAW & COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OE CUSTOMS APPEALS. Nos. 62, 63. Argued January 14, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. The allowance of three
Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.
BUTTE & SUPERIOR COPPER COMPANY, LIMITED, v. CLARK-MONTANA REALTY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 598. Argued January 10, 13, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. In a suit brought in the District
Harriman National Bank v. Seldomridge
HARRIMAN NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK v. SELDOMRIDGE, AS RECEIVER OF THE MERCANTILE NATIONAL BANK OF PUEBLO, COLORADO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 173. Argued January 31, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. A, th
Carolina Spruce Co. v. Black Mountain Railway Co.
No. 527. Carolina Spruce Company v. Black Mountain Railway Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. February 3, 1919. Mri\ Robert Burrow for plaintiff in error. Mr. John W. Price for defendant in error.
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Wright
CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. WRIGHT, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 163. Argued January 21, 1919. Decided February 3, 1919. The same reasons which led this court
Oelwerke Teutonia v. Erlanger
OELWERKE TEUTONIA v. ERLANGER ET AL., PARTNERS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF ERLANGER & GALINGER. ERLANGER ET AL., PARTNERS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF ERLANGER & GALINGER, v. OELWERKE TEUTONIA. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS.
Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Groves
No. 800. Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Sallie Ann Groves. January 27, 1919. Mr. Henry P. Blair for petitioner. Mr. W. Gwynn Gardiner for respondent.
In re Kinney
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Robert D. Kinney, Petitioner. Submitted January 20, 1919. Decided January 27, 1919. Mr. Robert D. Kinney pro se.
Boxley v. Scott
No. 182. J. D. Boxley v. E. M. Scott et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted January 23, 1919. Decided January 27, 1919. Mr. Harry H. Rogers for plaintiff in error. Mr. William P. Langston for defendants in. er
Van Buskirk v. Erie Railroad
No. 153. Elmira Van Buskirk, Administratrix of William Van Buskirk, v. Erie Railroad Company. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Argued January 20, 1919. Decided January 27, 1919. Mr. Charles A. Ludlow, with whom M
United States v. New Orleans Pacific Railway
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEA
Mount Saint Mary's Cemetery Ass'n v. Mullins
MOUNT SAINT MARY’S CEMETERY ASSOCIATION v. MULLINS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 56. Argued November 15, 18, 1918. Decided January 27, 1919. The land of a cemetery association was assessed as a whole, and sub- •
Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of Hope
PIERCE OIL CORPORATION v. CITY OF HOPE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT'OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 137. Submitted January 16, 1919. Decided January 27, 1919. A city ordinance forbidding the storage of petroleum and gasoline within 300 feet of
Bank of California, National Ass'n v. Roberts
BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. ROBERTS, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 115. Submitted December 19, 1918. Decided January 27, 1919. Decided on authority of Bank
Bank of California, National Ass'n v. Richardson
BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. RICHARDSON, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 262. Submitted October 14, 1918. Decided January 27, 1919. The extent to which the Sta
Peyser v. Grauten
No. 780. Michael Peyser v. Elizabeth J. Grauten. January 20, 1919. Mr. Maurice B. Gluck for petitioner. Mr. Walter- B. Milkman and Mr. William J. Hughes for respondent.
Wheeler ex rel. Wheeler v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.
No. 120. Elvie Wheeler, by his next friend, P. T. Wheeler, v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company. Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Submitted January 14, 1919. Decided January 20, 1919. Mr. Buford
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Tonopah & Tidewater Railroad
POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY v. TONOPAH & TIDEWATER RAILROAD COMPANY. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILROAD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPE
La Tourette v. McMaster
LA TOURETTE v. McMASTER, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 114. Submitted December 19, 1918. Decided January 20, 1919. The power of a State over the subject
J. Homer Fritch, Inc. v. United States
J. HOMER FRITCH, INCORPORATED, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued November 19, 1918. Decided January 20, 1919. Judgments of the District Courts in suits. against the United S
Kansas City Railways Co. v. McAllister
No. 791. Kansas City Railways Company v. Frank W. McAllister, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. January 13, 1919. Mr. Frank Hagerman, Mr. Richard J. Higgins
Hanecy v. Taylor
No. 770. Elbridge Hanecy v. James W. Taylor, Trustee, etc. January 13, 1919. Mr. Elbridge Hanecy 'pro se. Mr. Alvin H. Culver for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.