Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bisight Co. v. Onepiece Bifocal Lens Co.
No. 892. The Bisight Company et al. v. Onepiece Bifocal Lens Company. March 17, 1919. Mr. Cyrus N. Anderson for petitioners. Mr. Edward Rector and Mr. V. H. Lockwood for respondent.
Zenith Carburetor Co. v. Stromberg Motor Devices Co.
No. 866. Zenith Carburetor Company v. Stromberg Motor Devices Company. March 17, 1919. Mr. Clarence-P. Byrnes and. Mr. Melville Church for - petitioner. Mr. Charles A. Brown fpr respondent.
Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Da Vella
No. 239. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company v. Oresta Da Vella, Royal Italian Consul, as Administrator, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado. Submitted March 14, 1919. Decided March 17, 1919. Mr. Elroy N. Clark and Mr.
Supreme Conclave v. Wilson
No. 373. Supreme Conclave, Improved Order of Heptasophs, v. William Marshall Wilson. Error to and on petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. Argued March 3, 1919. Decided March 17, 1919. Mr. Geor
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. City of Richmond
POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY v. CITY OF RICHMOND. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE. .UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. * No. 169. Argued January 22, 1919. Decided March 17, 1919. The City of Richmond is authorized b
Gratiot County State Bank v. Johnson ex rel. St. Louis Chemical Co.
GRATIOT COUNTY STATE BANK v. JOHNSON, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ST. LOUIS CHEMICAL COMPANY, BANKRUPT. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE. STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 148. Submitted January 20, 1919. Decided March 17, 1919. Although an adjudication o
Public Utilities Commission v. Landon
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS ET AL. v. LANDON, RECEIVER OF THE KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, ET AL. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, ET AL. v. LANDON, RECEIVER OF THE KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, ET AL. KANSAS CITY GAS COMPANY ET
Crocker v. Malley
CROCKER ET AL., TRUSTEES, v. MALLEY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 'FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 649. Argued March 6, 1919. Decided March 17, 1919. A law should not be construed to tax the same inco
South Dakota v. Collins
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA v. COLLINS. IN EQUITY. No. 10, Original. Submitted March 4, 1919. Decided March 17, 1919. Under the constitution and laws of South Dakota, interest received by the state treasurer on state funds deposited by him in ban
St. Charles Amusement & Transportation Co. v. Elhardt
No. 884. St. Charles Amusement & Transportation Company v. Ludwig B. Elhardt et al. March 10, 1919. Mr. Lowrie C. Barton for petitioner. Mr. T. A. Wright and Mr. Will D. Wright for respondents.
Massachusetts v. Liquid Carbonic Co.
No. 844. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Liquid Carbonic Company. March 10, 1919. Mr. William Harold Hitchcock and Mr. Henry C. Attwill for petitioner.- Mr. Charles A. Snow and Mr. William P. Everts for respondent.
Keefe v. Worcester Trust Co.
No. 827. Joseph P. Keefe, Trustee, etc., v. Worcester Trust Company. March 10, 1919. Mr. Arthur T. Johnson for petitioner. Mr. Edmund K. Arnold for respondent.
Foster v. Lancaster
No. 818. Frances B. Foster, Suing for Herself and Surviving Children of A. G. Foster, Deceased, v. J. L. Lancaster et al., Receivers, etc. March 10, 1919. Mr. Wm. H. Winter for petitioner. Mr. George Thompson for respondents.
Kirchner v. United States
No. 857. H. E. Kirchner v. United States. March 10, 1919. Mr. J. W. Vandervort for petitioner. Mr. John Lord O'Brian and Mr. Alfred Bettman for the United States.
Tyrrell v. Shaffer
No. 682. Bessie Tyrrell, etc., v. Charles B. Shaffer et al. Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted March 6, 1919. Decided March 10, 1919. Mr. Henry B. Martin and Mr. Richard Clyde Allen for petitioners. Mr. Malc
California v. Mono County Irrigation Co.
No. 208. State of California v. Mono County Irrigation Company. Error to the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, State of California. Submitted March 5, 1919. Decided March 10, 1919. Mr. U. S. Webb and Mr. John T. Nourse for
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Leach
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. LEACH. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 132. Argued January 15, 16, 1919. Decided March 10, 1919. A stipulation in an interstate bill of lading conditioning the shi
Debs v. United States
DEBS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 714. Argued January 27, 28, 1919. Decided March 10, 1919. The delivery of a speech in such words and such circumstances that the
Frohwerk v. United States
FROHWERK v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 685. Argued January 27, 1919. Decided March 10, 1919. The First Amendment, while prohibiting legislation against free spee
New York v. New Jersey
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS. IN EQUITY. No. 3, Original. Argued November 8, 11, 12, 1918. Order entered March 10, 1919. Order opening case for additional and supplemental
Shaffer v. Howard
SHAFFER v. HOWARD, AUDITOR OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 375. Argued December 13, 1918. Decided March 10, 1919. A suit against state officials
Buskirk v. Caudill
No. 834. U. B. Buskirk et al., as Partners Composing Kentucky River Hardwood Company v. Isham Caudill, as Administrator, etc. Error to the Court of Appeals of .the State of Kentucky. March 3, 1919. Mr. Ed. C. O’Rear for plaintiffs in error.
Kenney v. United States
No. 817. James Kenney v. United States. March 3, 1919. Mr. J.. Q. Mahaffy, Mr. John J. King and Mr. W.L. Estes for petitioner: The Solicitor General 'and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Porter for the United States. .
Norfolk Southern Railroad v. King
No. 814. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company v. Furney King. March 3, 1919. Mr. Robert N. Simms and Mr. W. B. Rodman for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.