Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States ex rel. Billerman v. Long
No. 356. United States ex rel. George W. Billerman v. Matthew J. Long, Criminal Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Motion to dismi
Ex parte de Propper
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Albert Herschel de Propper. Suggestion of committee submitted January 27, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. Mr. Albert Herschel de Propper pro se. Mr. Charles W. Needham, Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and M
Seufert Bros. v. United States ex rel. Confederated Tribes & Bands
SEUFERT BROTHERS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, AS TRUSTEE AND GUARDIAN OF THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIANS AND NATIONS, ET AL. UNITED STATES, AS TRUSTEE AND GUARDIAN OF THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDI
Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Collins Produce Co.
CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. COLLINS PRODUCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 138. Submitted January 16, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. In an action against an initial carrier to re
Sugarman v. United States
SUGARMAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 345. Argued January 9, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. To empower this court to review a judgment of a. District Court as involving
Gilcrease v. McCullough
GILCREASE v. McCULLOUGH ET AL. certiorari to the supreme court of the state of OKLAHOMA.’ No. 167. Argued January 21, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. In declaring the enrollment records of the Commission to' the Five Civilized Tribes conclusiv
City of Richmond v. Bird
CITY OF RICHMOND v. BIRD ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 195. Argued January 28, 29, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. Under the law of Virginia and the charter of the City of Richmond, the city’s cl
Missouri & Arkansas Lumber & Mining Co. v. Greenwood District
MISSOURI & ARKANSAS LUMBER & MINING COMPANY v. GREENWOOD DISTRICT OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. .error to the district.court of the united states for THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 149. Submitted January 17, 1919. Decided Mar
New York Central Railroad v. Porter
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, SUCCESSOR OF THE NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, v. PORTER, FOR HERSELF AND FOR HER FOUR MINOR CHILDREN, ETC., ET AL. error to the supreme court, appellate division, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPART
Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Basham
CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. BASHAM, ADMINISTRATOR OF SPELLMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 111. Submitted December 19, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. Under § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the A
Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.
MIDDLETON v. TEXAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 102. Submitted December 18, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. There is a strong presumption that discrimin
Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
ARKADELPHIA MILLING COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. HASTY ET AL., COMPOSING THE PARTNERSHIP OF J. F. HASTY & SONS, v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Werk v. Parker
WERK ET AL., COPARTNERS UNDER THE NAME OF ROBERT F. WERK & COMPANY, v. PARKER ET AL., COPARTNERS UNDER THE NAME OF F. T. PARKER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 73. Argued November 21, 1918. Dec
North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.
NORTH PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. HALL BROTHERS MARINE RAILWAY & SHIPBUILDING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 53. Argued November 18, 19, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919
Ex parte Whitney Steamboat Corp.
EX PARTE WHITNEY STEAMBOAT CORPORATION, PETITIONER. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. No. 25, Original. Argued December 9, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. The jurisdiction acquired by the District Court through an attachment of a vessel on
Lane v. Pueblo of Santa Rosa
LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. v. PUEBLO OF SANTA ROSA. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 197. Argued January 29, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. The Pueblo of Santa Rosa is a legal entity, with capacit
L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.
L. A. WESTERMANN COMPANY v. DISPATCH PRINTING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 50. Submitted November 15, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. The liability imposed by § 25 of the Copyright Act attaches
Webb v. United States
WEBB ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE- SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 370. Argued January 16, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. The first sentence of § 2 of the Narcotic Drug Act of December 17, 1914, c. 1,38 St
United States v. Doremus
UNITED STATES v. DOREMUS. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 367. Submitted January 16, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. While Congress may not exert- authority which is wholly reserved to th
Whitehead v. Galloway
WHITEHEAD v. GALLOWAY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 184. Submitted January 23, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. Congress, having provided, through the Act of February 19, 1903, c. 707, 32 Stat. 841,. and the pr
Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Co.
COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. ALHAMBRA CIGAR & CIGARETTE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 180. Submitted January 22, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. An appeal from the Supreme Co
Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co.
WITHNELL v. RUECKING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 142. Argued January 16, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. When an assessment for a local improvement is made in accordance with a fixed rule pres
Alaska Salmon Co. v. Territory of Alaska
ALASKA SALMON COMPANY v. TERRITORY OF ALASKA. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 151. Argued January 20, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. Decided on the authority of Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Alaska, ante, 53. Wr
Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska
ALASKA PACIFIC FISHERIES v. TERRITORY OF ALASKA. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. . Nos. 117, 118. Argued December 19, 20, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. The provisions of the Judicial Code governing the review of-
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.