Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Tracy
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of J. A. Tracy, Petitioner. Submitted March 31, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Mr. C. M. Oneill for petitioner. See ante, 551.
Hartford Life Insurance v. Johnson
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 291. Submitted March 26, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Under Jud. Code, § 237, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, this court
Moore v. United States
MOORE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 278. Argued March 21, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. The Act of June 25,1910, c. 423, 36 Stat. 851, allowing compensation . from the United States for use of patented inventions, p
Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co.
HOUSTON ET AL. v. ST. LOUIS INDEPENDENT PACKING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 264. Argued March 20, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Under the Meat Inspection Act, the Secretary of Agriculture is
Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. STATE OF ARIZONA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARIZONA. No. 238. Submitted March 13, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Whether a shipment was at a given time interstate is a question of fact. P.477. Evi
Ex parte Wagner
EX PARTE WAGNER (TRADING AS THE AMERICAN MECHANICAL TOY COMPANY), ET AL., PETITIONERS. ON PETITION FOE WEIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 29, Original. Argued March 17, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Mandamus may be resorted to, in proper cases, for the
J. E. Hathaway & Co. v. United States
J. E. HATHAWAY & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 255. Argued March 19, 20, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. A finding by the Court of Claims that a delay by the Government in. approving a contract was reasonable
Barbour v. Georgia
BARBOUR v. STATE OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 191. Submitted January 24, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. One who acquirés liquor after approval and before the effective date of a state law making its pos
United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 201. Argued March 11, 12, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. The Act of March 4, 1913, c. 143, 37 Stat. 791, 797, authorizing the Postmaster Gener
Citizens Bank v. Opperman
CITIZENS BANK OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA, v. OPPERMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 234. Argued March 17, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. When a petition for rehearing is entertained in the state court, the judgment
United States v. Laughlin
UNITED STATES v. LAUGHLIN. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 200. Argued January 30, 31, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. The Act of March 26, 1908, c. 102, 35 Stat. 48, providing for repayment in all cases where it shall appear to the sati
Corn Products Refining Co. v. Eddy
CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY v. EDDY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 119. Argued January 14, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. A state regulation respecting the labeling of syrup compounds, which does not discrim
Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS v. COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 253. Submitted March 18, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Whether § 16 (c) of Philippi
Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Cameron
LAKE ERIE & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. STATE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS EX REL. CAMERON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 204. Argued March 13, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. An order of a state commissi
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Ochs
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. OCHS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF A. C. OCHS BRICK & TILE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ' MINNESOTA. No. 159. Argued January 20, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Under the la
Burr v. City of Columbus
BURR ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF PARKINSON & BURR, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 739. Argued January 10, 1919. Decide
Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of Columbus
COLUMBUS RAILWAY, POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 715. Argued January 10, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Constitutional questi
McKinley v. United States
McKINLEY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.: No. 417. Submitted March 3, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. Congress, under the authority to raise and support armies, m
Standard Oil Co. v. Graves
STANDARD OIL COMPANY v. GRAVES, AND GRAVES AS COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 177. Argued January 23, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. The construction of a sta
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United States
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 158. Argued March 26, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. When the Court of Claims fails to state what the contract was between the claimant an
Ex parte Hudgings
EX PARTE HUDGINGS, PETITIONER. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORRUS. No. 27, Original. Argued December 9, 1918. Decided April 14, 1919. The basis of the power of the federal courts to punish summarily for contempt committed in their presen
Matters v. Ryan
MATTERS v. RYAN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. . No. 141. Submitted January 16, 1919. Decided April 14, 1919. The District Court has no jurisdiction in habeas corpus to determine
United States v. Gudger
UNITED STATES v. GUDGER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 408. Argued December 11, 1918. Decided April 14, 1919. The Reed Amendment, prohibiting the transporting of liquor in inters
Corn Products Refining Co. v. States
No. 271. Corn Products Refining Company et al. v. United States. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 31, 1919. Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Mr. Morgan J. O’Brien, Mr. Preston Davie, Mr.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.