Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bethlehem Motors Corp. v. Flynt
BETHLEHEM MOTORS CORPORATION ET AL. v. FLYNT, SHERIFF OF FORSYTH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT ÓF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 254. Submitted March 22, 1921. Decided June 1, 1921. A North Carolina statute (Law
Ex parte Manufacturers' Products, Inc.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Exporters of Manufacturers’ Products, Inc., Petitioner. Submitted May 2, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921.
Ex parte Matthew Addy Steamship & Commerce Corp.
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW ADDY STEAMSHIP & COMMERCE CORPORATION, PETITIONER. ^PETITION. FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 30, Original. Argued April 11, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. An order of the District Court remanding a case to the stat
Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co.
VICKSBURG, SHREVEPORT & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. ANDERSON-TULLY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 270. Argued March 24, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. 17 The .provision of the amended Interstate
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.
NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. YORK & WHITNEY COMPANY. YORK & WHITNEY COMPANY v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR and certiorari to the superior COURT OP THE STATE OP MASSACHUSETTS. . Nos. 280, 28
United States v. Ætna Explosives Co.
UNITED STATES v. ÆTNA EXPLOSIVES COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OP CUSTOMS APPEALS. No. 296. Argued April 27, 28, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. The addition of 20 per cent of. sulphuric acid to a shipment of nitric acid, to re
Yee Won v. White
YEE WON v. WHITE, AS COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ' NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 209. Submitted April 20, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. A Chinese person who lawfully entered the
Frederick v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
FREDERICK, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF SCHMIDT, v. FIDELITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA. certiorari to the superior court of the state of ' PENNSYLVANIA. No. 547. Submitted January 3, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. An insurance
LaBelle Iron Works v. United States
LaBELLE IRON WORKS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 453. Argued January 6, 7, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. 1. The Act of October 3,1917, c. ^3, Tit. II, 40 Stat. 300, 302, in providing for a deduction of a percentage of
Dillon v. Gloss
DILLON v. GLOSS, DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 251. Argued March 22, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. 1. Article V of the Cons
Krichman v. United States
KRICHMAN v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 260. Argued March 23, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. A baggage porter employed in a station of a railroad controlled and operated by the United S
Heitmuller v. Stokes
HEITMULLER v. STOKES. ERROR TO THE . COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 279. Argued April 21, 22, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. The defendant in error, having secured judgment for the possession of his real estate, sold the pre
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank
AMERICAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY ET AL. v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 679. Argued April 13, 14, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. 1. A suit against a Federal R
New York Trust Co. v. Eisner
NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY ET AL., AS EXECUTORS OF PURDY, v. EISNER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 286. Argued April 25, 26, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. 1. The Act of September 8, 19
Brown v. United States
BROWN v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. No. 103. Argued November 19, 1920. Decided May 16, 1921. 1. The right of a man to stand his ground and defend himself when attacked with a deadly weap
Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Polk
PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY COMPANY v. POLK. CERTIORARI to the supreme court of the state of PENNSYLVANIA. No. 298, Argued April 28, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. In a proceeding under a state workmen's compensation law to recover for the
Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Di Donato
PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY COMPANY v. DI DONATO. CERTIORARI to the supreme court or the state or PENNSYLVANIA. No. 297. Argued April 28, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. A watchman employed on an interstate railroad at a public grade crossin
Blanset v. Cardin
BLANSET v. CARDIN, AS GUARDIAN OF DAYLIGHT, A MINOR, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIBCUIT COUBT OF APPEALS FOE THE EIGHTH CIBCUIT. No. 244. Argued April 20, 1921. Decided May 16, 1921. 1. The transmission of restricted Indian allotments by will i
St. Louis & East St. Louis Electric Railway Co. v. Missouri ex rel. Hagerman
ST. LOUIS & EAST ST. LOUIS ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MISSOURI AT THE RELATION AND TO THE USE OF HAGERMAN, COLLECTOR OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, IN THE STATE OF MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 261.
People v. New Jersey & Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS. In Equity. No. 2, Original. Argued November 8, 11, 12,1918; restored to docket for further argument March 10, 1919; reargued January 25, 1921.
Newberry v. United States
NEWBERRY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 559. Argued January 7, 10, 1921. Decided May 2, 1921. 1. Section*8 of the “Federal Corrupt Practices Act ” (June 25
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Middlekamp
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY v. MIDDLEKAMP, STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 636. Argued March 2, 3, 1921. Decided May
Ex parte Moran
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Thomas G. Moran, Petitioner. Submitted February 28, 1921. Decided April 25, 1921.
Nickel v. Cole
NICKEL ET AL., AS TRUSTEES, &c., ET AL. v. COLE, AS STATE CONTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. NICKEL ET AL., AS TRUSTEES, &c., ET AL. v. STATE OF NEVADA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. Nos. 268, 269. Argued March 24, 1921
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.