Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
The Carlo Poma
THE CARLO POMA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.. No. 167. Argued January 26^27, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. An appeal does not lie to the Circuit Court of Appeals from a final decree of the District C
The Pesaro
THE PESARO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT . COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 317. Argued January 26, 27, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. A decree in admiralty releasing a vessel finally from arrest, in a
Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
SMITH v. KANSAS CITY TITLE & TRUST COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 199. Argued January 6, 7, 8, 1920; restored to docket for reargument April 26, 1920; reargued Oc
Detroit United Railway v. City of Detroit
DETROIT UNITED RAILWAY v. CITY OF DETROIT ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 492. Argued January 5, 6, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Action of a city requiring a street
United States v. Highsmith
UNITED STATES v. HIGHSMITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRQUIT. No. 148. Argued January 17,18,1921. Decided February 28, 1921. Decided on the authority of United States v. Rogers, ante, 163. 257 Fed. Rep. 401, affi
United States v. Rogers
UNITED STATES v. ROGERS ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 147. Argued January 17, 18, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. In a proceeding to condemn land, the owner is entitled, as part of his just com
Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Mining Co.
SILVER KING COALITION MINES COMPANY v. CONKLING MINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO . AND APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 158, 187. Argued January 19, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Monuments prevail ove
Lower Vein Coal Co. v. Industrial Board
LOWER VEIN COAL COMPANY, v. INDUSTRIAL BOARD OF INDIANA ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP INDIANA. No. 186. Argued January 27, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. There is a sufficient distinctio
United States v. Russell
UNITED STATES v. RUSSELL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED'STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 143. Argued January 17, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. An experimental approach through a third person to the corrupt
Hartford Life Insurance v. Blincoe
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BLINCOE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF BARBER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATS QF MISSOURI. No. 161. Argued January 20,1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. In determining how far a decision of this court revers
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. City of Fremont
POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY v. CITY OF FREMONT. ERROR TO JTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 156. Submitted January 18, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. A- small license tax, imposed by a city on a telegraph company for the
Vandalia Railroad v. Schnull
VANDALIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. SCHNULL ET AL., COMPOSING THE FIRM OF SCHNULL & COMPANY, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 125. Argued December 16, 17, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. A railroad rate fixed by s
Weeds, Inc. v. United States
WEEDS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 558. Argued October 19, 20, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. Section 4 of the'Food Control Act is unconstituti
Oglesby Grocery Co. v. United States
OGLESBY GROCERY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 457. Argued October 19, 20, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. Decided upon the authority of United States v.
G. S. Willard Co. v. Palmer
G. S. WILLARD COMPANY ET AL. v. PALMER, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES , FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 418. Argued October 19,- 20, 1920. Decided February 28, 19
C. A. Weed & Co. v. Lockwood
C. A. WEED & COMPANY v. LOCKWOOD, AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. . No. 407. Argued October 19, 20, 1920. Decided Febr
Kinnane v. Detroit Creamery Co.
KINNANE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, v. DETROIT CREAMERY COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES v. SWARTZ. UNITED STATES v. SMITH. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIG
Kennington v. Palmer
KENNINGTON ET AL. v. PALMER ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 367. Argued October 19, 20, 1920. Decided February 28,1921.' 1.. Decided, as to the unconstitutionality of
Tedrow v. A. T. Lewis & Son Dry Goods Co.
TEDROW, AS UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, v. A. T. LEWIS & SON DRY GOODS COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OF tiOLORADO. No. 357. Argued October 19, 20,1920. D
United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.
UNITED STATES v. L. COHEN GROCERY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR . THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 324. Argued October 18,19,1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Section 4 of the Food Control Act of Augus
T. M. Duche & Sons, Ltd. v. American Schooner "John Twohy"
T. M. DUCHE & SONS, LIMITED, v. AMERICAN SCHOONER “JOHN TWOHY,” HER TACKLE, &c., CUMMINS ET AL., CLAIMANTS. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ■THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 84. Argued November 9, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Th
El Banco Popular de Economias y Prestamos v. Wilcox
EL BANCO POPULAR DE ECONOMIAS Y PRESTAMOS DE SAN JUAN, P. R., v. WILCOX. APPEAL- FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. ' No. 91 Argued November 12, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. The Act of January' 28, 1915, c. 22,
Lindsey v. Colorado ex rel. Rush
No. 154. Ben B. Lindsey v. People of the State of Colorado at the Relation of John A. Rush, District Attorney, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado. Argued January 18, 1921. Decided January 31, 1921. Mr. Edward P. Costig
McHenry v. Bankers Trust Co.
No. 191. S. A. McHenry et al. v. Bankers Trust Company et al. Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, First Supreme Judicial District, of the State of Texas. Argued January 28, 1921. Decided January 31, 1921. Mr. Don A. Bliss for plaintiffs in
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.