Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Winton v. Amos
WINTON, ADMINISTRATOR OF WINTON, ET AL. v. AMOS AND OTHERS, KNOWN AS THE MISSISSIPPI CHOCTAWS. BOUNDS, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR BOUNDS, v. SAME. LONDON v. SAME. FIELD ET AL. v. SAME. BECKHAM v. SAME. VERNON v. SAME. HOWE, EXECUTRIX OF HOWE v. S
Payne v. New Mexico
PAYNE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 128. Argued October 6, 1920. Decided March -7, 1921. 1. Under the acts of Congress entitling the State of New
Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. Cauble
SUPREME TRIBE OF BEN-HUR v. CAUBLE ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. . No. 274. Submitted January .10, 1921. Decided March 7, 1921. 1. .A suit brought against a fraternal benefit.associa
Western Pacific Railroad v. United States
WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES.. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 136.. Argued January 13, 1921. Decided March 7, 1921. 1.' A railroad company, acquiescing in the practice and rulings of government officials,charged a
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United States
OREGON—WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 134. Argued January 13, 1921.; Decided March 7, 1921. 1. Personal property of army officers, transported for them, when changing stations
Williams v. United States
WILLIAMS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 159. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted- November 22, 1920.— Decided March 7, 1921. The Act of March 3,1917, prohibiting
United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.
UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND COAL & COKE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 87. Argued November 11, 1920. Decided March 7, 1921. 1. The Government'has no equity to. maintain a suit to set aside a fraud
Mueller v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
No. 305. Otto Mueller et al. v. Northern Pacific Railway Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Motion to dismiss submitted January 31, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. Mr. Dallas V. Halverstadt and Mr. L. C. Steven
DeLamar Co. v. United States
No. 179. DeLamar Company, Limited, v. United States. Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Idaho. Submitted January 24, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. Mr. Richard H. Johnson for plaintiff in error. The Solic
Union Pacific Railroad v. Burke
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. BURKE. -CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ■ STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 183. Argued January 27, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. An agreement between an interstate railroad company and a shipper to. limit t
Amos v. United States
AMOS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 114. Argued December 13, 1920. Decided February 28,1921. 1. When it is clear and undisputed that property used in eviden
Gouled v. United States
GOULED v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 250. Argued January 4, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. The- Fourth and Fifth Amendments are to be liberally construed. P. 303. 2. When a
Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.
DAWSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY, ET AL. v. KENTUCKY DISTILLERIES & WAREHOUSE COMPANY. DAWSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. v. J. & A. FREIBERG COMPANY, INCORPORATED. APPEAL PRO
Armour & Co. v. City of Dallas
ARMOUR & COMPANY ET AL. v. CITY OF DALLAS ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT' COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 149. Argued January 18, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Where a city and a railway company agr
Ex parte Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. ’ No. 24, Original. Argued December 13, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. A writ of prohibi
Maguire v. Reardon
MAGUIRE ET AL. v. REARDON ET AL., AS COMMISSIONERS, CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF . CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE FIRST APPELLATE DIS
Edward Rutledge Timber Co. v. Farrell
EDWARD RUTLEDGE TIMBER COMPANY ET. AL. v. FARRELL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 172. Argued January 21, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Under the Act of March 2,1899, a lieu selection of unsurveyed
New Orleans Land Co. v. Leader Realty Co.
NEW ORLEANS LAND COMPANY v. LEADER REALTY COMPANY, LTD. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 152. Argued January 18, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. In a suit against New Orleans, w
United States v. Field
UNITED STATES v. FIELD, EXECUTOR OF FIELD. APPEAL PROM THE COTJKT OF CLAIMS. No. 442. Argued December 9, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. The provisions of laws imposing taxes are not to be extended by implication. P. 262. 2. The Revenue
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. J. F. Hasty & Sons
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. J. F. HASTY & SONS, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 178. Submitted January 21, 1921. Decided February 28, 192
Stoehr v. Wallace
STOEHR, SUING IN HIS OWN BEHALF AS A STOCKHOLDER IN STOEHR & SONS, INC., ETC. v. WALLACE ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 546. Argued January 4, 5, 1921. Decided February
Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.
PAYNE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. v. CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF. COLUMBIA. No. 17. Argued October 6, 1920. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. A selection .duly made and perfected by
Baender v. Barnett
BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 614. Argued January 11, 1921. Decided February 28, 1921. 1. Criminal Code, § 169,
Bodkin v. Edwards
BODKIN v. EDWARDS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.' No. 495. Motion to dismiss or-affirm submitted December 6, 1920.— Decided February 28, 1921. 1. The court accepts the concurrent findings of the District Co
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.