Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1921 Cases
257 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Mining Co.
SILVER KING COALITION MINES COMPANY v. CONKLING MINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 158. Petition for rehearing. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. Petition for rehearing treated as a motion for th
United States v. Smith
UNITED STATES v. L. P. & J. A. SMITH. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 253. Argued March 22, 23, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. In the performance of a contract with the United States for the excavation of a channel to specified depth
Gilpin v. United States
GILPIN, A MINOR, ETC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 243. Argued March 21, 22, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. Decided on the authority of Chase, Jr. v. United States, ante, 1. 261 Fed.
Chase v. United States
CHASE, JR., A MINOR, ETC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 242. Argued March 21, 22, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The cession made by the Omaha Indians through the treaties of 1854 a
City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Public Service Co.
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ET AL. v. SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 263. Argued March 23, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921. 1. The District Court has juris
Southern Iowa Electric Co. v. City of Chariton
SOUTHERN IOWA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY OF CHARITON, IOWA, ET AL. IOWA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, IOWA, ET AL. MUSCATINE LIGHTING COMPANY v. CITY OF MUSCATINE, IOWA, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE. DISTRICT COURT .OF THE UNITED STATES F
Walsh v. Brewster
WALSH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. BREWSTER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. No. 742. Argued March 10, 11, 1921. Decided March 28, 1921. 1. Bonds bought as an investment in 1909 were s
Goodrich v. Edwards
GOODRICH v. EDWARDS, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 663. Argued March 10, 11, 1921. D
Eldorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Mager
ELDORADO COAL & MINING COMPANY v. MAGER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 609. Argued January 12, 1921. Decided Mar
Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka
MERCHANTS’ LOAN & TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE OF ESTATE OF RYERSON, v. SMIETANKA, FORMERLY UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TOJTHE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORT
Wyoming v. United States
STATE OF WYOMING ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued October 6, 7,^ 1920. Decided March 28, 1921. 1. Lands “in place ” granted to a State for the support of schools, and
United States v. Coronado Beach Co.
UNITED STATES v. CORONADO BEACH COMPANY. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Nos. 524, 525. Argued March 1, 2, 1921. Decided March 28, 1921. 1. The fifth section! of the
Friedman v. United States
FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 221. Argued March 17, 1921. Decided March 28, 1921. Section 2347 of the Revised Statutes, in providing that public coal -lands may be entered upon payment of “not less than ” t
Lang v. New York Central Railroad
LANG, ADMINISTRATRIX OF LANG, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 290. Argued March 1, 1921. Decided March 28, 1921. 1. Failure of a railroad to equip a car with automatic coup
Washington ex rel. McPherson Bros. v. Douglas County
No. 231. State of Washington ex rel. McPherson Brothers Company v. Douglas County and Superior Court of Chelan County, Washington. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Submitted March 18, 1921. Decided March 21, 1921. Mr.
Hollis v. Kutz
HOLLIS ET AL. v. KUTZ ET AL., COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 397. Argued March 2,
Ex parte Riddle
EX PARTE RIDDLE, PETITIONER. ON PETITION. FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 27, Original. Argued February 28, March 1, 1921. Decided March 21, 1921. 1. Mandamus does not lie where there was an adequa ° remedy by . writ of error. P. 451. 2. A defend
Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
QUONG HAM WAH COMPANY v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 638. Argued March 9, 1921. Decided March 21, 1921. 1. This court is without authority to re
Southern Paper Co. v. Robertson
No. 551. Southern Paper Company v. Stokes V. Robertson, State Revenue Agent. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 7, 1921. Decided March 14, 1921. Mr. W. A. White for plaintiff
Payne v. United States ex rel. Newton
PAYNE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES EX REL. NEWTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 123. Argued December 16, 1920. Decided March 14, 1921. 1. After the lapse of two years from the date of
Illinois Central Railroad v. Johnson
No. 620. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. C. B. Johnson. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28,1921. Decided March 7, 1921. Mr. Augustus Benners, Mr. W. S. Horton and Mr. R
Harn v. Interstate Building & Loan Co.
No. 429. Alice Harn et al. v. Interstate Building and Loan Company et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted February 28, 1921. Decided March 7, 1921. Alice Ham and Mr. W. F. Ham, pro
United States ex rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. Burleson
UNITED STATES EX REL. MILWAUKEE SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PUBLISHING COMPANY v. BURLESON, POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 155. Argued January 18, 19, 1921. :Decided March 7, 19
Pierce v. United States
PIERCE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE’ CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 173. Argued January 24, 1921. Decided March 7, 1921. 1. A judgment for a fine imposed in a criminal case is enforceable, like a civil judg
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.