Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hawes v. Georgia
HAWES v. STATE OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, No. 95. Submitted January 17, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A state law providing that a person prosecuted for permitting apparatus for distilling intoxicatin
Harvey v. Union Traction Co.
No. 125. Gustavus French Harvey et al. v. Union Traction Company, J. D. Siggins, President. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. Submitted January 25, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. Mr. Gustavus
Pueblo of Laguna v. Candelaria
No. 75. Pueblo of Laguna v. Jose Candelaria et al. Appeal from the District Court of - the United States for the District of New Mexico. Argued January 12, 13, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. Mr. Francis C. Wilson for appellant. Mr. Frank
Smietanka v. First Trust & Savings Bank
SMIETANKA, AS COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, v. FIRST TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, TRUSTEE OF YOUNG, DECEASED. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 540. Arg
New York v. United States
STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, CLARK ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, AND (INTERVENING) LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE’ DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN ET AL. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 206. Argued March 11, 14, 15, 1921; restored to docket
Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
COMMISSIONERS OF ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LAFAYETTE COUNTY, ARKANSAS, v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 141. Argued January 26, 27, 1922. Decided Febr
Wallace v. United States
WALLACE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM. THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 118. Argued January 27, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. The limitations sought to be imposed upon the President’s power to remove an Army officer (118th Article of War, 39
United States v. M. Rice & Co.
UNITED STATES v. M. RICE & COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES' COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS. No. 114. Argued January 26, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. In an importer’s protest, under par. N of the Tariff Act of 1913, against a co
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Clarendon Boat Oar Co.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. CLARENDON BOAT OAR COMPANY, INC. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT, OF THE STATE OF’LOUISIANA. No. 102. Argued January 20, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A state law for securing jurisdicti
Terral v. Burke Construction Co.
TERRAL, AS SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. BURKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS.' No. 93. Argued January 17, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A
United States v. Cook
UNITED STATES v. COOK, EXECUTOR OF EAMES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE .COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 80. Argued January 13, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. Claimants contracted with the Government to plan and supervise the construction of a public build
Watkins v. Sedberry
No. 690. Thomas G. Watkins, Trustee, et al. v. J. H. Sedberry et al. January 30, 1922. Mr. C. C. Calhoun and Mr. Clarence T. Boyd for petitioners. Mr. Charles S. Lawrence for respondents.
Nesmith v. Ohio
No. 133. Luther M. Nesmith v. State of Ohio. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Motion to dismiss submitted January 16, 1922. Decided January 30, 1922. Mr. Smith W. Bennett and Mr. Benjamin F. James for plaintiff in error. Mr.
Georgia v. South Carolina
STATE OF GEORGIA v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. IN EQUITY. No. 16, Original. Argued January 4, 5, 1922. Decided January 30, 1922. Í. Under the Beaufort Convention of April 28, 1787, defining the boundary between South Carolina and Georgia on t
International Railway Co. v. Davidson
INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. DAVIDSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COLLECTOR OF THE PORT OF BUFFALO, ET AL. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 340. Argued January 3, 4, 1922. Decided January 3
Gillespie v. Oklahoma
GILLESPIE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA. ERROR to the supreme court oe the state of OKLAHOMA. No. 322. Argued January 3, 1922. Decided January 30, 1922. 1. The net income derived by a lessee from sales of his share of oil • and gas received under le
Corneli v. Moore
CORNELI v. MOORE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. GHIO v. MOORE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. BRYAN v. MILES, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, ET AL. EASTES v. CRUTCHLEY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SIX
North Dakota ex rel. Lemke v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA EX REL. LEMKE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 25, Original. Argued on motion to dismiss January 5, 1922. Decided January 23, 1922. 1. Section 211 of the Judicial Code,
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 20, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. January 16, 1922.
Pennsylvania v. West Virginia
No. 17, Original. No. 18, Original. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. State of West Virginia; and State of Ohio v. State of West Virginia. Argued December 8, 9, 1921. Order entered January 9, 1922.
Davis v. Wallace
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ET AL. v. WALLACE ET AL. Appeal from the district court of the united states FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 329. Argued December 16, 1921. Decided January 9, 1922. 1. Where the case as made by th
Davis v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co.
No. 652. James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc. v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Company. January 3, 1922. Mr. Carl Fox and Mr. R. C. Beckett for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde
GRANT SMITH-PORTER SHIP COMPANY v. ROHDE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR . THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 35. Argued December 7, 1920. Decided January 3, 1922. A workman employed generally as a carpenter by a builder of seagoing
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.