Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Texas v. Interstate Commerce Commission
STATE OF TEXAS v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION AND RAILROAD LABOR BOARD. IN EQUITY. No. 24, Original. Argued on motions to dismiss December 7, 8, 1921. Decided March 6, 1922. 1. Regarded as corporate entities created for governmental purp
Minnesota v. Wisconsin
STATE OF MINNESOTA v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. IN EQUITY. No. 11, Original. Motion for final decree submitted January 30, 1922. Decree entered February 27, 1922. Decree reciting report of commissioners heretofore appointed Lo run, locate and des
Crane v. Hahlo
CRANE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF SAUER, v. HAHLO ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF REVISION OF ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 107.
Leach v. Carlile
LEACH, DOING BUSINESS AS ORGANO PRODUCT COMPANY, v. CARLILE, POSTMASTER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 105. Submitted January 18, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. Whether the advertising of a medicina
Leser v. Garnett
LESER ET AL. v. GARNETT ET AL. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 553. Argued January 23, 24, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. A suit by qualified voters of Maryland to require the Maryland Board o
Fairchild v. Hughes
FAIRCHILD v. HUGHES, AS SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 148. Argued January 23, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. The general right of a citizen to have the
Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Salm
KEOKUK & HAMILTON BRIDGE COMPANY v. SALM ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 130. Argued January 27, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. A.bridge owned by a bridge company an
Wood v. United States
WOOD ET AL., TRADING AS PHILADELPHIA STEAM HEATING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 100. Argued January 20, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. Where a public building contract provides that no claim shall be mad
Bank of Jasper v. First National Bank
BANK OF JASPER v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ROME, GEORGIA. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JASPER, FLORIDA, v. STATE BANK OF ROME, GEORGIA. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JASPER, FLORIDA, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ROME, GEORGIA. BANK OF JASPER v. STATE BANK OF
Territory of Alaska v. Troy
TERRITORY OF ALASKA ET AL. v. TROY, COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES . POR THE DISTRICT OP ALASKA, DIVISION NO. 1. No. 392. Argued December 14, 15, 1921. Decided February 2
New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. Purdy
NEW BEDFORD DRY DOCK COMPANY v. PURDY, CLAIMANT OF THE STEAMER “ JACK-O-LANTERN.” APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 131. Argued January 27, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A contract
Reed v. Director General of Railroads
REED, ADMINISTRATRIX OF REED, v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, OPERATING PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILROAD. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 78. Argued January 13, 1922.
John Simmons Co. v. Grier Bros.
JOHN SIMMONS COMPANY v. GRIER BROTHERS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE ' ' THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 57. Argued November 8, 1921. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. A bill of review is called for only after a final decree «a
Schaff v. J. C. Famechon Co.
SCHAFF, AS RECEIVER OF THE MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY, v. J. C. FAMECHON COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 91. Argued January 16, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A decision of a state court, d
Crichton v. Wingfield
CRICHTON v. WINGFIELD. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 312. Submitted December 16, 1921. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. As a basis for-service upon an absent defendant under Jud.
Lemke v. Homer Farmers Elevator Co.
LEMKE, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, ET AL. v. HOMER FARMERS ELEVATOR COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 604. Submitted November 14, 1921. Decided Feb
Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co.
LEMKE, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, ET AL. v. FARMERS GRAIN COMPANY OF EMBDEN, NORTH DAKOTA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 456. Argued November 14, 1921. Decided February 27, 1922.
Jones v. United States
JONES v. UNITED STATES. error to the circuit court oe appeals for the ninth circuit. No. 103. Argued January 20, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. One who, in pursuance of a scheme to acquire the land for himself, procures others to make
John L. Whiting-J. J. Adams Co. v. Burrill
JOHN L. WHITING—J. J. ADAMS COMPANY v. BURRILL, TREASURER AND RECEIVER-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 113. Argued January 26, 1922. Decid
Burrill v. Locomobile Co.
BURRILL, TREASURER AND RECEIVER-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, v. LOCOMOBILE COMPANY. SAME v. RUSSELL, MILLER MILLING COMPANY. ■ERROE TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 98, 99.
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United States
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 96. Argued January 19, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A railroad after accepting and transporting without protest, as mail matter, a sh
Gooch v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
GOOCH v. OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 90. Argued January 13, 16, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. l..An agreement in a drover’s railroad pass, made pursuant to a t
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 259. Argued January 4, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. A telegraph compa
MacArthur Bros. v. United States
MacARTHUR BROTHERS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 97. Argued January 20, 1922. Decided February 27, 1922. Claimant contracted with the Government to construct a portion of a canal, both parties assuming that
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.