Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wallace v. United States
WALLACE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 118. Petition for rehearing and motion to remand for further finding. Decided April 10, 1922. The Senate, in confirming nominations to office, exercises, not a judicial, but an
Denson v. Georgia
No. 185. Jim Denson v. State of Georgia. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. Argued March 22, 1922. Decided March 27, 1922. Mr. John Randolph Cooper for plaintiff in error. Mr. George M. Napier, with whom Mr. Seward M. Smith
Hump Hairpin Manufacturing Co. v. Emmerson
HUMP HAIRPIN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. EMMERSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THfi SUPREME COURT' OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 139. Argued March 2, 3, 1922. Decided March 27, 1922. .1. Error of state authorities in
United States v. Behrman
UNITED STATES v. BEHRMAN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 582. Argued March 7, 1922 Decided March 27, 1922. 1. An exception in a statute defining an offense is met in an indictment
United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
UNITED ZINC & CHEMICAL COMPANY v. BRITT ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS EOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 164. Submitted March 13, 1922. Decided March 27, 1922. 1. A landowner owes no general duty to keep his land safe for child
Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Lucas
PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. LUCAS. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 160. Submitted March 10, 1922. Decided March 27, 1922. Where a seaman went ashore at a port of call for hospital treatment, and,
Ponzi v. Fessenden
PONZI v. FESSENDEN ET AL. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 631. Argued March 8, 9, 1922. Decided March 27, 1922. 1. Our system of state and federal jurisdiction requires a spirit of reciprocal comi
United States v. Balint
UNITED STATES v. BALINT ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 480. Argued March 7, 1922. Decided March 27, 1922. 1. Whether scienter is a necessary element of a statutory crime, t
McBride v. Idaho
No. 168. J. N. McBride v. State of Idaho. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. Submitted March 17, 1922. Decided March 20, 1922. Mr. Patrick H. Loughran and Mr. M. H. Eustace for plaintiff in error. Mr. Roy L. Black and. Mr. Al
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 20, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. Submitted March 13, 1922. Decided March 20, 1922. Mr. Walter Holland for the State of Arkansas.
Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. Siegel
EDGAR A. LEVY LEASING COMPANY, INC. v. SIEGEL. 810 WEST END AVENUE, INC. v. STERN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT'OP THE STATE OP HEW YORK. Nos. 285 and 287. Argued January 24, 25, 1922. Decided March 20, 1922. 1. Chapters 942 and 947 of the Ne
First National Bank v. J. L. Mott Iron Works
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF AIKEN v. J. L. MOTT IRON WORKS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TtlE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 159. Argued March 10, 1922. Decided March 20, 1922. A national bank, having advanced money to one who had ppntracted
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 37. Argued-March 7, 1922. Decided March 20, 1922. A gas company whose franchise obliges it to render efficient service to the
Irwin v. Wright
IRWIN v. WRIGHT, COUNTY TREASURER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. 110. Submitted January 24, 1022. Decided March 20, 1922. ]. A suit to enjoin
Winehill v. Louisiana
No. 163. Winehill & Rosenthal v. State of Louisiana. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana'. Mr. Gustave Lemle for. plaintiffs in error.' Mr. H. Garland Dupre, Mr. A. V. Coco and Mr. C. C. Friedrichs for defendant in error. S
Texas v. Eastern Texas Railroad
STATE OF TEXAS v. EASTERN TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. STATE OF TEXAS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, McCHORD ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DIST
Levinson v. United States
LEVINSON v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 145. Argued March 3, 1922. Decided March 13, 1922. 1. A suit in the nature of interpleader by the United States against one to whom it had
Atchafalaya Land Co. v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.
ATCHAFALAYA LAND COMPANY, LIMITED, ET AL. v. F. B. WILLIAMS CYPRESS COMPANY, LIMITED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 106. Argued March 3, 1922. Decided March 13, 1922. A statute limiting the time within which acti
Howat v. Kansas
HOWAT ET AL. v. STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. Nos. 154 and 491. Argued February 27, 28, 1922 Decided March 13, 1922. 1. The constitutionality of a-state statute presenting very important, questions shou
Abo Land Co. v. Tenorio
No. 143. Abo Land Company v. Roman Tenorio, Sheriff, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. Submitted March 1, 1922. Decided March 6, 1922. Mr. Bernard S. Rodey and Mr. Pearce C. Rodey for plaintiff in error. No appeara
Ex parte Cantrill
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of James C. Cantrill et al., Petitioners. March 6, 1922. Mr: Chapin Brown and Mr. Raymond Hudson for petitioners.
Newton v. Kings County Lighting Co.
NEWTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. KINGS COUNTY LIGHTING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 295. Argued January 5, 6, 1922. Decided March 6, 1922
Newton v. New York & Queens Gas Co.
NEWTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. NEW YORK & QUEENS GAS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 296. Argued January 6, 1922. Decided March 6, 1922. A
Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co.
NEWTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. NEWTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. NEW
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.