Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hattiesburg Grocery Co. v. Robertson
No. 214. Hattiesburg Grocery Company v. Stokes V. Robertson, State Revenue Agent of the State of Mississippi. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. Argued January 16, 1923. Decided January 22, 1923. Mr. Marcellus Green and
Reed v. Village of Hibbing
No. 319. Henry P. Reed et al. v. Village of Hibbing et al. Error .to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 15, 1923. Decided January 22, 1923. Mr. C. A. Severance, Mr. H. B. Pryberger, Mr
United States v. Lane
UNITED STATES v. LANE ET AL. UNITED STATES v. GULF REFINING COMPANY OF LOUISIANA. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHWESTERN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES v. GULF REFINING COMPANY OF LOUISIANA. UNITED STATES v. GREENE ET AL. UNITED STATES
Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
LEE v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 422. Argued January 5, 1923. Decided January 22, 1923. 1. A case which, by virtue of the diverse citizenshi
Bankers Trust Co. v. Blodgett
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY ET AL., EXECUTORS OF McMULLEN, v. BLODGETT, TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 169. Argued January 3, 1923. Decided January 22, 1923. 1. A state l
Winokur v. Harn
No. 244. Sam Winokur v. H. I. Harn, Sheriff, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. January 18, 1923. .Mr. A. A. Lawrence for plaintiff in error. Mr. George M.. Napier for defendant in error.
McDougall v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
No. 780. Alexander McDougall v. Oliver Iron Mining Company. January 15, 1923. Mr. Merritt Starr and Mr.. Horace G. Stone for petitioner. Mr. Frederick , P. Fish, Mr. D. Anthony Usina and Mr. Henry M. Huxley for respondent..
Baker v. United States
No. 748. G. R. Baker et al. v. United States. January 15, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Grim and Mr. Harry S.- Ridgely for the United States. ,.
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 18, Original. Argued April 25, 26, 27, 1922 Decided January 15, 1923. 1. The boundary line between the States of Texas and Oklahoma along the Red River, as deter
Snake Creek Mining & Tunnel Co. v. Midway Irrigation Co.
SNAKE CREEK MINING & TUNNEL COMPANY v. MIDWAY IRRIGATION COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 68. Argued October 17, 1922. Decided January 15, 1923. Under the law of Utah, an appropriation of
Hill v. Smith
HILL ET AL., EXECUTORS OF HILL, v. SMITH. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 164. Argued January 3, 1923. Decided January 15, 1923. 1. A federal question which was treated as open, and decided, by the State
Corvallis Creamery Co. v. Van Winkle
No. 206. Corvallis Creamery Company v. I. H. Van Winkle, Attorney General, etc., et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. January 8, 1923. Mr. Thos. É. Haven for appellant. Mr. James G. Wilson f
Ephraim v. Nevada & California Land & Live Stock Co.
No. 730. W. K. Ephraim et al. v. Nevada and California Land and Live Stock Company et al. January 8, 1923. Mr. Charles J. Kappler for petitioners. Mr. Edward ■Hohjeld for respondents.
Security Auto Lock Co. v. Perry Auto Lock Co.
No. 735. Security Auto Lock Company et al. v. Perry Auto Lock Company. January 8, 1923. Mr. Charles C. Bulkley for petitioners. Mr. Edward Rector and Mr. Glen E. Smith for respondent.
K. W. Ignition Co. v. Temco Electric Motor Company
No. 719. K. W. Ignition Company et al. v. Temco Electric Motor Company. January 8, 1923. Mr. Walter F. Murray for petitioners. Mr. H. A. Toulmin and Mr. H. A. Toulmin, Jr., for respondent.
American Railway Express Co. v. Lindenburg
AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY v. LINDENBURG. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. No. 138. Argued December 4, 1922. Decided January 8, 1923. 1. In a proceeding under the Cummins Amendment (amended by
Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CURTIS PUBLISHING COMPANY. certiorari' to the circuit court of appeals for the THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 86. Argued November 17, 1922. Decided January 8, 1923. 1. In a proceeding taken by the Federal Trade Commission, u
Koller v. United States
No. 166. H. G. Koller v. United States. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington. January 3, 1923. Mr. Dal V. Halver-stadt arid Mr. E. M. Farmer for appellant.
Board of Levee Commissioners of Orleans Levee District v. Ward
No. 603. Board of Levee Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District v. William H. Ward. January 2, 1923. Mr. Julius Henry Cohen and Mr. Arthur McGuirk for petitioner. Mr. Benjamin T. Waldo and Mr. Walter L. Gleason for respondent.
Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell
No. 196. Gorham Manufacturing Company v. James A. Wendell, Individually, etc., et al. Appeal from the District'Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Motion for substitution submitted December 11, 1922. Order ente
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 99. Submitted November 16, 1922. Decided January 2, 1923. 1. An action to recover money paid as stamp taxes under the Act of May 12, 1900, as amended J
Jeems Bayou Fishing & Hunting Club v. United States
JEEMS BAYOU FISHING & HUNTING CLUB ET AL v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. JEEMS BAYOU HUNTING & FISHING CLUB ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. ■ Nos. 119 and 137. Argued November 21, 22, 1922. Decided
Mason v. United States
MASON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. EUBANK ET AL v. UNITED STATES. MacMULLEN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. MATTHEWS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. HUNSICKER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. NORVELL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. PALMER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ARKANSAS
Stockley v. United States
STOCKLEY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 74. Argued November 20, 1922. Decided January 2, 1923. 1. Section 7 of the Act of March 3, 1891, c. 561, 26 Stat. 1099, applicable to home
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.