Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Barrack v. Town of Fairbanks
No. 798. J. E. Barrack et al. v. Town of Fairbanks, Alaska. February 26, 1923. Mr. John E. Alexander for petitioners. Mr. Alfred Sutro, Mr. E. S. Pillsbury, Mr. Frank D. Madison, Mr.,H. D. Pillsbury and Mr. Oscar Sutro for respondent.
Graham v. DuPont
No. 846. Harry T. Graham, Individually, etc., v. Alfred I. DuPont. February 26, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General Beck for petitioner. .Mr. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., and Mr. Henry P. Brown for respondent.
Apostoloff v. Hubert
No. —. Sergius Apostoloff, Appellant, v. Conrad Hubert et al. Submitted February 20, 1923. Decided February 26, 1923. Mr. Henry-E. Davis for appellant.
Davis v. L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co.
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, AS AGENT UNDER SECTION 206 OF TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920, v. L. N. DANTZLER LUMBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 228. Argued January 17, 1923. Decided Februar
Munter v. Weil Corset Co.
MUNTER v. WEIL CORSET COMPANY, INC. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT'. ‘ No. 255. Argued January 22, 1923. Decided February 26, 1923. 1. In an action on contract in.the District Court valid se
Raton Water Works Co. v. City of Raton
No. 293. Raton Water Works Company v. City of Raton. Appeal from' the District Court of the United States for the District of New Mexico. February 19, 1923. Mr. Abram J. Rose for appellant. Ne appearance for appellee.
Dillon v. People
No. 537. Frank Dillon v. People of the State of Illinois. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. February 19, 1923. Mr. Rush B. Johnson for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
Porto Rico Coal Co. v. Edwards
No. 233. Porto Rico Coal Company, Inc. v. William H. Edwards, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, etc. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. February 19, 1923. Mr. Francis W. Aymar
American Railway Express Co. v. Brabham
No. 817. American Railway Express Company et al. v. M. F. Brabham. February 19, 1923. Mr. Charles W. Stockton and Mr. K. E. Stockton for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
Wolfe v. KilLingsworth
No. 762. C. Dale Wolfe, Trustee, etc. v. G. F. Killingsworth et al. February 19, 1923. Mr. C. Dale Wolfe for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
City of Paducah v. Paducah Railway Co.
CITY OF PADUCAH ET AL. v. PADUCAH RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No. 243. Argued January 18, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A city witK power to fix the fares
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Railroad Commission
WESTERN & ATLANTIC RAILROAD v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF GEORGIA ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED'STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 195. Argued January 9, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. An order- of the D
United States v. Oklahoma
UNITED STATES v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA. IN EQUITY. No. 25, Original. Argued on motion to dismiss January 2, 1923.— Decided February 19, 1923. 1. The right to priority of payment provided for by Rev. Stats., § 3466, attaches when the conditions
Randall v. Board of Commissioners
RANDALL ET AL. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP INDIANA. No. 274. Argued January 25, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. A writ of error J,o the highest court of a State must b
Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co. v. South Carolina
COLUMBIA RAILWAY, GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE' OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 297. Argued January 26, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. Article I, § 10 of the Constitution affords no
Cramer v. United States
CRAMER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 207. Argued January 15, 16, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. Lands definitely occupied by individual Indians were excepted from the Centr
Brownlow v. Schwartz
BROWNLOW ET AL., COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL. v. SCHWARTZ. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.' No. 95. Argued January 16, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. Before allowance of a writ of error to r
United States v. Thind
UNITED STATES v. BHAGAT SINGH THIND. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 202. Argued January 11, 12, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. ,1. 'A high caste Hindu, of full Indian blood,, born at Amrit Sat, •
New England Divisions Case
THE NEW ENGLAND DIVISIONS CASE. APPEAL' PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. ■ No. 646. Argued January 9, 10, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. Section 418 of the Transportation Act, 1920, au
Price Fire & Water Proofing Co. v. United States
PRICE FIRE & WATER PROOFING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 257. Argued January 22, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. Expenses incurred by a manufacturer after termination of its work for the Government during
Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc.
LUMIERE v. MAE EDNA WILDER, INC. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 242. Argued January 18, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. Under the provision of the Copyright Act that suits “ m
Bank of America v. Whitney Central National Bank
BANK OF AMERICA v. WHITNEY CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 205. Argued January 15, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. A national bank held not suable in a Stat
Douglas v. Noble
DOUGLAS, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FOR KING COUNTY, ET AL. v. NOBLE. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 159. Argued January 2, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. The law of Washington
Valley Farms Co. v. County of Westchester
VALLEY FARMS COMPANY OF YONKERS v. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 136. Argued January 24, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A state legislature may without notice to property owners establi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.