Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Durham Public Service Co. v. City of Durham
DURHAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CITY OF DURHAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 251. Argued January 19, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A contract between a city and a street railway company should not be
United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Sullivan
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION v. SULLIVAN. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 93 and 124. Argued January 4, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. In a proceeding by an injured employee of
Minnesota Commercial Men's Ass'n v. Benn
MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL MEN’S ASSOCIATION v. BENN, EXECUTRIX OF BENN. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 103. Argued January 12, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A judgment by default rendered against a foreign c
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Wolf
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. WOLF ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 194. Argued January 9, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. Under §§ 9 and 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 24 Stat. 382;
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Steinke
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STEINKE ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH DAKOTA. No. 152. Argued December 5, 1922. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. The Act of March 3, 1875, granting railroad rights of way and • s
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
ROOKER ET AL. v. FIDELITY TRUST COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP INDIANA. No. 285. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted January 25, 1923.— Decided February 19, 1923. 1. An objection that a state statute violates th
United States Grain Corp. v. Phillips
UNITED STATES GRAIN CORPORATION v. PHILLIPS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 290. Argued January 23, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. The right of a naval -officer to a percentage on gold received on boa
Diaz v. Gonzalez
DIAZ, IN HIS OWN RIGHT, ETC., ET AL. v. CARLOTA AND CLEMENTINA GONZALEZ Y LUGO, ETC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 263. Argued January 24, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. Bower to authoriz
Moore v. Dempsey
MOORE ET AL. v. DEMPSEY, KEEPER OF THE ARKANSAS STATE PENITENTIARY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 199. Argued January 9, 1923. — Decided February 19, 1923. 1.' Upon an appeal f
Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States Railroad Labor Board
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD LABOR BOARD ET AL. APPEAL PROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 585. Argued January 11, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. Under Title III,
Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.
EIBEL PROCESS COMPANY v. MINNESOTA & ONTARIO PAPER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 178. Argued January 5, 8, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. The Eibel patent, No.'845,224, for an improvemen
Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & Machine Works
CROWN DIE & TOOL COMPANY v. NYE TOOL & MACHINE WORKS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 240. Argued January 17, 18, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A suit based on an alleged assignment of a patent
Charles Nelson Co. v. United States
CHARLES NELSON COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 287. Argued January 26, 26, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. A contract for furnishing lumber to the Government at a specified price contained a clause obliging t
Concrete Steel Co. v. Vandenburgh
CONCRETE STEEL COMPANY v. VANDENBURGH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND circuit; No. 238. Argued January 17, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. Decided upon the grounds expressed in Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co., a
Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co.
VANDENBURGH v. TRUSCON STEEL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 273. Argued January 17, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A patent cannot be extended by reissue to a field beyond its original in
Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell
GORHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. WENDELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 196. Argued, on return to rule to show
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 18, Original: State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. Submitted January 22, 1923. Decided January 29, 1923. Mr. Charles West for claimants.
A. Bourjois & Co. v. Katzel
A. BOURJOIS & COMPANY, INC. v. KATZEL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR APPEALS J-’OR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 190. Argued January 8, 1923. Decided January 29, 1923. A foreign manufaclurer and vendor of face powder soldólo the plaintiff it
Leigh Ellis & Co. v. Davis
LEIGH ELLIS & COMPANY v. DAVIS, AS AGENT, &c. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH ' • CIRCUIT. No. 246. Argued January 18, 19, 1923. Decided January 29, 1923. 1. Section 206- (a) of the Transportation Act, providing that act
Conley v. Barton
CONLEY v. BARTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OP- THE STATE OF MAINE. No. 193. Submitted January 9, 1923. Decided January 29, 1923. The obligation of a mortgage contract under which the right of redemption is barred after lapse, of
Foley v. United States
FOLEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF GATHMANN, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 203. Argued January 12, 1923. Decided January 29, 1923. 1. G wrote to the Navy Department, with respect to his invention for drying materials, that, i
Krell v. Illinois
No. 272. William F. Krell v. People of the State of Illinois. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. January 24, 1923. Mr. Bush B. Johnson for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
McCalmont v. Pennsylvania Railroad
No. 773. Dolly McCalmont, Administratrix, etc., v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. January 22, 1923. Mr. David F. Anderson for petitioner. Mr. William B. Sanders and Mr. Thomas M. Kirby for respondent
Prestonettes, Inc. v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty
No. 793. Prestonettes, Inc., v. Francois Joseph de Spoturno Coty. January 22, 1923. Mr. Charles H. Tuttle and Mr. William J. Hughes for petitioner. Mr. Hugo Mock and Mr. Asher Blum for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.