Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eickel v. Robinson
No. 964. Albert Eickel, Bankrupt, v. A. Robinson, Trustee of the Estate of Albert Eickel, Bankrupt. June 4, 1923. Mr. Thomas W. Gregory for petitioner. Mr. George E. Shelley for respondent.
Keller v. Adams Campbell Co.
No. 1039. Clarence D. Keller et al., etc. v. Adams Campbell Company, Inc., et al. June 4, 1923. Mr. Charles E. Townsend for petitioners. No appearance for respondents.
Ex parte Rumsey
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the matter of Jesse C. Rumsey, petitioner. June 4, 1923. Mr. Jesse C. Rumsey pro se.
Ex parte Woodhouse
No. —, Original.. Ex parte: In the matter of Henry Woodhouse, etc., petitioner. June 4, 1923. Mr. Henry Woodhouse pro se.
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 18, Original. Order entered June 4, 1923. Order directing Commissioners, heretofore appointed for locating and marking the boundary between Texas and Oklahoma on
Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
MADERA SUGAR PINE COMPANY v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. Nos. 235 and 296. Argued March 7, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. 1. A state workmen’s compensa
William C. Atwater & Co. v. United States
WILLIAM C. ATWATER & COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 218. Argued May 1, 2, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. Decided on the authority of Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United States, ante, 489. 56 Ct. Clms. 458,
Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United States
WILLARD, SUTHERLAND & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 209. Argued May 1, 2, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. 1. A contract for the purchase of coal by the Government at a stated price per ton which does not require
Massachusetts v. Mellon
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. MELLON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL. FROTHINGHAM v. MELLON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL. IN EQUITY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 24, Original, and No. 962. Argu
Brush Electric Co. v. City of Galveston
BRUSH ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY OF GALVESTON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 179. Argued April 18, 19, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. A decree of the District Court refusing pre
Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Mayor of College Park
GEORGIA RAILWAY & POWER COMPANY ET AL. v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE PARK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 464. Argued April 24, 25, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. 1. A state statute extending the limits o
Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Town of Decatur
GEORGIA RAILWAY & POWER COMPANY ET AL. v. TOWN OF DECATUR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 463. Argued April 24, 25, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. 1. A judgment of a State Supreme Court which does not terminate the lit
Collins v. Loisel
COLLINS v. LOISEL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. No. 880. Argued May 4, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. 1. The provision o
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Daughton
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. DAUGHTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. SAME. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. APPEALS
Bartels v. Iowa
BARTELS v. STATE OF IOWA. BOHNING v. STATE OF OHIO. POHL v. STATE OF OHIO. NEBRASKA DISTRICT OF EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD OF MISSOURI, OHIO, AND OTHER STATES, ET AL. v. McKELVIE ET AL., ETC. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA.
Meyer v. Nebraska
MEYER v. STATE OF NEBRASKA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF.THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 325. Argued February 23, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. A state law forbidding, under penalty, the teaching in any private, denominational, parochial or publi
United States v. American Linseed Oil Co.
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN LINSEED OIL COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 307. Argued April 25, 26, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. For the avowed purpose of substituting
First National Bank of San Jose v. California
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SAN JOSE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 276. Submitted April 13, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. A state law providing for the escheat to the State of bank deposit
Houston Coal Co. v. United States
HOUSTON COAL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 365. Argued April 10, 1923. Decided June 4, 1923. Section 10 of the Lever Act grants jurisdiction to the District
Burns Bros. v. Steam Tug Interstate No. 1
No. 1048. Burns Bros. v. Steam Tug Interstate No. 1, Her Engines, etc., et al. May 21, 1923. Mr. Mark Ash and Mr. Edward Ash for petitioner. Mr. George V. A. McCloskey for respondents.
Perkins Glue Co. v. Standard Furniture Co.
No. 1010. Perkins Glue Company v. Standard Furniture Company. May 21, 1923. Mr. Thomas Ewing and Mr. Gorham Crosby for petitioner. Mr. James A. Watson for respondent.
City of Los Angeles v. Mono Power Co.
No. 973. City of Los Angeles et al. v. Mono Power Company et al. May 21, 1923. Mr. W. B. Mathews for petitioners. Mr. Charles F. Potter for respondents.
Davis v. Cornwell
No. 1004. James C. Davis, Agent, etc. v. R. L. Cornwell. May 21, 1923. Mr. I. Parker Veazey, Jr., and Mr. A. A. McLaughlin for petitioner. Mr. Edwin L. Norris and Mr. George E. Hurd for respondent.
Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Columbus v. Davis
No. 915. Young Men’s Christian Association of Columbus, Ohio, et al. v. Ora Davis et al. May 21, 1923. Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., Mr.Uenry A. Williams, Mr. Guy W. Mallon and Mr. James I. Boulger for petitioners. Mr. Arthur I. Vorys for responden
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.