Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Leecraft v. Texas Co.
No. 629. A. N. Leecraft v. Texas Company. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted April 30, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. Mr. George F. Short and Mr. C. W. King for plaintiff in error. Mr. C.
McCarthy v. Arndstein
McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, v. ARNDSTEIN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 404. Argued April 11, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. A discl
Campbell v. City of Olney
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF OLNEY. ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OP YOUNG COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS. No. 266. Submitted April 20, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Unless a federal right is involved, a state court’s application of the local laws will not be
International Life Insurance v. Sherman
INTERNATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SHERMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 295. Argued March 15, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. Stockholders of a corporation equitably owning the stock of an insurance company bro
United States v. New River Collieries Co.
UNITED STATES v. NEW RIVER COLLIERIES COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 316. Argued March 7, 8, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Under § 10 of-the Lever Act and the Fifth Amendment, the owner of propert
L. Vogelstein & Co. v. United States
L. VOGELSTEIN & COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 269. Argued March 5, 6, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. Just compensation for copper taken by the United States for war purposes under the Act of June 3, 1916,
Riddle v. Dyche
RIDDLE v. DYCHE, WARDEN OF THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT ATLANTA, GEORGIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 663. Argued April 12, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. The objection
South Utah Mines & Smelters v. Beaver County
SOUTH UTAH MINES & SMELTERS v. BEAVER COUNTY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. No. 321. Argued March 15, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. In an action at law tried by the District Court without a jury
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. State
NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY ET AL. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE ET AL. UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. STATE OF TENNESSEE ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OP TEN
Davis v. Farmers Co-operative Equity Co.
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, AS AGENT, ETC. v. FARMERS CO-OPERATIVE EQUITY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 270. Argued April 17, 18, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Solicitation of traffic by railr
State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 158. Argued December 8, 1922. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Rates fixed by st
Ex parte Davis
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ETC., PETITIONER. PETITION POR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR MANDAMUS. No. 27, Original. Argued on return to rule to show cause April 16, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Where t
Hart v. B. F. Keith Vaudeville Exchange
HART v. B. F. KEITH VAUDEVILLE EXCHANGE ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 763. Argued May 2, 3, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. A bill in the District Court setting up a cla
Stevens v. Arnold
STEVENS v. ARNOLD ET AL., EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES OF NIRDLINGER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 200. Argued May 2, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. A suit under 4 N. J. Comp. Stat. p. 5399, to determine t
Tulsidas v. Insular Collector of Customs
DHARANDAS TULSIDAS ET AL. v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 77. Submitted May 2, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. A decision of the duly constituted immigration authorities holding
Graham v. du Pont
GRAHAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS FORMER COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL. v. du PONT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 846. Argued April 30, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Under § 3224, Rev. Stats., feder
Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Lyndon
WAGNER ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. LYNDON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES * FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 738. Motion to dismiss submitted April 30, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Where the Distr
Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United States
CURTIS, COLLINS & HOLBROOK COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. (And Twenty-three Other Cases.) APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 341, and Nos. 342-364. Argued April 9, 10, 1923. Decided May 21, 1923. 1. Where stockh
American Steel Foundries v. Robertson
AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. ROBERTSON, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, AND SIMPLEX ELECTRIC HEATING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 291. Argued April 19, 1923. Decided May 21,
Work v. United States ex rel. McAlester-Edwards Co.
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF THE CHICKASAW NATION, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES EX REL. Mc-ALESTER-EDWARDS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 258. Argued April 12, 1923. Decided Ma
Davis v. Long
No. 1002. James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc. v. Ellen A. Long, Administratrix, etc. May 7, 1923. Mr. Charles C. Paulding and Mr. Leroy B. Williams for petitioner. Mr. George H. Bond and Mr. A. Lee Olmsted for respondent.
Four-in-one Coal Co. v. Brown
No. 954. Four-in-one Coal Company v. Eli H. Brown. May 7, 1923. Mr. Emile Steinfeld and Mr. D. A. Sachs, Jr., for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Taggarts Paper Co. v. New York
No. 96. Taggarts Paper Company v. State of New York. Error to the Court of Claims of the State of New York. Argued April 26, 27, 1923. Decided May 7, 1923. Mr. Adelbert Moot and Mrs. Helen Z. M. Rodgers, with whom Mr. William L. Marcy was o
Begg v. City of New York
BEGG ET AL., RECEIVERS OF MANHATTAN & QUEENS TRACTION CORPORATION, v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 5. Argued April 13, 16, 1923. Decided May 7, 1923. When an application is mad
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.