Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lynch v. Tilden Produce Co.
LYNCH, EXECUTRIX OF LYNCH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, DECEASED, v. TILDEN PRODUCE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 139. Argued January 25, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. The Act of May 9, 1
Commissioner of Immigration v. Gottlieb
COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION OF PORT OF NEW YORK v. GOTTLIEB ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued April 15, 16, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. When the plain words of a statute leave no ro
Missouri ex rel. Barrett v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.
STATE OF MISSOURI ON THE RELATION OF BARRETT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY. KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. STATE OF KANSAS ON THE RELATION OF HELM, ATTORNEY FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
United States ex rel. Chicago, New York & Boston Refrigerator Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
UNITED STATES EX REL. CHICAGO, NEW YORK & BOSTON REFRIGERATOR COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 288. Argued May 2, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. A car company whose busin
United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.
UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. ABILENE & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 456. Argued March 4, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. An order m
Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Co.
NASSAU SMELTING & REFINING WORKS, LTD. v. BRIGHTWOOD BRONZE FOUNDRY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 242. Argued April 28, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. A creditor whose claim was included in the
Adams Express Co. v. Darden
ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY v. DARDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 226. Argued April 22, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. A judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals in a case involving the liability of a carrier
Davis v. Donovan
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, AS AGENT UNDER SECTION 206 OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920, v. DONOVAN, AS OWNER OF THE DECK SCOW “MARY ETHEL,” ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 757. Argue
Hixon v. Oakes
HIXON v. OAKES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 420. Argued April 24, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. A city ordinance forbidding the filling of prescriptions calling for m
Weiss v. Stearn
WEISS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. STEARN. WEISS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. WHITE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 262 and 263. Argued April 30, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. Pursuant to an
Wong Doo v. United States
WONG DOO v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 736. Argued April 10, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. The strict doctrine of res judicata does not apply to habeas corpus. Salinger v. Loisel, a
Salinger v. Loisel
SALINGER, JR. v. LOISEL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. SAME v. SAME. SALINGER, JR. v. UNITED STATES, AND LOISEL, AS UNITED STATES MARSHAL, EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE
Davis v. Corona Coal Co.
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, AS AGENT OF THE UNITED STATES, v. CORONA COAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OE APPEAL OE THE PARISH OE ORLEANS OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 819. Argued May 5, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. An action
City of Opelika v. Opelika Sewer Co.
CITY OF OPELIKA v. OPELIKA SEWER COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 524. Argued April 8, 9, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. A public service Corporation is bound by rates fixe
Illinois Central Railroad v. United States
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 248. Argued April 28, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. For the purpose of securing the reduced rates for transportation of its property over land-grant rail
Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall
HOME TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF SPOKANE v. KUYKENDALL, AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. Nos. 539 and 790. Argued April 17, 1
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall
PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. KUYKENDALL, AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. Nos. 540 and 789. Argued April 17, 1924. Dec
United States v. Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co.
UNITED STATES v. SUPPLEE-BIDDLE HARDWARE COMPANY APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 477. Argued April 9, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. The “Revenue Act of 1918” (passed February 24, 1919), in the income tax provisions applicable to corpo
Hammerschmidt v. United States
HAMMERSCHMIDT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 254. Argued April 29, 30, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. Section 37 of the Criminal Code (Rev. Stats., § 5440) punishing conspiracy
United States ex rel. Baldwin Co. v. Robertson
UNITED STATES EX RELATIONE THE BALDWIN COMPANY v. ROBERTSON, AS COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, AND R. S. HOWARD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 251. Argued April 29, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. A decr
United States v. Ferris
UNITED STATES v. FERRIS. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 217. Argued April 8, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. An army officer was not “serving with troops operating against an enemy,” within the meaning of § 7 of the Act of April 26, 1898,
Orinoco Co. v. Orinoco Iron Co.
No. 1018. ORINOCO Company, Limited, et al. v. Orinoco Iron Company. May 12, 1924. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. William R. Harr and Mr. Edward S. Duvall for appellee. Mr. George N. Baxter for appellants.
United States v. Sugarland Industries
No. 956. United States, Owner of Steamship Lake Fairlie, etc. v. Sugarland Industries et al. May 12, 1924. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Ottinger and Mr. J. Frank Staley for the United States. No appearance for
Hecht v. Malley
HECHT ET AL., TRUSTEES, v. MALLEY, FORMER COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. HOWARD ET AL., TRUSTEES, v. MALLEY, FORMER COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. HOWARD ET AL., TRUSTEES, v. CASEY, FORMER ACTING COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. CROCKER ET AL
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.