Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States
BROOKS-SCANLON CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. BROOKS-SCANLON CORPORATION. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Nos. 367, 385. Argued January 8, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. 1. Orders of the Emergency Fleet Corporation directed t
Transportes Maritimos do Estado v. Almeida
TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS DO ESTADO v. ALMEIDA. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 265. Submitted April 30, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. 1. The defense of sovereign immunity by a defendant
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. Wells
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. WELLS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 232. Argued April 23, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. 1. The rolling stock of a railroad, and traffic balances owi
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Prude
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. PRUDE. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME. COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 272. Submitted May 1, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. 1. A decision ofva State Supreme Court denying an interstate carrier an i
New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Telegraph Co. v. Dolan
NEW YORK, PHILADELPHIA & NORFOLK TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. DOLAN, COLLECTOR OF TAXES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF WILMINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF DELAWARE. No. 275. Argued May 2, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. The
Ex parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF SKINNER & EDDY CORPORATION, PETITIONER. PETITION POE A WRIT OP MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION TO THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 28, Original. Argued, on return to rule to show cause, April 14, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. 1. Th
Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co.
NEWTON, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 565. Argued March 4, 1924. Decided May 12,
Milam v. United States
No. 982. Louis Milam et al. v. United States. May 5, 1924. Mr. Robert H. Talley for petitioners. No brief filed for the United States.
Donegan v. United States
No. 960. Arthur E. Donegan v. United States. May 5, 1924. Mr. Alexander Akerman and Mr. W. M. Toomer for petitioner. No brief filed for the United States.
Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Lee
No. 941. Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Company v. Albert E. Lee, Receiver. May 5, 1924. Mr. Henry E. Warner for petitioner. Mr. Philip N. Jones for respondent.
Pluto Oil & Gas Co. v. Miller
No. 734. Pluto Oil & Gas Company et al. v. H. C. Miller. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Motion to dismiss submitted April 28, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. Mr. L. 0. Lyle, Mr. W. V. Pryor, and Mr. D. A. McDougal, for defe
Neil v. Utah Wholesale Grocery Co.
No. 259. J. W. Neil v. Utah Wholesale Grocery Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Utah. Submitted April 28, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. Mr. William R. Andrews and Mr. Joseph Chez for plaintiff in error. Mr. Jacob Evans and Mr
Davis v. Hareford
No. 241. James C. Davis, as Agent, etc. v. Charles Hareford. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. Argued April 28, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. Mr. A. A. McLaughlin, with whom Mr. Thos. B. Pryor and Mr. Vincent M. Mills were o
Bulloch v. Dermott-Collins Road Improvement District
No. 194. C. E. Bulloch et al. v. Dermott-Collins Road Improvement District et al. Error to- the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. Submitted January 25, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. Mr. Joe S. Harris for plaintiffs in error. No appearanc
Standard Oil Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.
No. 607. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. Southern Pacific Company et al. Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion submitted April 28, 1924. Order entered May 5, 1924.
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 15, Original. Orders entered May 5, 1924. 1. Order to show cause why prosecution of an action brought against the receiver in this case should not be enjoined. 2
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA*. No. 187. Argued January 22, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. 1. A State constitutionally
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CENTRAL IRON & COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 198. Argued February 19, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. 1. No contract of a carrier can reduce the amount o
Hester v. United States
HESTER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 243. Submitted April 24, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. 1. In a prosecution for concealing spirits, admission of testimony
Cook v. Tait
COOK v. TAIT, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MARYLAND. No. 220. Argued April 15, 1924. Decided May 5, 1924. Congress has power t
United States ex rel. Gates v. Harshberger
No. 985. United States to the use of Sue P. Gates v. Frank M. Harshberger et al. April 28, 1924. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Beck for defendants in error. No appearance for plaintiff in error.
United States ex rel. Dong Yick Yuen v. Dunton
No. 961. United States ex rel. Dong Yick Yuen v. John F. Dunton, Chinese Inspector, etc. April 28, 1924. Mr. Roger O’Donnell for petitioner. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. George Ross Hull for respondent.
William A. Brown & Co. v. United States
No. 946. William A. Brown & Company et al. v. United States. April 28, 1924. Mr. B. A. Levett and Mr. Allan B. Brown for petitioners. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoppin for the United States.
McGovern v. City of Boston
No. 918. Patrick McGovern et al., etc. v. City of Boston. April 28, 1924. Mr. John F. Cronan for petitioners. Mr. E. Mark Sullivan and Mr. Samuel Silverman for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.