Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Horine v. United States
No. 984. Harry A. Horine et al. v. United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. April 28, 1924. Mr. Harry A. Horine and Mr. Sam Goslinsky for petitioners. No brief filed for the Uni
Pierce v. Drainage District No. 17
No. 239. E. L. Pierce et al. v. Drainage District No. 17, Mississippi County, Arkansas. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. Argued April 25, 1924. Decided April 28, 1924. Mr. Arthur T. Brewster, with whom Mr. Jesse C. Shepp
Owens v. United States
No. 235. Henry D. Owens v. United States. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Submitted April 22, 1924. Decided April 28, 1924. Mr. Horace S. Whitman and Mr. William L. Marbury for appellant. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Assistant Attorney
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Eiser
SUPREME LODGE, KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS, v. EISER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NEBRASKA. No. 215. Argued March 12, 1924. Decided April 28, 1924. Decided upon the authority of Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, ante, 30. 10
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
SUPREME LODGE, KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS, v. MEYER. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 214. Argued March 12, 1924. Decided April 28, 1924. 1. WhEe proceedings in the federal courts are not within the terms of A
Missouri ex rel. Burnes National Bank of St. Joseph v. Duncan
STATE OF MISSOURI AT THE RELATION OF THE BURNES NATIONAL BANK OF ST. JOSEPH v. DUNCAN, JUDGE OF THE PROBATE COURT OF BUCHANAN COUNTY, MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 762. Argued April 11, 1924. Decided Apr
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Osborne
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. OSBORNE, AS TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, ET AL. CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. OSBORNE, AS STATE TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, ET AL. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL,
Cunningham v. Brown
CUNNINGHAM, TRUSTEE OF PONZI, v. BROWN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 213. Argued March 12, 1924. Decided April 28, 1924. 1. Where a person obtained money by fraudulent representations from many
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 15. Original. Order entered April 25, 1924. Order that reports by commissioners, with accompanying maps, respecting the running, etc., of the boundary line along
Crawford County Levee & Drainage District No. 1 v. Hutson
No. 948. Crawford County Levee & Drainage District No. 1 v. J. R. Hutson et al. April 21, 1924. Mr. Charles E. Buell and Mr. Frank W. Lucas for petitioner. Mr. Harry L. Butler for respondents.
Detroit Carrier & Manufacturing Co. v. Perrin
No. 914. Detroit Carrier & Manufacturing Company v. John G. Perrin. April 21, 1924. Mr. Melville Church for petitioner. Mr. Albert M. Austin for respondent.
Randolph v. Bouker Contracting Co.
No. 897. John Randolph, Administrator, etc., et al. v. Bouker Contracting Company, as Owner of Scow 84-H. April 21, 1924. Mr. Herman S. Hertwig for petitioners. Mr. George V. A. McCloskey for respondent.
Clinton v. Gypsy Oil Co.
No. 739. Wilson Clinton, an incompetent, by Edmond Hill, his next friend and guardian, et al. v. Gypsy Oil Company. April 21, 1924. Mr. Horace H. Hagan, for plaintiffs in error, in support of the petition. Mr. James B. Diggs for defendant i
United States ex rel. Patton v. Tod
No. 917. United States ex rel. Hyman Patton, etc. v. Robert E. Tod, as Commissioner of Immigration. April 21, 1924. Mr. A. S. Gilbert for petitioner. No brief filed for respondent.
United States v. Valante
UNITED STATES v. VALANTE. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 218. Argued April 8, 1924. Decided April 21, 1924. Defendant, having been tried for a misdemeanor before one federal ju
Davis v. Cornwell
DAVIS, AS AGENT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920, v. CORNWELL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 297. Argued February 26, 1924. Decided April 21, 1924. A contract by a rai
Hoffman v. McClelland
HOFFMAN ET AL. v. McCLELLAND, JR., ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS, TRANSFERRED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 190. Argued January 23, 1924. Decided
Chastleton Corp. v. Sinclair
THE CHASTLETON CORPORATION ET AL. v. SINCLAIR ET AL., RENT COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 467. Argued March 12, 13, 1924. Decided April 21, 1924. 1. The remed
Southeastern Express Co. v. Robertson
SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. ROBERTSON, STATE REVENUE AGENT, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 216. Submitted April 7, 1924. Decided April 21, 1924. Decided upon the
Southeastern Express Co. v. Robertson
SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. ROBERTSON, STATE REVENUE AGENT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 201. Argued March 5, 1924. Decided April 21, 1924. 1. An objection that a state taxing statute violated due process
Winkelman v. Winkelman
No. 889. John E. Winkelman v. Laura M. Winkelman. April 14, 1924. Mr. John E. Hughes for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
E. W. Clark & Co. v. Slaymaker
No. 874. E. W. Clark & Company v. Augusta M. Slaymaker et al. April 14, 1924. Mr. Joseph S. Clark, Mr. T. R. White and Mr. Taljowrd P. Linn for petitioner. Mr. Edward C. Turner, Mr. Albert M. Calland, Mr. F. S. Monnett and Mr. David F. Pugh
Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Werner
No. 504. Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Wilhelmina Werner et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. Argued April 11, 1924. Decided April 14, 1924. Mr. Edward A. Walters, with whom Mr. Oliver O. Haga and Mr.
Ex parte Government of the Republic of Portugal
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the matter of the Government of the Republic of Portugal, et al., Petitioners. Submitted April 7, 1924. Decided April 14, 1924. Mr. F. Dudley Kohler for petitioners.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.