Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ebert v. Poston
EBERT ET AL. v. POSTON. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 153. Argued December 12, 1924. Decided January 12, 1925. 1. Subsections 2 and 3 of § 302 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of March 8, 1918,
Tod v. Waldman
TOD, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, v. WALDMAN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 95. Petition for rehearing. Decided January 12, 1925. Memorandum on petition for rehearing, adding to directions here
Shafer v. Farmers Grain Co.
No. 34. George F. Shafer, Attorney General of the State of North Dakota, et al. v. Farmers Grain Company of Embden et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of North Dakota. Argued May 4, 1923. Order entere
State v. State
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Order entered January 5, 1925. Order receiving report of Commissioners on the survey, location and marking of a part of the Texas-Oklahoma boundary
L. Richardson & Co. v. United States
L. RICHARDSON & COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 142. Argued December 10, 11, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. Allegations of a petition in the Court of Claims held insufficient to show an agreement upon th
Kunhardt & Co. v. United States
KUNHARDT & COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 141. Argued December 10, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. In order to comply with the demand of government officials that it deliver goods at a port in this co
United States v. Morrow
UNITED STATES v. MORROW. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 98. Argued October 21, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. Although a proviso is sometimes used to introduce independent legislation, the presumption is that, in accordance with it
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Groeger
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. GROEGER, ADMINISTRATRIX OF GROEGER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 113. Argued October 24, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. Section 2 of the Boiler Inspection Act,
Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United States
ERIE COAL & COKE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 78. Argued October 15, 16, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. Where by the terms and conditions set forth in the advertisement of a public sale of public pro
Norton v. Larney
NORTON ET AL. v. LARNEY, A MINOR, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 146. Submitted December 8, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. An averment in a bill to quiet title to a Creek Indian allotment that
Webster v. Fall
WEBSTER v. FALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA No. 149. Argued December 11, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. A suit lacking a necessary party defe
Farmers & Mechanics National Bank v. Wilkinson
FARMERS & MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, v. WILKINSON, TRUSTEE, AND THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 487. Motion to dismiss submitted October 6, 19
Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman
HYGRADE PROVISION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. SHERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. LEWIS & FOX COMPANY v. SHERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. SATZ v. SHERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
Law v. United States
LAW v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 550. Argued December 8, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. A judgment of the District Court based on a general finding for the plaintiff in a law case tri
United States Bedding Co. v. United States
UNITED STATES BEDDING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 143. Argued December 11, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. Plaintiff, alleging that it had retained possession of its goods because of a circular of the War I
Morrison v. Work
MORRISON, JR., ET AL. v. WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 112. Argued October 24, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. A suit to enjoin the Secretary of the Interior and
United States v. Village of Hubbard
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. VILLAGE OF HUBBARD, OHIO. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. CITY OF WELLSVILLE, OHIO. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 25 and 26. Argued April 22, 1924; restored to d
Compagnie Internationale de Produits Alimentaires S. A. v. Miller
COMPAGNIE INTERNATIONALE DE PRODUITS ALIMENTAIRES S. A. v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF . COLUMBIA. No. 412. Argued November 25, 1924. Decided January 5
Behn, Meyer & Co. v. Miller
BEHN, MEYER & COMPANY, LIMITED, v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 343. Argued November 24, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. A corporation o
Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Dahl
ROBINS DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY v. DAHL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 316. Argued December 4, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. An injury suffered by a workman while repairing a completed vessel afloat in naviga
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. United States
THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 212. Argued November 19, 1924. Decided January 5, 192
Fullerton-Krueger Lumber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
FULLERTON-KRUEGER LUMBER COMPANY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Nos. 152 and 179. Argued December 12, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. A statute should not be
Panoil
THE PANOIL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 'FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 139. Argued December 10, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. The District Court has not admiralty jurisdiction of a libel in rem against
Sanitary District of Chicago v. United States
SANITARY DISTRICT OF CHICAGO v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 161. Argued December 8, 9, 1924. Decided January 5, 1925. 1. A suit to enjoin an agency of the Sta
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.