Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Austin Nichols & Co. v. Steamship "Isla de Panay"
AUSTIN NICHOLS & COMPANY v. STEAMSHIP “ISLA DE PANAY,” HER ENGINES, ETC., ET AL. SANCHEZ ET AL., COPARTNERS, TRADING AS E. SANCHEZ & COMPANY, v. STEAMSHIP “ISLA DE PANAY,” HER ENGINES, ETC., ET AL. E. TOLIBIA & COMPANY v. STEAMSHIP “ISLA DE
Browne v. Union Pacific Railroad
BROWNE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT' OF THE STATE. OF KANSAS. ■ No. 194. Argued January 19, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. A purchaser of interstate shipments of grain sued the carrier for damages alleged
A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.
A. B. SMALL COMPANY v. LAMBORN & COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 100. Argued October 21, 22, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Contracts for the sale of sugar considered and
A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.
A. B. SMALL COMPANY v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 101. Argued October 22, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Written, orders for goods, addressed
Fort Smith Spelter Co. v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co.
FORT SMITH SPELTER COMPANY v. CLEAR CREEK OIL & GAS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 266. Submitted January 28, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. Where a private gas company, empowered to become a public service
Kaplan v. Tod
KAPLAN v. TOD, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 241. Argued January 26, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Section 2172 of the Revised Statutes, by whic
Stein v. Tip-Top Baking Co.
STEIN ET AL., DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF STEIN, HALL & COMPANY, ETC. v. TIP-TOP BAKING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 177. Submitted January 14, 1925. Decided M
Flanagan v. Federal Coal Co.
FLANAGAN v. FEDERAL COAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE TEN- . ■ NESSEE. No. 75. Argued October 15, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. A contract of sale between two coal dealers for delivery of coal . by the one to t
United States v. Steamship "COAMO"
UNITED STATES v. STEAMSHIP “COAMO,” HER ENGINES, ETC., ET AL. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued October 8, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. Section 10 of the Immigration Act, 1917, makes it
Pennsylvania System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Pennsylvania Railroad
PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS ETC. v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 629. Argued January 13, 1925. Decide
Pennsylvania Railroad System & Allied Lines Federation No. 90 v. Pennsylvania Railroad
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD SYSTEM AND ALLIED LINES FEDERATION NO. 90, ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 661. Argued January 13, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Sin
Samuels v. McCurdy
SAMUELS v. McCURDY, SHERIFF OF DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 225. Argued January 22, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. A State law (Georgia Ls. 1917, Ex. Sess.) making it unlawful'for a person
Work v. United States ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. CHESTATEE PYRITES & CHEMICAL CORPORATION. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 401. Argued November 26, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Where the' answer
Work v. United States ex rel. Rives
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR v. UNITED STATES EX REL. RIVES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS 0^ THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 272. Argued November 25, 26, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Where the duties imposed upon an executive office
Carroll v. United States
CARROLL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP. THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 15. Argued December 4, 1923; restored to docket for,reargument January 28, 1924; .reargued March 14,1924. Decided M
Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. Smart
MERCHANTS MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SMART. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 223. Argued January 22, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. • A state law (N. Y. Laws 1918, e. 182) required that any policy
Nahmeh v. United States
NAHMEH v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 157. Argued January 6, 1925. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. Ündét the Suits in Admiralty Act, suit against the United States
Ex parte Grossman
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP GROSSMAN, PETITIONER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT-OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 24, Original. Argued December 1, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. 1. A criminal contempt, committ
James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United States
JAMES SHEWAN & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT 'OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 42. Argued October 7, 8, 1924. Decided March 2, 1925. A libelant whose libel against the United St
Kuras v. Michigan Central Railroad
No. 863. Mary Kuras, Administratrix, etc., v. Michigan Central Railroad Company. February 2, 1925. Mr. Frank S. Monnett for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Duffy v. Pitney
No. 827. Charles V. Duffy, Former Collector, etc v. John O. H. Pitney et al., Executors, etc. February 2, 1925. Mr. Solicitor General Beck for petitioner. Mr. Corwin Howell for respondents.
Ex parte Barker
No. —, Original. Ex parte Barker. February 2, 1925.
Tayloe v. United States
No. 242. Forrest P. Tayloe v. United States. Appeal FROM the Court op Claims. Argued January 26, 1925. Decided February 2, 1925. Mr. Harry Peyton for appellant. Mr. Alfred A. ■ Wheat, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Sol
Indian Refining Co. v. Taylor
No. 760. Indian Refining Company v. John C. Taylor. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Motion to dismiss submitted January 26, 1925. Decided February 2, 1925. Mr. U. S. Lesh, for defendant in error, in support of the motion
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.