Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Morse v. United States
BENJAMIN W. MORSE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. HARRY F. MORSE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Nos. 597 and 598. Argued January 9, 1925. Decided
Standard Oil Co. v. United States
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, AS OWNER, ETC., OF THE STEAMSHIP LLAMA, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. CERTIORARI TO THE' CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEARS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. ' No. 169. Argued January 14, 1925. Decided February 2, 1925. 1.
Swiss National Insurance v. Miller
SWISS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED v. THOMAS W. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, AND FRANK WHITE, AS TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 132. Argued November 18, 1924.
Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Belshe
No. 253. Seaboard Air Line Railway Company v. O. T. Belshe. January 26, 1925. on motion of Mr. Murray Allen for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Clyde A. Douglass, Mr. William C. Douglass and Mr. Robert N. Simms for defendant in error.
Walbridge-Aldinger Co. v. Rudd
No. 823. Walbridge-Aldinger Company v. A. J. Rudd et al. January 26, 1925. Mr. Charles West and Mr.. Everett Petry for petitioner. Mr. I. L. Underwood, Mr. William F. Tucker and Mr. Huletle F. Aby for respondents.
Moore v. United States
No. 811. E. N. Moore et al. v. United States. January 26, 1925. Mr. Robert Ash for petitioners. The Attorney General for the United States.
Davis v. Weiss
No. 771. James C. Davis, Agent, etc., v. Abraham Weiss, Administrator, etc. January 26, 1925. Mr. Arthur W. Blackman for petitioner. Mr. Benjamin Ra-balsky for respondent.
Clay v. District Court of the Twelfth District of the State of Colorado
No. 221. John Clay et al., Copartners, etc., v. The District Court of the Twelfth District of the State of Colorado, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado. Argued January 22, 1925. Decided January 26, 1925. Mr. P. A. Well
New Mexico v. Colorado
THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO v. THE STATE OF COLORADO. IN EQUITY. No. 12 Original. Argued December 2, 3, 1924. Decided January 26, 1925. 1. A line surveyed and marked in 1868 as the location of the parallel designated as the - common boundary of
Direction Der Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United States Steel Corp.
DIRECTION DER DISCONTO-GESELLSCHAFT v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, PUBLIC TRUSTEE, EGREMONT JOHN MILLS, ET AL. BANK FÜR HANDEL UND INDUSTRIE v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, PUBLIC TRUSTEE, ENGLISH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN BOND AND S
Lederer v. Fidelity Trust Co.
EPHRAIM LEDERER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. FIDELITY TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 184. Argued January 15, 16, 1925. Decided J
Bartlett v. United States
No. 217. Bartlett & Kling v. United States. Argued for appellant January 21, 1925. Decided January 21, 1925. Mr. Benj. Carter for appellant..' Solicitor General Beck and. Mr. Merrill E. Otis, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for t
Sagamore Coal Co. v. Mountain Water Supply Co.
Nos. 792 to 799. Sagamore Coal Company et al. v. The Mountain Water Supply Company and others. January 19, 1925. Mr. Edwin W. Smith, Mr. E. C. Higbee and Mr. William M. Robinson for petitioners. Mr. George W. Woodruff, Mr. George E. Alter a
Chrisp v. Davis
No. 165. O. H. Chrisp v. James C. Davis, Director General, As Agent. Error to the Supreme Court of the State' of Arkansas. Submitted January 14, 1925. Decided January 19, 1925. Mr. Leslie C. Garnett and Mr. J. Merrick Moore for plaintiff in
College Point Boat Corp. v. United States
COLLEGE POINT BOAT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 121. Argued November 17, 1924. Decided January 19, 1925. 1. Claimant’s preparations to perform its contract for furnishing supplies to the Navy were stopp
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Orders entered January 19, 1925. Receivership Orders: 1 and 2. For payments to Kirby Petroleum Company by way of reimbursement for expense of drill
Guardian Savings & Trust Co. v. Road Improvement District No. 7
GUARDIAN SAVINGS & TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 7 OF POINSETT COUNTY, ARKANSAS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 389. Argued January 8, 1925. Decided January 19, 1925. When s
Carr v. Alexsen
No. 173. Walter Carr v. A. Alexsen, Master, et al. January 14, 1925. Mr. Harry K. Wolcott and Mr. Daniel Coleman also appeared for the appellant. No appearance for appellee.
United States ex rel. Fink v. Tod
No. 698. United States ex rel. Fink v. Tod, Commissioner of Immigration. January 13, 1925. upon confession of error by Solicitor General Beck, for respondent. Mr. Max. J. Kohler and Mr. Louis Marshall for petitioner.
Durez Co. v. Bakelite Corp.
No. 818. Durez Company, Inc. v. Bakelite Corporation. January 12, 1925. Mr. George E. Cruse for petitioner. Mr. Charles Neave for respondent.
Ne-Kah-Wah-She-Tun-Kah v. Work
No. 156. Ne-Kah-Wah-She-Tun-Kah et al. v. Hubert Work, Secretary of the Interior, et al. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Argued January 5, 1925. Decided January 12, 1925. Mr. Preston A. Shinn for appellants. Mr
Ex parte Durez Co.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the matter of Durez Company, Inc., petitioner. Submitted January 5, 1925. Decided January 12, 1925. Mr. Alan N. Mann and Mr. George E. Cruse for petitioner.
Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Duke
MICHIGAN PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ET AL. v. DUKE, DOING BUSINESS AS DUKE CARTAGE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 283. Argued November 21, 1924. Decided January 12, 19
Ozark Pipe Line Corp. v. Monier
OZARK PIPE LINE CORPORATION v. MONIER ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI No. 181. Argued November 26, 1924.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.