Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chang Chan v. Nagle
CHANG CHAN, WONG HUNG KAY, YEE SIN JUNG ET AL. v. NAGLE, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEARS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 770. Argued April 17, 20, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Chinese women, being
Cheung Sum Shee v. Nagle
CHEUNG SUM SHEE ET AL. v. NAGLE, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 769. Argued April 17, 20, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Alien Chinese wives and minor children, of Ch
Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Portland
REAL SILK HOSIERY MILLS v. CITY OF PORTLAND ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. • No. 417. Argued April 27, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. A municipal ordinance requiring that every person who goes from pl
Weller v. New York
WELLER v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE COURT OP SPECIAL SESSIONS OP THE CITY OP NEW YORK, STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 349. Argued April 28, 29, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. A state law forbidding and penalizing the engaging withou
Davis v. Pringle
DAVIS, FEDERAL AGENT FOR CLAIMS DUE IN OPERATION OF ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD, v. PRINGLE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF ESTATE OF BOYD CO., INC. DAVIS, FEDERAL AGENT FOR CLAIMS DUE IN OPERATION OF SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY, v. PRINGL
Fernandez v. Phillips
FERNANDEZ v. PHILLIPS, U. S. MARSHAL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 680. Argued May 4, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. In extradition proceedings, form is not to be insisted upon b
Coronado Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers
CORONADO COAL COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 671. Argued January 7, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Where the constitution of an “international” trade
North Carolina Railroad v. Story
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY v. STORY, SHERIFF OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 322, Argued April 14, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. A judgment of' a .state su
Davis v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.
No. 783. James C. Davis, Agent, etc., v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc., etc. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Argued May 4, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. Mr. Duncan K. Brent, with whom Messrs. Francis R. Cross and A. A
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 13. Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, Intervener. In Equity. Orders entered May 11, 1925.
North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman
NORTH LARAMIE LAND COMPANY v. HOFFMAN ET AL. ERiioR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE" STATE OF WYOMING. No. 323. Argued April 14, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. Upon review of a judgment of a state -court involving the constitutionality of a sta
Western Pacific Railroad v. United States
WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP- CLAIMS. No. 287. Argued November 19, 20, 1924. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. Where transportation bills at land-grant rates bore endorsements 'sufficiently notifying go
Southern Pacific Co. v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 285. Argued November 19, 20, 1924. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. Where a railroad, for transporting applicants for enlistment in ■ the Army, discharged, retired and
Cockrill v. California
COCKRILL ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT. OF APPEAL, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 182. Argued March 6, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. By the California Alien Land Law, under which acquisition, use or control
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Argued April 20, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. Description of a boundary in field notes and patent as “up the river ”, construed, in the light of
Lewellyn v. Frick
LEWELLYN, FORMER COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. FRICK ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN.DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.. No. 681. Argued April 16, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. Acts of Congress are to be
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wooldridge
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY v. WOOLDRIDGE, RECEIVER OF THE NATIONAL BANK OF CLEBURNE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEARS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 352. Argued April 29, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. -Where a guaranty comp
Southern Utilities Co. v. City of Palatka
SOUTHERN UTILITIES COMPANY v. CITY OF PALATKA. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 339. Argued April 27, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. An agreement of a public utility with a city to observe specified rates remains
Colorado v. Toll
THE STATE OF COLORADO v. TOLL, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. No. 234. Argued April 24, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. A proper remedy fo
United States v. Johnston
UNITED STATES v. JOHNSTON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. APPEARS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 111. Argued April 30, 1925. Decided, May 11, 1925. 1. Under the provision of the “ Revenue Act of 1918,” taxing admission fees, (Feb. 24, 191
Byars v. United States
No. 1086. A. J. Byars v. The United States. May 4, 1925. Mr. Claude R. Porter for petitioner. The Attorney General for the United States.
Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Massachusetts
ALPHA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF. THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 103 and 327. Argued October 23, 1924. Decided May 4, 1925. 1. A State may not impose upon a foreign cor
Shafer v. Farmers Grain Co.
SHAFER, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, ET AL. v. FARMERS GRAIN COMPANY OF EMBDEN, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NORTH DAKOTA. No. 34. Argued May 4, 1923. Reargued March 2,
Crew Levick Co. v. City of Philadelphia ex rel. McHugh
No. 154. Crew Levick Company v. The City of Philadelphia, to the use of J. Joseph McHugh. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. Argued April 20, 1925. Decided April 27, 1925.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.