Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pierce v. Society of Sisters
PIERCE, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, ET AL. v. SOCIETY OF SISTERS. PIERCE, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, ET AL. v. HILL MILITARY ACADEMY. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP OREGON. Nos. 583, 584. Argued March 16, 17, 1925
Miles v. Graham
MILES, FORMER COLLECTOR, v. GRAHAM. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 53. Argued March 16, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. Under Art. Ill, § 1, of the Constitution it is the duty of Congress d
Frick v. Pennsylvania
FRICK ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 122, 123, 124, 125. Argued. December 7, 1923. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. A state statute /attempting to tax the transfer of tangible personal property having an ac
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Order entered June 1, 1925 approving the final report of the receiver herein and terminating the receivership.
Cami v. Central Victoria, Ltd.
CAMI, COMMISSIONER v. CENTRAL VICTORIA, LTD. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF .APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 370. Submitted April 30, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. Certiorari will not- ordinarily be .granted to review- decisions .of
Selzman v. United States
SELZMAN v. UNITED STATES. error to the united states district court for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. No. 998. Submitted April 27, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. Under the Eighteenth Amendment Congress has power to prevent or regulate the
Edwards v. Chile Copper Co.
No. 1098. William H. Edwards, Collector of Internal Revenue, Second New York District, v. Chile Copper Company. May 25, 1925. The Solicitor General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for the petitioner. Mess
Coffee v. Gray
No. 593. G. W. Coffee et al. v. Joseph F. Gray, Receiver of the Tallulah Falls Railway Co. et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 20, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. Messrs. S. R.
Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. Martin
EDWARD HINES YELLOW PINE TRUSTEES v. ANNA F. C. MARTIN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 363. Argued May 1, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Where a construction of a state statute affecting title to
Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank
SOWELL v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS, TEXAS. ERROR to the circuit court of appeals for the FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 367. Argued May 1, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. An action' brought on a promissory note by a federal reserve bank, a federal
Knewel v. Egan
KNEWEL, SHERIFF v. EGAN. APPEAL, FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR- THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. - No. 622. Argued April 20, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. A sentence of a state court in a criminal case can not be reviewed b
Dumbra v. United States
DOMENICO DUMBRA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 546. Argued April 20, 21, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. A prohibition agent, appointed by the Commissioner
Meek v. Centre County Banking Co.
MEEK v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING CO. ET AL. DALE v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING CO. ET AL. BREEZE v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING CO. ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Nos. 191, 192, 193. Argued March 13, 1924; reargu
Banton v. Belt Line Railway Corp.
BANTON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, v. BELT LINE RAILWAY CORP. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 465. Argued March 11, 12, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Where an order of the New York Pub
Toyota v. United States
TOYOTA v. UNITED STATES ON CERTIFICATE FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 231. Argued March 18, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. A person, of the Japanese race, born in Japan, may not legally be naturalized under the sev
Realty Holding Co. v. Donaldson
REALTY HOLDING COMPANY v. DONALDSON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 348. Argued April 28, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. An allegation that a defendant in' the District Court is
United States v. Royer
UNITED STATES v. ROYER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 359. Argued April 30, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. To constitute an officer de jacto, it is not essential that there shall have been an attempted exercise of competent or prima
United States ex rel. Rutz v. Levy
UNITED STATES EX REL. RUTZ v. LEVY, U. S. MARSHAL. UNITED STATES EX REL. FAUNTLEROY v. LEVY, U. S. MARSHAL. UNITED STATES EX REL. STENECK v. LEVY, U. S. MARSHAL. UNITED STATES EX REL. WANNER v. LEVY, U. S. MARSHAL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT
United States v. Baltimore Post
UNITED STATES v. BALTIMORE POST. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 847. Argued April 16, 17, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. Decided upon the authority of United States v. Dickey, ante, p. 378. 2
United States v. Dickey
UNITED STATES v. DICKEY ET AL. ERROR TO THE. DISTRICT COURT. OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 768. Argued April 16, 17, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Assuming that no constitutional right of the tax-payer is i
Ray Consolidated Copper Co. v. United States
RAY CONSOLIDATED COPPER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 443. Argued January 13, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. The -term “ capital stock ” has no fixed meaning in taxing statutes, and must be interpreted in ea
Sherwin v. United States
CHARLES SHERWIN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 379. Argued April 16, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. Section 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act grants immunity from prosecution
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Reynolds-Davis Grocery Co.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. REYNOLDS-DAVIS GROCERY CO. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS. No. 329. Submitted April 21, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. Where the final carrier named in the bill of lading on a through interstate sh
Benedict v. Ratner
WALLACE BENEDICT, RECEIVER, v. RATNER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 11. Argued October 5, 1923. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. By the law of New 'York a transfer of property, as security fora debt, which
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.