Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Mitchell
UNITED STATES v. MITCHELL et al., EXECUTORS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 470. Argued March 18, 19, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. In calculating the income tax on an estate during' administration, * under the Revenue Act of 1918,
Keith v. Johnson
KEITH, FORMER COLLECTOR, v. JOHNSON, ADMINISTRATRIX. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 295. Argued January 6, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The New York transfer tax (Cons. Ls. c. 60, Art. X) is prima
Huff v. Page
No. 468. R. E. Huff v. Irving Page, Receiver of the First National Bank of Lawton, Oklahoma. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. April 12, 1926. Messrs. B. H. Shear, E. E. Blake, and F. W. Fischer for defendant in e
Gratz v. McKee
No. 1036. Benjamin Gratz v. James S. McKee, Nellie Canon Bliven, Executrix of William E. Bliven, Deceased, et al. April 12, 1926. Mr. S. Mayner Wallace for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Loma Fruit Co.
No. 1007. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Loma Fruit Company and G. Warren and Company, Ltd. April 12, 1926. Messrs. A. S. H. Bristow and William Mann for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Madjorus v. Ohio
No. 1001. Peter Madjorus v. State of Ohio. April 12, 1926. Mr. Jonathan Taylor for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Henry v. Irwin
No. 158. Randolph Henry, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Free Service Pharmacy, Inc., Bankrupt, v. W. A. Irwin and Thomas E. Payne. Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Submitted March 22, 1926. Decided Apr
Barr v. McCorkle
No. 1060. Charles Barr v. A. A. McCorkle, Warden and Keeper of the Tennessee State Penitentiary. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. Motion to transfer cause submitted March 22, 1926. De
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Schendel
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SCHENDEL, ADMINISTRATOR. THE SAME v. ELDER. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. Nos. 683, 684. Argued March 17, 18, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The effect of a ju
Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange
MOORE, PRESIDENT OF THE ODD-LOT COTTON EXCHANGE OF NEW YORK, v. NEW YORK COTTON EXCHANGE et al. APPEAL PROM THE. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 200. Argued March 9, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Relief, under the Tr
Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
SMITH et al. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. THE SAME v. THE SAME. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ' ‘SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 193, 670. Argued March 5, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. An order granting
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.
MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY et al. v. PEORIA & PEKIN UNION RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 767. Argued March 17, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. An order of
Tutun v. United States
TUTUN v. UNITED STATES. NEUBERGER v. UNITED STATES. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND CIRCUITS. Nos. 762, 824. Argued March 3, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. An order of .the District Court grantin
Mellon v. Weiss
MELLON, AGENT, etc. v. WEISS, ADMINISTRATOR, etc. CERTIORARI TO THE MUNICIPAL COURT OP THE CITY OP BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. No. 223. Argued March 19, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Substitution of the federal Agent as defendant in a suit er
Harrigan v. Bergdoll
HARRIGAN, TRUSTEE, etc. v. BERGDOLL, ALSO KNOWN AS BERGSON. CERTIORARI, TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 181. Argued November 23, 24, 1925. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The state statute of limitations prescribing the ti
Childers v. Beaver
CHILDERS, STATE AUDITOR, v. BEAVER et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT''OF OKLAHOMA. No. 202. Argued March 9, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Transfer by descent from one tribal-Indian-to another of
Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA et al. THE SAME v. THE SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 70, 71. Argued October 21, 22, 1925. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The transpor
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Reed
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. REED et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 57. Submitted October 15, 1925. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The term “ settlement ” is used in the Homestead Law as comprehending a
Liberato v. Royer
LIBERATO et al. v. ROYER et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 214. Argued March 15, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. That part of-the elective Workmen’s Compensation Act of .Pennsylvania which denies compensation
United States v. National Exchange Bank
UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK OF BALTIMORE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 222. Argued March 16, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. A drawee of a check or draft who is also the drawer is held, in p
United States v. Michigan Portland Cement Co.
UNITED STATES v. MICHIGAN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 217. Argued March 16, 17, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. A shipper may be guilty of the offense of obta
United States v. P. Koenig Coal Co.
UNITED STATES v. P. KOENIG COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 216. Argued March 16, 17, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Under § 1 of the Elkins Act, making it a misdemeanor for
Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.
LUCKETT v. DELPARK, INC., et al APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 220. Argued March 16, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1: A suit is within the jurisdiction of the District Court, as arising unde
Cherokee Nation v. United States
CHEROKEE NATION v. UNITED STATES APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 198. Argued March 8, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The effect as res judicata of the judgment of the Court of Claims, as modified by this Court'(202 U. S. 101), determ
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.