Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Colorado v. United States
COLORADO v. UNITED STATES et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRTCT OF COLORADO. No. 195. Argued March 5, 8, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. 1. Under § 1, pars. 18-20, of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended by Tran
United States ex rel. Hughes v. Gault
UNITED STATES ex rel. HUGHES v. GAULT, MARSHAL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 513. Argued April 22, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. 1. The Constitution does not require any preliminary hearin
Early & Daniel Co. v. United States
EARLY & DANIEL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 299. Argued April 30, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. When a contractor, upon demand of the Government, delivers under protest goods in an amount exceeding that which
Iselin v. United States
ISELIN et al. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 291. Argued April 29, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. 1. Offer by letter to buy airplane linen from the Government on terms specified, including a warranty of quality, held not
Super v. Work
No. 262. Steve Super and Benjamin H. Wilder v. Hubert Work, Secretary of the Interior, as a member of the Federal Power Commission, and William M. Jardine, Secretary of Agriculture, etc. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of C
Patterson v. Mobile Gas Co.
PATTERSON et al. v. MOBILE GAS COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OP ALABAMA. No. 226. Argued March 19, 1926. Decided April 26, 1926. 1. Failure to make up a record in accordance with the rule is c
Venner v. Michigan Central Railroad
VENNER v. MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 190. Argued January 28, 1926. Decided April 26, 1926. 1. A suit against a railroad by a minority stockholder to
New York Central Railroad v. New York & Pennsylvania Co.
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al. v. NEW YORK AND PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 230. Argued April 13, 14, 1926. Decided April 26, 1926. 1. The provision of the Transportation
Union Insulating & Construction Co. v. United States
UNION INSULATING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 263. Submitted April 21, 1926. Decided April 26, 1926. 1. Stipulations'by the United States, in a construction contract, to furnish a right of wa
Seligman v. Bowers
No. 674. Israel Seligman v. Frank K. Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second District of New York, and David H. Blair, United States Commissioner, etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Distri
Lynch v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.
No. 310. Carter Lynch, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Tennessee River Coal Company, v. Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway Company et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. Motion to dismiss submitted April 12, 192
New York Life Insurance v. Edwards
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. EDWARDS, COLLECTOR. EDWARDS, COLLECTOR, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 712, 804. Argued March 2, 3, 1926. Decided April 19, 1926
Boyd v. United States
BOYD v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 365. Argued December 1, 1925. Decided April 19, 1926. 1. The mere fact that the quantity of morphine dispensed by a registered physician by a pres
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Galbreath Cattle Co.
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GALBREATH CATTLE COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 138. Argued January 15, 1926. Decided April 19, 1926. 1. Where a petition for removal is.based on diverse citizens
Sun Ship Building Co. v. United States
SUN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. KENILWORTH COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. DORRIS MOTOR CAR COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS Ff£OM fHE COURT-OF CLAIMS. Nos. 237, 240, 241. Argued April 15, 16, 1926. Decided April 19, 1926. Judgments
Massachusetts v. New York
MASSACHUSETTS v. NEW YORK et al. IN EQUITY. No. 14, Original. Argued March 4, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Property and dominion over lands in America discovered under royal authority vested in the Crown to be held as part of the public
Reading Co. v. Koons
READING COMPANY v. KOONS, ADMINISTRATOR. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 213. Argued March 12, 15, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. Section 6 .of the Employers’ Liability Act, providing “ That no action shall
Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
ROBERTS & SCHAEFER COMPANY v. EMMERSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 210. Argued March 12, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Quaere: Whether, as between its domestic corporations, a
Hartville Oil Mill v. United States
HARTSVILLE OIL MILL v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 609. Argued March 3, 4, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. Jurisdiction of the Court of Claims to hear and decide a claim, existing under Jud. Code, § 145, was not aff
Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North
MISSOURI ex rel. HURWITZ v. NORTH et al. EEEOE TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. ' No. 209. Submitted March 12, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. A state statute which authorizes a board of'health to revoke the ■ license of a ph
Engel v. Davenport
ENGEL v. DAVENPORT et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 189. Submitted January 26, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. . 1. A complaint by a seaman against a ship owner for damages for injuries alleged to have re
Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS et al. v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 567. Argued January 18, 19, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. 1. The just compensation
Evansville & Bowling Green Packet Co. v. Chero Cola Bottling Co.
EVANSVILLE AND BOWLING GREEN PACKET COMPANY v. CHERO COLA BOTTLING COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ■ ■ DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 127. Argued January 13, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. A wharfboat, in a rive
Mottram v. United States
MOTTRAM v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 142. Argued January 15, 1926. Decided April 12, 1926. Where a lot of goods, among surplus military supplies auctioned by ' the United States, was grossly overstated as to quanti
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.