Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sutherland v. Mayer
SUTHERLAND, ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, v. MAYER et al. MAYER v. SUTHERLAND, ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, et al. REIS et al. v. MAYER et al. APPEALS FROM .THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. Nos. 232, 233, 234. Argued April 14,
Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. United States
WESTERN PAPER MAKERS’ CHEMICAL COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 312. Argued May 4, 5, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. The determination by the Inter
United States v. Wyckoff Pipe & Creosoting Co.
UNITED STATES v. WYCKOFF PIPE & CREOSOTING COMPANY, INC. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 282. Argued April 29, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. Where a contractor with the Government completed the job under the contract, reserving the ri
Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
TURNER, DENNIS & LOWRY LUMBER COMPANY v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 271. Argued April 26, 27, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. A suit by a
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Alvin R. Durham Co.
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. ALVIN R. DURHAM COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP MICHIGAN. No. 257. Argued April 20, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. The Uniform Bill of Lading Act of August 29, 1916, c. 415, § 23,
Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Jackson & Eastern Railway Co.
ALABAMA & VICKSBURG RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. JACKSON & EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 244. Argued April 16, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. Judgment of a state court held reviewable' by writ'of error
Fenner v. Boykin
FENNER et al. v. BOYKIN et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE • ' NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 308. Argued May 4, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. Enforcement of a state penal statute, even of one contrary to the feder
Mellon v. Michigan Trust Co.
MELLON, DIRECTOR GENERAL, v. MICHIGAN TRUST COMPANY, RECEIVER. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO. THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 272. Argued April 27, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. In view of § 10 of the.Federal Contro
Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. Arma Engineering Co.
SPERRY GYROSCOPE COMPANY v. ARMA ENGINEERING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 'STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ‘ EASTERN DISTRICT OF-NEW YORK. No. 239. Argued April 15, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. In a suit in the District Court against a priv
General Investment Co. v. New York Central Railroad
GENERAL INVESTMENT COMPANY v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 274. Argued April 27, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. A bill by a minority • stockholder aga
Virginian Railway Co. v. Mullens
VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. MULLENS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WYOMING COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. No. 163. Argued January 21, 22,1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1, A railroad company is not liable for floodings of private land resulting f
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Nixon
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. NIXON, ADMINISTRATRIX. certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of the STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 306. Argued May 3, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. A railroad section foreman, one of whose duties was to go
United States v. Minnesota Mutual Investment Co.
UNITED STATES v. MINNESOTA MUTUAL INVESTMENT COMPANY. ERROR. TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 348. Submitted May 6, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. Collection of interest by the United States from a national
Booth Fisheries Co. v. Industrial Commission
BOOTH FISHERIES COMPANY et al. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. No. 313. Argued May 5, 1926. Decided May 24, 1926. 1. The Wisconsin Workmen’s Compensation Act, (Ls. 1921, §§
C. A. P. Turner Co. v. United States
No. 302. C. A. P. Turner Company v. United States. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Argued May 3, 1926. Decided May 10, 1926. Mr. Benton Baker, for appellant. Solicitor General Mitchell and Mr. A. C. Paul for the United States.
Scott v. Morris National Bank
No. 455. James Scott v. Morris National Bank, of Morris. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 3, 1926. Decided May 10, 1926. Messrs. Charles A. Dixon and E. J. McVann for defendant i
Leiter v. United States
LEITER et al., TRUSTEES, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 251. Argued April 19, 1926. Decided May 10, 1926. 1. A lease to the Government for a term of years, made without specific authority of law, under an appropriati
United States v. Noveck
UNITED STATES v. NOVECK. ERROR to the united states district court for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 169. Argued January 25, 1926. Decided May 10, 1926. 1. That part of Rev. .Stats. § 1044, as amended November 17, 1921, • which pro
Hassler, Inc. v. Shaw
HASSLER, INC. v. SHAW. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF SOUTH .CAROLINA, No. 278. Argued April 27, 1926. Decided May 10, 1926. 1. A petition to remove from state to federal court is not a general appeara
Hutchinson v. Sperry
No. 281. Shelley B. Hutchinson v. William M. Sperry and Emily Sperry, his wife, Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. of New York, et al., etc., et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Argued April 28,. 1926. Decided May
Ex parte Ehrlich
No. —, original. Ex parte William G. Ehrlich. May 3, 1926. Messrs. William C. Prentiss and Joseph E. Morrison for petitioner.
Harrison v. Chamberlin
HARRISON, TRUSTEE, v. CHAMBERLIN. certiorari to the circuit court op appeals por the EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 168. Argued January 22, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. 1. A proceeding instituted by a trustee in bankruptcy, in the bankruptcy suit, to re
Taylor v. Voss
TAYLOR, TRUSTEE, et al. v. VOSS, TRUSTEE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 199. Argued March 8, 9, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. 1. The “ controversies arising in bankruptcy proceedings ”• referred to in
Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.
BOWERS, COLLECTOR, v. KERBAUGH-EMPIRE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 173. Argued January 25, 1926. Decided May 3, 1926. Plaintiff borrowed money from a bank in Germany before th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.