Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Hyde
No. 601. Aetna Insurance Company et al. v. Ben C. Hyde, Superintendent, etc. November 1, 1926. Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, Robert J. Folonie, William S. Hogsett, Ashley Cockrill, and John S. Leahy fqr petitioners. Messrs. North T. Gentry and
Uihlein v. Wisconsin
No. 175. Herman A. Uihlein, August E. Uihlein, George Uihlein et al. v. State of Wisconsin, Neele B. Neelen, Public Administrator of Milwaukee County, et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin. Submitted October 27, 1926.
Moore v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
MOORE, COMMISSIONER, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 185. Argued October 12, 1926. Decided November 1, 1926. 1. Under Jud. Code § 238; as amended by Act of Fe
Hebert v. Louisiana
HEBERT et al. v. LOUISIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 24. Submitted October 13, 1926. Decided November 1, 1926. 1. The Eighteenth Amendment contemplates that the manufacture of intoxicating liquor for beverag
Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.
No. 494. Federal Trade Commission v. Procter and Gamble Company et al. October 25, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell and Mr. Bayard T. Hainer for petitioner. Mr. Frank F. Dinsmore for respondents.
Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. de Coster
No. 550. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Company, Limited, Inc. v. Gabriela Andrea de Coster. October 25, 1926. Messrs. F. G. Fisher and C. A. DeWitt for petitioner. Messrs. Chester Í. Long, George E. Chamberlain, Peter Q. Nyce, and An
Waxman v. United States
No. 536. Charles Waxman v. United States. October 25, 1926. Mr. Charles Waxman, pro se. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. Mahlon D. Kiefer for the United States. ■
Roberts v. Yegen
No. 523. Hilda Roberts et al. v. Chris Yegen et al. October 25, 1926. Mr. H. Lowndes Maury for petitioners. Mr. George Hurd for respondents..
Horton v. Hardee
No. 516. Ralph A. Horton v. Cary A. Hardee, Governor, et al. October 25, 1926. Messrs. Scott M. Lojtin, James E. Calkins, arid Jno. P. Stokes for petitioner. Messrs. Francis P. Fleming and Marvin C. McIntosh for respondents.
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. King
No. 552. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company of Texas v. J. H. King. October 25, 1926. Messrs. Alexander H. McKnight, Joseph M. Bryson, and Charles C. Huff for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States
No. 540. Richmond Screw Anchor Company, Inc. v. United States. October 25, 1926. Messrs. Joseph W. Cox, Archibald- Cox, 0. Ellery Edwards, and William H. Kenyon for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell and Assistant Attorney General Gallo
Nelson v. California
No. 143. Sam Nelson v. State of California. Error to the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District of the State of California. Submitted October 18, 1926. Decided October 25, 1926. Messrs. Samuel Herrick and J. L. O’Connor for pla
Dorchy v. Kansas
DORCHY v. KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 119. Argued October 7, 1926. Decided October 25, 1926. 1. A decision by a state supreme court as to the separability of parts of a state statute from other parts found
Palmetto Fire Insurance v. Conn.
PALMETTO FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CONN. CHRYSLER SALES CORPORATION v. SPENCER, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER. UTTERBACK-GLEASON COMPANY v. SPENCER, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER. CLARK MOTOR COMPANY v. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. CHRYSLER SALES
Myers v. United States
MYERS, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 2. Argued December 5, 1923; reargued April 13, 14, 1925. Decided October 25, 1926. 1. A postmaster who was removed from office petitioned the President and the Se
Ottinger v. Bronx Gas & Electric Co.
No. 695. Albert Ottinger, as Attorney General of the State of New York v. Bronx Gas and Electric Company. October 18, 1926. No appearance for appellant.
Submarine Signal Co. v. United States
No. 510. Submarine Signal Company v. United States. October 18, 1926. Messrs. Philip B. Buzzell, Andrew B. Duvall, and Elmer T. Bell for the petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell and Assistant Attorney General Galloway for the United State
New York Life Insurance Co. v. United States
No. 502. New York Life Insurance Company v. United States. October 18, 1926. Mr. James H. McIntosh for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Howard T. Jones, A. W. Gregg, and Edward H. H
Universal Rim Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
No. 491. Universal Rim Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company et al. October 18, 1926. Messrs. Rudolph W. Lotz and Arthur W. Nelson for petitioner. Messrs. A. L. Ely and F. 0. Richey for respondents.
Illinois Central Railroad v. United States
No. 485. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. United States. October 18, 1926. Messrs. Lawrence H. Cake and F. W. Clements for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, ,and Mr. Louis R. Mehlenger for the
Barnett v. United States
No. 479. Warren E. Barnett v. United States. October 18, 1926. Messrs. Joseph C. Breitenstein, William L. Day, and Luther Day for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willébrandt, and Mr. Mahlon D. 'Kiefer for
Converse v. United States
No. 474. Howard P. Converse and Edwin P. Bliss, Trading as Converse and Company v. United States. October 18, 1926. Mr. George R. Shields for peti- tioners Solicitor General - Mitchell and Assistant Attorney General Galloway for-the United
Oregon & California Railroad v. Hammond
No. 468. Oregon and California Railroad Company v. Andrew B. Hammond and Charles J. Winton. October 18, 1926. Messrs. Ben C. Dey and Alfred A. Hampson for petitioner. Messrs. Charles' H. Carey and James B. Kerr for respondents.
Albury v. United States
No. 461. H. M. Albury v. United States. October 18, 1926. Mr. Bart A. Riley for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. K. L. Campbell for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.