Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. CHEMICAL FOUNDATION, INC. 'APPEAL from the circuit court of appeals for the THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 127. Argued December 9, 10, 11, 1925. Decided October 11, 1926. 1. A decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals, entered prior to th
McGuire v. Railroad Labor Board
No. 99. J. McGuire v. Railroad Labor Board. October 4, 1926. Mr. Donald R. Richberg for appellant.
Johnson v. Georgia
No. 156. No. 157. Wade Johnson v. State of Georgia; and Jarrett Benford v. State of Georgia. October 4, 1926. Messrs. G. Y. Harrell, W. A. McClennan, and William Q. Cooper for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. George M. Napier and T. R. Gress fo
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Oklahoma
No. 345. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. State of Oklahoma et al.
Ex parte City of New York, Transit Commission
No. —, original. Ex parte in the matter of City of New York, Transit Commission, and John F. Gilchrist et al., etc.
Tendler v. Tendler
No. 522. Kate Tendler v. Morris Tendler.
New Mexico v. Texas
No. 3, Original. State of New Mexico v. State of Texas. Order entered June 7, 1926.
Lapique v. District Court
No. —, original. John Lapique v. District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California. June 7, 1926. Mr. John Lapique, pro se.
Massachusetts v. New York
MASSACHUSETTS v. NEW YORK et al. IN EQUITY. No. 14, Original. Decree entered June 7, 1926. Final decree defining the rights of the States of New York and Massachusetts respecting the land in controversy, and dismissing the bill, with provis
Scott v. Paisley
SCOTT v. PAISLEY et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 253. Argued April 19, 20, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. Under § 6037 of the Georgia Code, 1910, the holder of a debt and of the legal title- of land conveyed t
Arkansas v. Tennessee
ARKANSAS v. TENNESSEE. No. 2, Original. Decree entered June 7, 1926. Final decree, overruling exceptions of the State of Tennessee to the report of the boundary commission herein; accepting that report and establishing and declaring the' bo
Hammer v. United States
HAMMER v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 317. Argued May 5, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. False testimony before a referee in bankruptcy may constitute the offense of perjury under § 1
Jaybird Mining Co. v. Weir
JAYBIRD MINING COMPANY v. WEIR, COUNTY TREASURER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 293. Argued April 29, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. Where mining land owned by incompetent Quapaw Indians under a patent subject to
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United States
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 280. Argued April 28, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. The Act of July 28, 1916, authorized the Interstate Commerce Commission to determine on a space ba
Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Commission
FROST & FROST TRUCKING CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 828. Argued April 21, 22, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. Assuming, that the use of its highways by private carriers
Lake Superior Consolidated Iron Mines v. Lord
LAKE SUPERIOR CONSOLIDATED IRON MINES et. al v. LORD et al. BURROWS et al. v. LORD et al. ROYAL MINERAL ASSOCIATION et al. v. LORD et al. BOEING et al. v. LORD et al. WHITESIDE et al. v. LORD et al. MERRIMAC MINING COMPANY v. LORD et al. BA
Berizzi Bros. v. Steamship Pesaro
BERIZZI BROTHERS COMPANY v. STEAMSHIP PESARO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE -SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.' No. 334. Argued May 7, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. A ship owned and possessed by a friendly foreign governme
Panama Railroad v. Vasquez
PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY v. VASQUEZ, ADMINISTRATOR, etc. CERTIORARI TO THE SÚFREME COURT . OE THE STATE OE NEW YORK. No. 260. Argued January 13, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. The clause in Jud. Code, §§ 24, 256, relating to causes arising u
Morse Drydock & Repair Co. v. Steamship Northern Star
MORSE DRYDOCK & REPAIR COMPANY v. STEAMSHIP NORTHERN STAR, etc., et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT: No. 326. Argued May 6, 7, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. Subsection It of § 30 of the Ship Mortgage A
Goltra v. Weeks
GOLTRA v. WEEKS, SECRETARY OF WAR, et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 718. Argued April 27, 28, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. A suit by one who had obtained lawful possession of a fleet of boats b
Alejandrino v. Quezon
ALEJANDRINO v. QUEZON et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 309. Submitted May 4, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. The Jurisdictional Act of September 6, 1916, repealed the provision of the Philippine Autonomy
Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad
YU CONG ENG et al. v. TRINIDAD, COLLECTOR, et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 623. Argued April 12, 13, 1926. Decided June 7, 1926. 1. The Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands has discretionary jurisdic
Raffel v. United States
RAFFEL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF - APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 307. Submitted May 4, 1926, Decided June 1, 1926. 1. A defendant in a criminal case who voluntarily testifies in his own behalf, waives comp
City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank
CITY OF DOUGLAS v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 279. Argued April 28, 1926. Decided June 1, 1926. 1. When paper is indorsed without restriction by a depositor, and is at on
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.