Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.
UNITED STATES v. CARLO BIANCHI & CO., INC. No. 529. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. 157 Ct. Cl., judgment vacated and cause remanded. David L. Rose argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor Ge
Local No. 207, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. Perko
LOCAL NO. 207, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL AND ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKERS UNION, et al. v. PERKO. No. 482. Argued April 23-24, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the br
Local 100, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices v. Borden
LOCAL 100, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN & APPRENTICES, v. BORDEN. No. 541. Argued April 24, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. L. N. D. Wells, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. 'With him on the briefs was Charles J. Morris. Robert Weldon Sm
Goss v. Board of Education
GOSS et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE, et al. No. 217. Argued March 20-21, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit
McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 Cahokia
McNEESE et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 187 CAHOKIA, ILLINOIS, et al. No. 480. Argued April 23, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. Raymond E. Harth argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the. brief were John
Wheeldin v. Wheeler
WHEELDIN et al. v. WHEELER. No. 493. Argued April 23, 1963. Decided June 3, 1963. A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioners. With him .on the briefs were Fred Okrand arid Nanette Dembitz. . Alan S. Rosenthal argued the cause for responde
Arizona v. California
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA et al. No. 8, Original. Argued January 8-11, 1962.—Restored to calendar for reargument June 4, 1962.—Reargued November 13-14, 1962. Decided June 3, 1963. Mark Wilmer reargued the cause for complainant. With him on the
International Ass'n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.
No. 61. No. 720. No. 854. No. 858. No. 859. No. 1100, No. 853, No. 983, Misc. Misc. Misc. International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Central Airlines, Inc., Rees v. Virginia, Fuqua v. Mississippi, Yacimientos Petroliferos F
Gilmore v. New York
No. 1180, Misc. Gilmore v. New York.
Woods v. Illinois
No. 1147, Misc. Woods v. Illinois.
Burks v. Illinois
No. 1103, Misc. Burks v. Illinois.
Balthazar v. Heinze
No. 1088, Misc. Balthazar v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
Miller v. Gladden
No. 1053, Misc. Miller v. Gladden, Warden.
Christian v. Beto
No. 1021, Misc. Christian v. Beto, Corrections Director.
Williams v. United States
No. 981, Misc. Williams v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Rakes v. United States
No. 918, Misc. Rakes v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Lawrenson v. United States
No. 833, Misc. Lawrenson v. United States et al. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States et al.
Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc.
No. 999. Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc., et al. Petitioner pro se. Donald Marks, Benjamin C. Milner III and Harold L. Smith for respondents.
Jefferson City Cabinet Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
No. 1003. Jefferson City Cabinet Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. H. R. Silvers and G. Maynard Smith for petitioner. Benjamin C. Sigal and David S. Davidson for respondents.
Willard Dairy Corp. v. National Dairy Products Corp.
No. 824. Willard Dairy Corp. v. National Dairy Products Corp. Kenneth Thornton for petitioner. Richard F. Stevens for respondent.
Hollman v. Arkansas
No. 867. Hollman v. Arkansas. Jack H.olt, Sr. for petitioner. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Jack L. Lessenberry, Assistant Attorney General, fór respondent.
Keeler v. United States
No. 742. Keeler et ux. v. United States. DeWitt Williams for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Ober-dorfer and Joseph Kovner for the United States.
National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.
No. 537. National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co. Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner.
Weller v. California
No. 1065, No. 1117, No. 1154, No. 1169, No. 1188, No. 1248, No. 1277, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Weller v. California et al.; Adams v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent; Ex parte Schlette; Hanovich v. Maxwell, Warden, et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.