Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
May 27, 1963. No. 45. No. 49. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc., et al. v. Paul, Director of the Department of Agriculture of California, et al.; and Paul, Director of the Department of Agriculture of California, et al. v. Florida Lime &
Alabama v. United States
ALABAMA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 15, Original. Decided May 27, 1963. J. Kirkman Jackson, John P. Kohn, George Stephen Leonard, Richard L. Hirshberg, John W. Vardaman, John A. Caddell and 77ms. B. Hill, Jr. for plaintiffs. Solicito
Smith v. Kansas
SMITH v. KANSAS et al. No. 966, Misc. Decided May 27, 1963. Appellant pro se. William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Park McGee, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Buffington v. Wainwright
BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 706, Misc. Decided May 27, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Gonzalez v. City of Chicago
GONZALEZ et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO. No. 984. Decided May 27, 1963. Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants. John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. f
Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA. No. 973. Decided May 27, 1963. Harry Shapiro for appellants. Robert B. Cochran for appellée.
Hathaway v. Texas
HATHAWAY v. TEXAS. No. 532. Decided May 27, 1963. David B. Buerger for appellant. Norman V. Suarez, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, for appellee.
Watson v. City of Memphis
WATSON et al. v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al. No. 424. Argued April 17-18, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Derrick A. Bell, Jr. and H. T. Lockard. • T
Haynes v. Washington
HAYNES v. WASHINGTON. No. 147. Argued February 26-27, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Lawrence Speiser argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Francis Hoague and William W: Ross. George A. Kain • argued the cause for respon
Campbell v. United States
CAMPBELL et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 631. Argued April 25, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Melvin S. Louison and Lawrence F. O’Donnell argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Leonard Louison. Solicitor General Cox argued th
Boesche v. Udall
BOESCHE, ADMINISTRATOR, v. UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. No. 332. Argued February 25, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Leon BenEzra arguéd the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Lewis E. Hoffman. Solicitor General Cox argued th
Lopez v. United States
LOPEZ v. UNITED STATES. No. 236. Argued January 14, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Edward J. Davis argued the cause for petitioner.. With him on the brief was Gerald F. Muldoon. Louis F. Claiborne argued the cause for the United States. With h
Norvell v. Illinois
NORVELL v. ILLINOIS. No. 513. Argued April 24, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Thomas P. Sullivan argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With
Reed v. The Yaka
REED v. THE YAKA et al. No. 509. Argued April 22, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Abraham E. Freedman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. T. E. Byrne, Jr. argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for Pan-Atlantic S
United States v. Braverman
UNITED STATES v. BRAVERMAN. No. 506. Argued April 22, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Frank I. Goodman argued the cause for the United States by special leave of Court pro hoc vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant At
Sperry v. Florida ex rel. Florida Bar
SPERRY v. FLORIDA ex rel. FLORIDA BAR. No. 322. Argued March 25, 1963. Decided May 27, 1963. Carlisle M. Moore argued the cause for petitioner. With him-on the briefs were Oscar A. Mellin, LeRoy Hanscom, and Jack E. Hursh. F. Trowbridge vom
Stephens v. LaBurt
No. 1082, Misc. Stephens v. LaBurt, State Hospital Director. Morton Birnbaum for petitioner. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respond
Beauchamp v. California
No. 988, Misc. Beauchamp v. California et al.
Tranowski v. Pate
No. 959, Misc. Tranowski v. Pate, Warden.
Kessler v. United States
No. 671, Misc. Kessler v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.
Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. American Export Lines, Inc.
No. 997. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., v. American Export Lines, Inc. William B. Eley for petitioner. John W. Winston for respondent.
Mittelman v. United States
No. 974. Mittelman v. United States. O. John Rogge for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.
Sing v. Wainwright
No. 967. Sing et al. v. Wainwright, Corrections Director. A. K. Black for petitioners.
United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.
No. 942. United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States. Clarence G. Ashby for appellee.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.