Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Randolph v. Scruggs
RANDOLPH v. SCRUGGS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 272. Argued April 23, 24, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. 1. A claim for professional services rendered to a bankrupt in the preparation of a general
Colombia v. Cauca Co.
COLOMBIA v. CAUCA COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 259. Argued April 23, 24, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. There is a distinction between foreign States and foreign citizens. Congress did not mean
Hardin v. Shedd
HARDIN v. SHEDD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 56. Argued January 12, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. "When the United States conveys land hounded qn a non-navigable lake it assumes the position, so far as such convey
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Missouri ex rel. Gottlieb
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. MISSOURI ex rel. GOTTLIEB. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 256. Argued April 21, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. 1. In estimating, for purposes of taxation, the value of the property o
Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works
CONLEY v. MATHIESON ALKALI WORKS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 238. Argued April 15, 16, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. Granting the existence of a cause of action, 'it is not every
Southern Railway Co. v. Allison
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. ALLISON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 232. Argued April 8, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. Although a statute of North Carolina provides that a foreign railroad company desiring to o
United States ex rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. Hitchcock
UNITED STATES ex rel. RIVERSIDE OIL COMPANY v. HITCHCOCK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 632. Argued March 17, 18, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. Congress has constituted the Land Department, under the supervisi
Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.
COSMOS EXPLORATION COMPANY v. GRAY EAGLE OIL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 217. Argued March 16, 17, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. The general administration of the Forest Reserve Act, and also t
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 214. Argued April 13, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. 1. When competition which controls rates prev
Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Phelps
MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASSOCIATION v. PHELPS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 263. Argued April 24, 27, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. Under the statutes of Kentucky service of a summons upon the insurance
Swan & Finch Co. v. United States
SWAN AND FINCH COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 258. Argued April 22, 23, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. The placing on hoard vessels in the United States and bound for foreign ports of lubricating oils manufactur
Wilkes County v. Coler
WILKES COUNTY v. COLER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 247. Argued April 17, 20, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. The North Carolina ordinance of March 8, 1868, has been declared by the Supreme Court of th
Montgomery v. Portland
MONTGOMERY v. PORTLAND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 47. Argued April 9, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. While section 12 of the act of Congress of September 19, 1890, forbade the construction'or extension of piers, wh
In re Watts
In re WATTS and SACHS, PETITIONERS. ORIGINAL. HABEAS CORPUS. AND CERTIORARI. Nos. 15, 16. Argued April 20, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. 1. The jurisdiction of the courts in bankruptcy in the administration of the affairs of insolveht persons
Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co. v. Seiler
No. 673. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Company, Petitioner, v. A. J. Seiler. May 4, 1903. Mr. William R. Bagley and Mr. Robert M. Bashford for petitioner. Mr. Charles M. Peck for respondent.
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Gano
No. 279. Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. David D. Gano et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. Submitted May 1, 1903. Decided May 4, 1903. Mr. Albert E. Clarke for plaintiff in error. No
Kean v. Calumet Canal & Improvement Co.
KEAN v. CALUMET CANAL AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 8. Argued January 9, 12, 1903. Decided May 4, 1903. The common law, as understood by this court, and the local'.law of Indiana as to the
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Watson
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. WATSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 223. Argued and submitted March 20, 1903. Decided May 4, 1903. In an action to recover value of cotton burned while stored on a pl
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Townsend
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. TOWNSEND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 160. Submitted January 30, 1903. Decided May 4, 1903. Where the United States grants a right of way by statute to a railroad company whi
Oregon & California Railroad v. United States
OREGON AND CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. No. 3. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued March 4, 1903. Decided May 4, 1903. While a railway grant does not attach to lands which, at the
James v. Bowman
JAMES v. BOWMAN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 213. Argued March 16, 1903. Decided May 4, 1903. Although section 5507, Rev. Stat., which provides for the punishment of individu
Chamberlain v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.
No. 284. Emerson Chamberlain, Appellant, v. Peoria, Decatur and Evansville Railway Company et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. April 27, 1903. Mr. Edward B. Whitney for appellant. Mr. J. M.
Lamson v. Hutchins
No. 669. S. Warren Lamson et al., Petitioners, v. Charles F. Hutchins, Executor, etc. April 27, 1903. Mr.. Wm. H. Barnum for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
Giles v. Harris
GILES v. HARRIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 493. Submitted February, 24, 1903. Decided April 27, 1903. A Circuit Court of the United States in Alabama has not jurisdiction of a
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.