Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Foster v. Pryor
FOSTER v. PRYOR. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 173. Argued and submitted February 25, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. When the difference is deep and radical between two domains in which the same kind* of prop
Sexton v. California
SEXTON v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 155. Argued and submitted January 28, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Under sec. 5328, Rev. Stat., and the provisions of the Criminal Code of California, the stat
Shurtleff v. United States
SHURTLEFF v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 76. Argued January 20, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where Congress creates an office and provides for the removal of the incumbent at any time for inefficiency, neglect of dut
Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. Dobney
FARMERS’ AND MERCHANTS’ INSURANCE COMPANY v. DOBNEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 189. Submitted March 9, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where the allowance of an attorney’s fee under the provisions of a state stat
Potter v. Hall
POTTER v. HALL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 168. Submitted February 24, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Smith v. Townsend, 148 U. S. 490; Payne v. Robinson, 169 U. S. 323, and Calhoun v. Violet, 173 U. ,S. 0
Glidden v. Harrington
GLIDDEN v. HARRINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 199. Argued March 12, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Although this court has never had occasion to determine exactly what the Fourteenth Amendment required
Rankin v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
RANKIN v. FIDELITY INSURANCE, TRUST AND SAFE DEPOSIT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 178. Argued February 26, 27, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. The following propositions may be considered as settled
Sena v. United States
SENA v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 40. Argued January 16, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. 1. Where the boundaries of a Spanish grant made in 1728, are defined with accuracy they will not be controlled by v
Winebrenner v. Forney
WINEBRENNER v. FORNEY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 409. Argued March 6, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where there is a seeming contradiction between two clauses in a proclamation opening lands for settleme
McClung v. Penny
McCLUNG v. PENNY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 384. Argued March 6, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. It must appear that this court has jurisdiction of the case before it can inquire whether the territorial court
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY v. L. BUCKI & SON LUMBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 220. Argued March 20, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where it has been declared by the highest court of a Sta
Bell v. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co.
BELL v. COMMONWEALTH TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 191. Submitted March 10, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. .Under section 828, Rev. Stat., and section 2 of the act of
Oregon & California Railroad v. United States
OREGON AND CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. No. 2. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 187. Argued March 4, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. On the authority of the preceding case, Held, that where a
Oregon & California Railroad v. United States
OREGON AND CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. No. 1. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 186. Argued March 4, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. In a suit brought under the act of Congress of March 3, 18
Japanese Immigrant Case
THE JAPANESE IMMIGRANT CASE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 171. Argued February 24, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. 1. As the existing treaty with Japan expressly excepts from its opera
Tennessee v. Condon
TENNESSEE v. CONDON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 209. Argued March 12, 13, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. It is the duty of this court to decide actual controversies by a judgment ■which can be carried into effec
Brill v. Peckham Motor Truck & Wheel Co.
BRILL v. PECKHAM MOTOR TRUCK AND WHEEL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 181. Argued March 2, 3, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Where in a patent ease a preliminary injunction has been granted by
Kirwan v. Murphy
KIRWAN v. MURPHY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 161. Argued January 30, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Even if the making of a government survey, which .could be made without any material injury to soil
Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville
KNOXVILLE WATER COMPANY v. KNOXVILLE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 212. Argued March 13, 1903. Decided March 23, 1903. The Knoxville Water Company was incorporated to construct waterworks near Knoxville with pow
Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Williamson
EASTERN BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. WILLIAMSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 152. Argued January 28, 1903. Decided March 23, 1903. Courts of one State do not take judicial notice of the laws of another
Hennessy v. Richardson Drug Co.
HENNESSY v. RICHARDSON DRUG COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 203. Argued March 12, 1903. Decided March 23, 1903. An averment in a bill that the complainants are “ all.of Cognac in
Kokomo Fence Machine Co. v. Kitselman
KOKOMO FENCE MACHINE COMPANY v. KITSELMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 148. Argued January 22, 1903. Decided March 23, 1903. Where the patents sued on are not pioneer patents and do not embody a p
Kimbell v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Co.
No. 623. Charles B. Kimbell et al., Petitioners, v. Chicago Hydraulic Press Brick Company et al. March 16, 1903. Mr. Edmund H. Smalley for petitioners. . Mr. Edward Cunningham, Jr., and Mr. Edward C. EUot for respondents.
Moss v. Glenn
No. 197. Hunter H. Moss, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Ellis Glenn. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia. Argued and submitted March 11, 1903. Decided March
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.