Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Southern Railway Co. v. Hubbard Bros.
No. 635. Southern Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Hubbard Brothers & Co. March 25, 1907. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. W. A. Henderson, Mr. Caruthers Ewing
Rochester Railway Co. v. City of Rochester
ROCHESTER RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF ROCHESTER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 156. Argued January 14, 15, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. Although the obligations of a legislative contract granting immunity from the
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
EMPIRE STATE-IDAHO MINING AND DEVELOPING COMPANY v. HANLEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. No. 206. Argued February 1, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. In a suit in the Circuit Court of the Unite
Moore v. McGuire
MOORE v. McGUIRE. APPEAL FÍJ.OM THE CIRCUIT -COURT OF THE UNITER STATES' FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 222. Argued March 1, 4, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. Where the bill is brought in the Circuit Court to quiet, and remove a c
Hiscock v. Mertens
HISCOCK, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. MERTENS. certiorAri to the circuit court of appeals for the second ’ . CIRCUIT’. No. 209. Argued February 27, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. The provisions in § 70a of the. bankruptcy act of 1898, that a ba
Love v. Flahive
LOVE v. FLAHIVE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA! No. 236. Submitted March 8, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. In a contest over a homestead entry, whether there was a sale and whether the thing sold was or was not the tract
Davidson Steamship Co. v. United States
DAVIDSON STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 220. Argued March 1, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. Where negligence is a mere question of fact and nothing appears which is negl
Tindle v. Birkett
TINDLE v. BIRKETT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 217. Argued February 28, 1907. Decided March 25, 1907. Where a claim is founded upon an open account or upon a contract, express or implied, and can be proved under
Shea v. City of Mobile
No. 620. Thomas J. Shea, Petitioner, v. City of Mobile. March 18, 1907. Petition for a writ of certiorari, to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Harry T. Smith and Mr. Gregory L. Smith for petitione
Cherry v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
No. 234. Charles T. Cherry, Receiver, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. The Fidelity and Deposit Company. In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. Argued March 13 and 14,1907. Decided March 18, 1907. Mr. R. M. Campbell, Mr. D.
Urquhart v. Brown
URQUHART, SHERIFF, v. BROWN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No 226. Argued March 7, 1907. Decided March 18, 1907. Although the power exists and will be exercised in cases of great
Tracy v. Ginzberg
TRACY v. GINZBERG. ERROR TO THE SUFREME JUDICIAL típURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 204. Argued February 26, 1907. Decided March 18, 1907. The,decision of a state court involving nothing more than the ownership of property, with all
United States v. Mitchell
UNITED STATES v. MITCHELL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 180. Argued January 25, 1907. Decided March 18, 1907. Section .7 of the act of April 26,1898, 30 Stat. 364, was not enacted to give increased pay for the discharge of the ordin
Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
No. 568. Continental Paper Bag Company, Petitioner, v. Eastern Paper Bag Company. March 11, 1907. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted. Mr. Albert H. Walker for petiti
Lawson v. Washington
No. 221. O. V. Lawson, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Washington. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Argued for defendant in error March 1, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. Mr. F. B. Crosthwaite for plaintiff in err
Wetmore v. Karrick
WETMORE v. KARRICK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 144. Argued January 9, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. Where an action is brought to recover upon a judgment the jurisdiction of the court rendering the judgme
Martin v. District of Columbia
MARTIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. BRANDENBURG v. SAME. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 190, 391. Argued January 29, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. Constitutional rights like others are matters of degree and a st
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaght
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SLAGHT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 153. Submitted January 11, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. Decided on authority of Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaght, ante, p. 122. Mr
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaght
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SLAGHT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 152. Argued January 11, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. A judgment on demurrer is as conclusive as one rendered upon proof. The question as
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 188. Argued January 28, 29, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. The rule that prior negotiations are merged in the contract is general in its nature and does not precl
Delamater v. South Dakota
DELAMATER v. SOUTH DAKOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 149. Argued January 10, 11, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. The general power of the States to control and regulate, within their borders, the business of
Perovich v. United States
PEROVICH v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE THIRD DIVISION OF THE TERRITORY OF ALASKA. No. 405. Submitted January 29, 1907. Decided March 11, 1907. While in this case there'was no witness to the homic
Bright v. Fifth Congregational Church
No. 574. Robert S. Bright, Trustee, Petitioner, v. The Fifth Congregational Church of Washington, D. C. March 4, 1907. Petition for. a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Mr. Héber J. May and Mr. S
In re Chanler
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of John Armstrong Chanler, Petitioner. Submitted February 25, 1907. Decided March 4, 1907. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of prohibition denied. Mr. George W. Watt and Mr. James M. Doha
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.