Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Norfolk & Suburban Turnpike Co. v. Virginia
NORFOLK & SUBURBAN TURNPIKE COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF. APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 962. Submitted April 8, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. Although a State may not be named as a party in the o
Creswill v. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias of Georgia
CRESWILL v. GRAND LODGE KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. No. 235. Argued May 2, 3, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. Where defendant sets up the claim that it enjoys right or privilege sought to bo enjoined u
Merchants & Miners' Transportation Co. v. United States
No. 1143. The Merchants & Miners’ Transportation Company, Petitioner, v. The United States. June 7, 1912. Mr. Samuel B. Adams and Mr.. Daniel H. Ilayne for the petitioner. The Attorney General and :The Solicitor General for the respondent.
Pickford v. Talbott
PICKFORD v. TALBOTT. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF'APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 512. Argued April 29, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. In. order to warrant a court of equity in restraining the enforcement of a judgment at law, the defeate
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE’ DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 716. Argued April 30, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Public policy' requires that the mail be carrie
Henderson v. Mayer
HENDERSON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF BURNS, v. MAYER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 219. Argued April 19, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. The provisions of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 preventing preferences
Murphy v. California
MURPHY v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 204. Argued March 11, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. While the Fourteenth Amendment protects the citizen in his right to e
Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. WAGNER ELECTRIC AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 179. Argued March 1, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Where the infringer has so
Eastern Cherokees v. United States
EASTERN CHEROKEES v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 234. Argued April 30, May 1, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. In rendering a judgment for the Cherokee Nation in its suit against the United títates, on the item claimed by
Shulthis v. McDougal
SHULTHIS v. McDOUGAL. BERRYHILL v. SHULTHIS. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 156, 157. Argued January 23, 24, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Where a petition of intervention is entertained and disposed of
Savage v. Jones
SAVAGE v. JONES, STATE CHEMIST OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA^ No. 68. Argued January 18, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Where appellant, as complainant below, attacked a
David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of America
DAVID LUPTON’S SONS COMPANY v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF AMERICA. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 137. Argued December 20, 1911. Decided June 7, 1912. Where the trial in the Circuit Court
Low Wah Suey v. Backus
LOW WAH SUEY v. BACKUS, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 869. Argued April 30, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Congress may pass laws forbidding aliens
Zeckendorf v. Steinfeld
ZECKENDORF v. STEINFELD. STEINFELD v. ZECKENDORF. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. Nos. 139, 140. Argued March 15, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. One of the parties interested in and having control of a mining compan
City of Louisville v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
CITY OF LOUISVILLE v. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 761. Argued March 7, 8, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Quaere, and not determined, whe
Glasgow v. Moyer
GLASGOW v. MOYER, WARDEN OF THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT ATLANTA, GEORGIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT • OF GEORGIA. No. 1123. Argued May 13, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. The writ of hab
Johnson v. United States
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1075. Argued May 1, 2, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Whether the prisoner was properly arraigned is not a matter of form but of substance
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION AND THE UNITED STATES v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. No. 719. Argued January 12, 15, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. An i
Hooker v. Knapp
HOOKER v. KNAPP ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. EAGLE WHITE LEAD COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE. COURT. Nos. 773, 774. Argued January 11, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912.
Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, CINCINNATI, HAMILTON & DAYTON RAILWAY COMPANY, ET AL. ■APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. No. 780. Argued January 11, 12, 1912. Decided June 7,
Railroad Commission of Mississippi v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 903. Submitted May 13, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912.
Darnell v. Illinois Central Railroad
R. J. DARNELL (INCORPORATED) v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 887. Submitted April 1, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. Under § 5 of the act of 1891,
Messenger v. Anderson
MESSENGER v. ANDERSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 150. Argued January 19, 22, 1912. Decided June 2, 1912. Where the Circuit Court of Appeals has before it in the second trial of the same case, a wi
Lawton v. Carpenter
No. 1124. A. W. Lawton, Petitioner, v. N. Leslie Carpenter et al., etc. May 27, 1912. Mr. Joseph A. McCullough Sind Mr. William Garrard for the. petitioner. Mr. Joseph É. Johnson for the respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.