Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States ex rel. Zimmerspitz v. Prentis
No. 911. The United States ex rel. Sali Zimmerspitz, Appellant, v. P. L. Prentis et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Submitted April 11, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. Mr. Benjami
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOYD. APPEAL PROM ,THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 11, 12, 1912. Decided April 28, 1913. A corporation acquiring stock control of ,a railroad company and leasin
Andrews v. Partridge
ANDREWS, EXECUTRIX, v. PARTRIDGE, TRUSTEE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 496. Argued March 13, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. Burlingham v. Grouse, tinte, p. 459, and Everett v. Judson, ante, p. 474, f
Everett v. Judson
EVERETT, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF JUDSON, v. JUDSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 595. Argued March 13, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. Burlingham v. Crouse, ante, p. 459, followed to effec'. that und
Burlingham v. Crouse
BURLINGHAM ET AL., TRUSTEES OF McINTYRE & COMPANY, v. CROUSE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 184. Argued March 12, 13, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. In construing a general reference to property in the
Johnson v. United States
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES • FOR THE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 715. Argued April 11, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. Courts proceed step by. step. Matter of Harris, 221 U. S'- 274,
Madera Water Works v. Madera
MADERA WATER WORKS v. MADERA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 229. Argued April 17, 18, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. If the. constitution of the State authorizes municipalitie
Bradford v. United States
BRADFORD v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 571. Submitted March 24, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. One convicted of fraud in- obtaining patents to public lands filed a petition for pardon which was granted on condition t
Jordan v. Roche
JORDAN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. ROCHE. SAME v. ROSS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT 05' APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 202, 203. Argued April 15, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. Bay rum imported from Porto Rico subsequent
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Moore
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. MOORE. error to the circuit court of appeals for the fifth CIRCUIT. No. 609. Argued December 3, 1912. Decided April 28, 1913. Where this court finds nothing giving rise to a clear conviction that error has resul
Ex parte Dante
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF DANTE, COLLECTOR OF THE ESTATE OF HUTCHINS. IN MANDAMUS. No. 15. Argued April 14, 1913. Decided April 28, 1913. The rules of the Court of. Appeals of the District of Columbia were promulgated in pursuance .of powe
Winters v. United States
No. 1039. A. M. Winters, Petitioner, v. The United States. April 21, 1913. Mr. Carr W. Taylor for the petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Denison for the respondent.
Gleason v. Thaw
No. 1052. John B. Gleason, Petitioner, v. Harry K. Thaw. April 21, 1913. Mr. John B. Gleason pro se. No appearance for the respondent.
Slocum v. New York Life Insurance
SLOCUM v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 20. Argued April 26, 1912. Decided April 21, 1913. Where a life insurance policy plainly provides for payment of the stipulated prem
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Stewart
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STEWART. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 205. Submitted March 20, 1913. Decided April 21, 1913. A charge that a railway is.bound to use ordinary care to light its station
Michigan Trust Co. v. Ferry
MICHIGAN TRUST COMPANY v. FERRY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.' Nos. 200, 201. Argued March 20, 1913 Decided April 21, 1913. While ordinarily jurisdiction over a person is based on the power of the sover
Strang v. Edson
No. 1023. William B. Strang, Petitioner, v. J. A. Edson. April 14, 1913. Mr. Justin D. Bowersock for the petitioner. Mr. S. W. Moore for the respondent.
Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.
REXFORD v. BRUNSWICK-BALKE-COLLENDER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued March 14, 1913. Decided April 14, 1913. The disqualification under §3 of the Court of Appeals 'Act of 1891 aris
Lieng v. Quia
SY JOC LIENG v. GREGORIO SY QUIA. APPEAL FROM THE 'SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 177. Argued March 7, 10, 1913. Decided April 14, 1913. Every presumption is in favor of the validity of a marriage where the marital relations h
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
CONSOLIDATED TURNPIKE COMPANY v. NORFOLK & OCEAN VIEW RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. No. 152. Argued January 28, 29, 1913. Decided April 14, 1913. Under § 237 of the Judicial Code, as under
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Harvey
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, v. HARVEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 204. Argued March 20, 1913. Decided April 14, 1913. In Texas, the common-law rule as to risks assumed by the employé has . been qua
McGowan v. Parish
McGOWAN, EXECUTRIX OF McGOWAN, v. PARISH, EXECUTRIX OF PARISH. IN THE MATTER OP THE APPLICATION POR ALLOWANCE OP AN APPEAL PROM A DECREE OP THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. —. Submitted January 13, 1913. Decided April 1
Welch Manufacturing Co. v. Young
No. 1019. Welch Manufacturing Company, Petitioner, v. Samuel D. Young, Trustee. April 7, 1913. Mr. Fred L. Chappell and Mr.Wm. S. Hodges for the petitioner. Mr. Nathan Heard and Mr. Chas. E. Riordan for the respondent.
McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven Railroad
McCOACH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. MINEHILL & SCHUYLKILL HAVEN RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD .CIRCUIT. ' ' No. 670. Argued January 14, 15, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The corporation tax
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.