Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
MacLeod v. United States
MacLEOD v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 259. Argued April 25, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. The.local government of a conquered county being destroyed, the conqueror may set up its own authority and-make .rules ah dere
Portland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission
PORTLAND RAILWAY, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OREGON (NO. 2). ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 120. Argued May 1, 2, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. 57 Oregon, 126, affirmed, on the authority of the
Portland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission
PORTLAND RAILWAY, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OREGON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. No. 119. Argued May 1, 2, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. A construction by the state court that the equality provis
National Safe Deposit, Savings & Trust Co. v. Hibbs
NATIONAL SAFE DEPOSIT, SAVINGS AND TRUST COMPANY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HIBBS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 79. Argued April 14, 15, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. A bank’s trusted agent, in gross bre
Adams v. Russell
ADAMS v. RUSSELL, WARDEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 1048. Submitted May 12, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. This court will not review the judgment of the state court when it rests not only on Federal, but also o
Wheeler v. City & County of Denver
WHEELER v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 473. Argued January 7, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. The fact that the plaintiff in a taxpayer’s suit against a muni
Railroad Commission v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 335. Submitted May 8, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. It is the essential character of the commerce, not
Citizens' Telephone Co. v. Fuller
CITIZENS' TELEPHONE COMPANY OF JACKSON v. FULLER, AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES, POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 285. Argued May 2, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. Decide
Citizens' Telephone Co. v. Fuller
CITIZENS’ TELEPHONE COMPANY OF GRAND RAPIDS v. FULLER, AUDITOR-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT .OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT ■ OF 'MICHIGAN. No. 284. Argued May 2, 1913. Decided June 10, 191
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brown
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 230. Argued April 18, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. Where the case is within the class which it was the purpose of
Lewis Publishing Co. v. Morgan
LEWIS PUBLISHING COMPANY v. MORGAN, POSTMASTER IN NEW YORK CITY. JOURNAL OF COMMERCE AND COMMERCIAL BULLETIN v. BURLESON, POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT. OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRI
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. McWhirter
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. McWHIRTER. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY: No. 541. Argued December 4, 1912. Decided June 10, 1913. Where the ease was decided on the Federal question, the fact
Robertson v. Howard
ROBERTSON v. HOWARD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 320. Submitted May 7, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. This court follows the ruling of the state court on the question whether contracts between the purchaser and the
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
UNITED STATES v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR 'THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 118. Argued October 19, 20, 1911. Decided June 10, 1913. A judgment dismissing, on the meri
Simpson v. Shepard
THE MINNESOTA RATE CASES. SIMPSON ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v. SHEPARD. SAME v. KENNEDY. SAME v. SHILLABER. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF M
Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
OMAHA & COUNCIL BLUFFS STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL prom the united states commerce court. No. 458. Argued February 19, 20, 1912. — Decided June 9, 1913. The meaning of the Act to Regulate Commerce and wh
Fourche River Lumber Co. v. Bryant Lumber Co.
FOURCHE RIVER LUMBER COMPANY v. BRYANT LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 296. Argued May 6, 1913. — Decided June 9, 1913. Carriers, whether saw-mill companies or railroads or both combined, cannot purc
Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
MORRISDALE COAL COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 207. Argued April 15, 1913. — Decided June 9, 1913. Without preliminary action by the Interstate Commerce Commissi
Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
MITCHELL COAL AND COKE COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 674. Submitted December 4, 1912. — Decided June 9, 1913. Pennsylvania Railroad C
Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. INTERNATIONAL COAL MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14. Argued February 27, 28, 1912. Reargued November 4, 1912.— Decided June 9, 1913. Under the Act to Regula
District of Columbia v. Petty
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. PETTY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 316. Argued May 8, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. Sureties on the official bond of a public officer are not, in the absence of statutory provisions,
Wilkinson v. McKimmie
WILKINSON v. McKIMMIE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 273. Argued May 1, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. A court of equity looks to substance rather than to form. Whether the contract of the principal has been so
Woon v. Oregon
LEM WOON v. STATE OF OREGON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 261. Submitted April 25, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. The “due process of law” clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require the State to adopt the ins
Campbell v. Northwest Eckington Improvement Co.
CAMPBELL v. NORTHWEST ECKINGTON IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 251. Argued April 23, 24, 1913. Decided June 9, 1913. A deed for an undivided interest in unimproved real estate heavily
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.