Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Sherman & Sons Co.
UNITED STATES v. SHERMAN & SONS COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 541. Argued December 17, 18, 1914. Decided April 5, 1915. The Government will not allow foreign goods to be brought into this
Eastern Railway Co. v. Littlefield
EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO v. LITTLEFIELD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 320. Submitted March 1, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. Penna. R. R. v. Puritan Mining Co., ante, p. 121, followed to effect that under
Chapman v. Zobelein
CHAPMAN v. ZOBELEIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 200. Submitted March 11, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. An issue as to the invalidity of a tax levy merely because excessive does not raise a Federal question. A
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. PURITAN COAL MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ■ PENNSYLVANIA. No. 76. Argued November 11, 1914. Decided April 5, 1915. Section 8 .of the Act to Regulate Commerce gives the shipper a
Guffey v. Smith
GUFFEY v. SUSANNAH SMITH. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 87. Argued December 2, 3, 1914. Decided April 5, 1915. Decided on authority of Guffey v. Smith, ante, p. 101. The facts are stated in the opin
Guffey v. Smith
GUFFEY v. JAMES A. SMITH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 86. Argued December 2, 3, 1914. Decided April 5, 1915. Under the settled rule of decision in Illinois an oil and gas lease like that involved
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Maxwell
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. MAXWELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE "STATE OF TENNESSEE.' No. 181. Submitted March 8, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. Under the Act to Regulate Commerce the duly filed tariff of the carrier mus
Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
ROBINSON v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE COUET OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 167. Argued March 3, 4, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. In a suit for personal injuries under the Employers’ Liability Act, a contr
United States v. Noble
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NOBLE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 127. Argued March 1, 2, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. The Quapaw Indians are still under National .tutelage; the guardianship of the Unit
South Carolina ex rel. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. McMaster
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, EX REL. PHOENIX MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. McMASTER, AS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, EX REL. SHERFESEE v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOU
Sligh v. Kirkwood
SLIGH v. KIRKWOOD, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP FLORIDA. No. 185. Argued March 9, 10, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. It is within, the police power of the State to make it a criminal offense to
Henkel v. United States
HENKEL v. UNITED STATES. ERROR'TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 142. Argued January 20, 21,1915. Decided April 5, 1915. There is no question of the authority of the United States to devote the Indian lands involved
Smoot v. United States
SMOOT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 208. Argued March 18, 19, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. A letter from the Government engineer in charge to a contractor, who had, under written contract with the United States, agr
New Orleans Tax Payers' Protective Ass'n v. Sewerage & Water Board
NEW ORLEANS TAX PAYERS’ PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 192. Argued March, 11, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. The fact that water used for drinking a
United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.
UNITED STATES v. EMERY, BIRD, THAYER REALTY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 117. Argued January 12, 13, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. The District Court, sitting as a Court
Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United States
THAMES AND MERSEY MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 616. Argued January 13, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. United States v. Hvoslef
United States v. Hvoslef
UNITED STATES v. HVOSLEF. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 331. Argued January 13, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. Under Par. 20, of § 24, of the Judicial Code, the Court of Claims ha
W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.
W. S. TYLER COMPANY v. LUDLOW-SAYLOR WIRE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND PETITION EOK CEKTIORAKI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 441, 622. Argued December 16, 1914; petition for writ of certi
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Spring River Stone Co.
ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SPRING RIVER STONE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SPRINGFIELD COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 158. Submitted January 27, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. Where the shipper has paid full freight c
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Hower
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOWER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 88. Submitted November 11, 1914 Decided March 22, 1915. Bona fide purchase is an affirmative defense which the grantee must set Up in order
Dalton Adding Machine Co. v. State Corp. Commission of Virginia
DALTON ADDING MACHINE COMPANY v. THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 190. Submitted March 8, 1915. Decided March 22,
Davis v. Virginia
DAVIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 184. Argued March 9, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. The business of taking in one State orders for portraits made in another State is inte
Newman v. Lynchburg Investment Corp.
NEWMAN ET AL., COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v. LYNCHBURG INVESTMENT CORPORATION. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 163. Argued March 3, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. The fact that a statute re
Wright v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
WRIGHT, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF GEORGIA, v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 162. Argued January 29, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. Wright v. Central Ry. of Georg
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.