Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Producers Oil Co. v. Hanzen
PRODUCERS OIL COMPANY v. HANZEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 165. Submitted March 3, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. The effect of riparian rights, attached to land conveyed by patent of the United States, depends
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Murphy
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MURPHY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 791. Argued April 23, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. Although the shipper may be in control of the car and may be negligent in regard
Woodward v. de Graffenried
WOODWARD v. de GRAFFENRIED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 164. Submitted February 25, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. In an action to determine by what law the beneficiaries of a Creek allotment are to be determined
Illinois Central Railroad v. Mulberry Hill Coal Co.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. MULBERRY HILL COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 118. Argued January 14, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. A state statute which merely requires a railroad company to furni
Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Ferebee
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. FEREBEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 779. Argued April 23, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. In the courts of North Carolina in an action under the Employers’ Liability Act,
McDonald v. Pless
McDONALD AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. PLESS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 283. Argued May 13, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. The Conformity Act — Rev. Stat., § 914 — does not app
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Carr
NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. CARR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 257. Argued May 4, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. During the same day railroad employés ofte
Geneva Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.
GENEVA FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. S. KARPEN & BROS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 496. Submitted December 17, 1914. Decided June 14, 1915. Where the plaintiff really m
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MITCHELL COAL & COKE COMPANY. EEBOB TO THE STJPEEME COTJET OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 287. Argued May 14, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. There being nothing in the record to show that any of the shipmen
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Conarty
ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY v. CONARTY, ADMINISTRATRIX. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS; No. 166. Submitted March 3, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. Where a duty is imposed for the protection of persons, in p
Virginia v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. No. 2. Original. Argued April 27, 28, 29, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. This controversy being one between States, referred .to this court in reliance upon the honor and constitu
Adams Express Co. v. Kentucky
ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WHITLEY COUNTY, STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 271. Argued May 10, 11, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. The first resort, with a view to ascertaining the meaning of a stat
Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. Real Estate Trust Co.
WASHINGTON-VIRGINIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. REAL ESTATE TRUST COMPANY OF PHILADELPHIA. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 212. Argued April 29, 30, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. Whether
Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Railroad Commission
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC RAILWAY & LIGHT COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 233. Argued April 20, 21, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. Where the fixing of rates does not impair the o
Des Moines Gas Co. v. City of Des Moines
DES MOINES GAS COMPANY v. CITY OF DES MOINES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP IOWA. No. 75. Argued November 10, 11, 1914. Decided June 14, 1915. The public authority is presumed to have acted
Perryman v. Woodward
PERRYMAN v. WOODWARD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 277. Argued May 12, 13, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. The Townsite Commission of Muskogee Creek Nation Indian Territory awarded a lot to the party having the poss
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Pennsylvania
EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DAUPHIN COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. ' No. 263. Argued May 5, 6, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. A State may tax lif
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co.
UNITED SURETY COMPANY v. AMERICAN FRUIT PRODUCT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 203. Submitted May 12, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. The right given to this court by the sixth clause of § 250, Judicial
Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. Atcherley
KAPIOLANI ESTATE, LIMITED, v. ATCHERLEY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 174. Argued April 30, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. A decree was made in 1855, by the Hawaiian court having jurisdiction, to the effect th
Herrmann v. Edwards
HERRMANN v. EDWARDS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 222. Argued April 14, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. The rule that, in the absence of diversity of citizenship, jurisdiction of
Welles v. Bryant
No. 812. W. G. Welles et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. George E. Bryant. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. Motion to dismiss or affirm and for damages submitted May 17, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. Mr. Benjamin Micou for
McMicking v. Schields
McMICKING v. SCHIELDS. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP- THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 285. Submitted May 12, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. General Order No. 58, of April 23,1900, amended the Philippine Code of Criminal Procedure, and gave the
Pyle v. Texas Transport & Terminal Co.
PYLE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF STEELE, MILLER & COMPANY, v. TEXAS TRANSPORT & TERMINAL COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 226, 227, 228, 229, 230. Argued April 16, 19, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915.
United States v. Rabinowich
UNITED STATES v. RABINOWICH. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 748. Argued April 7, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. A conspiracy, having for its object the commission of an offense denou
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.