Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Daniels v. Merrithew
DANIELS v. MERRITHEW. SAME v. SACKVILLE. SAME v. MESERVEY. SAME v. JOHNSON. SAME v. MANNING. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 237, 238, 245, 246, 247. Argued April 21, 22, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. Dec
Daniels v. Johnston
DANIELS v. JOHNSTON. SAME v. BUTLER. SAME v. CONNOR. SAME v. DINEEN. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 234, 235, 236, 240. Argued April 21, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. Decided on the authority of Daniels
Daniels v. Wagner
DANIELS v. WAGNER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 239. Argued April 21, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. Under the Forest Act of June 4, 1897, c. 2, 30 Stat. 36, one whose land was included in a forest reserv
Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. Green
SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE ROYAL ARCANUM v. GREEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 106. Argued December 8, 9, 1914. Decided June 1, 1915. Where the trial court refuses to hold that the rights of the parties were to be d
Longpre v. Diaz
LONGPRE v. DIAZ. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 51. Submitted March 15, 1915. Decided June 1, 1915. Under the law of Porto Rico as it was in 1892 a widow and guardian ad litem, had no authority to give
Collins v. Johnston
COLLINS v. JOHNSTON, WARDEN OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 594. Argued February 25, 1915. Decided May 17, 1915. In habeas corpus proceedings t
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Tilghman
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. TILGHMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 713. Argued April 22, 23, 1915. Decided May 17, 1915. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act rejects the common-law rule that contributory n
Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. Whitley
SPOKANE AND INLAND EMPIRE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WHITLEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IDAHO. No. 206. Argued March 18, 1915. Decided May 17, 1915. Decedent, who met his death in Idaho from the wrongful act of defendant railroad
Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. United States
BOOTH-KELLY LUMBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE 'CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 258. Argued May 4, 5, 1915. Decided May 17, 1915. Judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeal cancelling patents for timber lands
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co.
HEALY v. SEA GULL SPECIALTY CO. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES -FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. No. 253. Argued May 3, 1915. Decided May 17, 1915. Where it appears from the plaintiff’s statement that his case is
State Savings & Commercial Bank v. Anderson
No. 267. State Savings & Commercial Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. Alden Anderson et al. In error to the- Supreme Court of the State of California. Argued May 6, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. Mr'. C. M. Jennings and Mr. Arthur Crane for the pla
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co.
STATE OF GEORGIA v. TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY AND DUCKTOWN SULPHUR, COPPER & IRON COMPANY, LIMITED. MOTION TO ENTER A FINAL DECREE AGAINST THE DUCK-TOWN SULPHUR, COPPER & IRON COMPANY, LIMITED. No. 1, Original. Argued April 6, 7, 1915. Decid
Parker v. McLain
PARKER v. McLAIN, EXECUTRIX OF McLAIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 220. Submitted April 14, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. In order to give this court jurisdiction to review the judgment of a state court under § 237,
Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.
CUMBERLAND GLASS MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. De WITT AND COMPANY. ERROR TO COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 191. Argued March 10, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. A plea of former judgment in a Federal court adjudicating a right of Fe
Ellis v. Interstate Commerce Commission
ELLIS v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 712. Argued April 12, 15, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. The definition of transportation in § 1 of the Act
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Keystone Elevator & Warehouse Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. KEYSTONE ELEVATOR AND WAREHOUSE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 683. Argued April 24, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. In a suit against a carrier for services for handling g
Erie Railroad v. Solomon
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. SOLOMON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 559. Argued February 24, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. Writ of error to review the judgment of a state court, in an action for personal injuries based on t
United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
UNITED STATES v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 630. Argued January 7, 8, 1915. Decided May 10, 1915. Railroad yards belonging to the same railroad but
Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works
COE v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP FLORIDA. No. 140. Submitted January 20, 1915. Decided May 3, 1915. Where the case was tried twice below and twice went to the highest court of the State and the Fede
United States v. Erie Railroad
UNITED STATES v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY. error to the united states circuit court of appeals FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 580. Argued December 18, 1915. Decided May 3, 1915. Railroad yards belonging to the same railroad but several miles apart
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Gray
CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GRAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 232. Argued April 19, 20, 1915. Decided May 3, 1915. This court will not express an opinion on the question of whether or not the tr
Booth v. Indiana
BOOTH v. STATE OF INDIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP INDIANA. No. 231. Argued April 19, 1915. Decided May 3, 1915. As the police power of the State extends to regulating coal mining, it cannot be limited by moments of time
Bruner Oil Co. v. Deming Investment Co.
No. 252. The Bruner Oil Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Deming Investment Company. In . error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted April 22, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. Mr. George S. Ramsey and Mr. Edgar A.
Export & Import Lumber Co. v. Port Banga Lumber Co.
EXPORT AND IMPORT LUMBER COMPANY v. PORT BANGA LUMBER COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS.' No. 686. Argued March 15, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. Where the jurisdiction of this court depends on the amount invo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.