Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pigeon v. Buck
PIGEON v. BUCK. ROBERTS v. UNDERWOOD. ERROR TO-THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 199. Argued March 12, 15, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. No. 275. Submitted March 15, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. McDougal v. McKay, ante, p. 37
McDougal v. McKay
McDOUGAL v. McKAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 676. Argued April 14, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. In construing an Act of Congress, its known purpose must be effectuated as nearly as may be. This court will not
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Popplar
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY v. POPPLAR, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR to the supreme court of the state of MINNESOTA. No. 223. Submitted April 14, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. In this case the court finds no ground for
Doran v. Kennedy
DORAN v. KENNEDY. ERROR' TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. ' No. 224. Argued April 16, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. Where the homesteader has made final proof before his death and become entitled to the patent, his heirs unde
Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.
STEWART MINING COMPANY v. ONTARIO MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO! THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF.IDAHO. No. 205. Argued March 17, 18, 1915. Decided April 26, 1915. The locator of a mining claim has the right under § 2322, Rev. Stat., to the su
Carlisle v. South Dakota
No. 249. C. L. Carlisle, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of South Dakota. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Dakota. - Submitted April 16, 1915. Decided April 19, 1915. Mr. Melvin Grigsby for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Ch
Rounds v. Cloverport Foundry & Machine Co.
ROUNDS v. CLOVERPORT FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 669. Submitted February 23, 1915. Decided April 19, 1915. In an action in personam the state court has jurisdiction to issue an au
Frank v. Mangum
FRANK v. MANGUM, SHERIFF OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA. No. 775. Argued February 25, 26, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. Petitioner was formally indicted fo
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 183. Argued March 9, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. Where the jurisdiction of the District Court t
McGowan v. Parish
McGOWAN v. PARISH. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OE APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 150. Argued January 25, 26, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. The appellate jurisdiction of this court in all cases coming from the Court of Appeals of the Dis
New York ex rel. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. Sohmer
STATE OF NEW YORK, EX REL. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY v. SOHMER, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 129. Argued January 18, 19, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. An exemption f
Greenleaf Johnson Lumber Co. v. Garrison
GREENLEAF JOHNSON LUMBER COMPANY v. GARRISON, SECRETARY OF WAR. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 678. Argued February 24, 25, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. The power of the sovereign State or Nation is pe
Christie v. United States
CHRISTIE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 204. Argued March 16, 17, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. Where there is a deceptive representation.in the specifications as to the material to be excavated which actually mislea
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Railroad Commission
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WISCONSIN. No. 198. Argued March 12, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. Where an order of a state railroad commission r
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Marcus
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MARCUS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 790. Submitted March 1, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. A corporation created by an act of Congress has an inherent right to invoke th
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hill
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HILL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 482. Submitted March 1, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. A corporation created by an act of Congress is inherently entitled to invoke the
Southern Pacific Co. v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAR FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 202. Submitted March 11, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. Where a railroad company transports property and troops of the United States over a continuous line of ra
United States ex rel. Chott v. Ewing
UNITED STATES EX REL. CHOTT v. EWING, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 194. Argued March 10, 11, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. The provisions of the Judicial Code in regard to the juris
Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. Menefee
RIVERSIDE AND DAN RIVER COTTON MILLS v. MENEFEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. ' No. 169. Argued March 4, 1915. Decided April 12, 1915. To condemn without á hearing is repugnant to the due process clause of the
Detroit Trust Co. v. Pontiac Savings Bank
DETROIT TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF COATES, v. PONTIAC SAVINGS BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR .THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 173. Argued March 5, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. The law of Michigan, as it was in 1903,
Malloy v. South Carolina
MALLOY v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 172. Argued March 5, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. The constitutional inhibition on ex post facto laws was intended to secure substantial perso
Reinman v. City of Little Rock
REINMAN v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 153. Argued January 22, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. The decision of the state court of last resort that a municipal ordinance is within the scope of t
Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co.
KNAPP v. ALEXANDER-EDGAR LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE’CIRCUIT COURT OF BAYFIELD COUNTY, STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 139. Submitted January 18, 1915. Decided April 5, 1915. An entryman’s interest prior to aGtual possession is more than mere colo
American Surety Co. v. Shulz
AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SHULZ. ERROR to the district court of the united states FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 643. Argued February 23, 1915 Decided April 5, 1915. Under § 24, Judicial Cpde, the District Court has
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.