Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. McWhirt
CHICAGO & ALTON RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. McWHIRT. ERROR TQ THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 714. Argued January 29, 30, 1917. Decided March 26, 1917. A provision in the special charter of a railroad company permitting the g
California v. Deseret Water, Oil & Irrigation Co.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. DESERET WATER, OIL & IRRIGATION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 269. Argued January 29, 1917. — Decided March 26, 1917. When the decision of the state court in the application of st
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. United States of America & Interstate Commerce Commission
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE. DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 733. Argued March 15, 1917. — Decided March 26
Tillinghast v. Richards
No. 652. Frank W. Tillinghast, Leonard L. Barber, and Sam A. Fenner, Appellants, v. John J. Richards, Marshal of the United States for the District of Rhode Island. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Rho
Zavaglia v. Notarbartolo
No. 226. Francesco Massari Zavaglia, Plaintiff in Error, v. Emanuela Notarbartolo. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 6, 1917. Decided March 19, 1917. Mr. Henry L. Lazarus, M
Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY. BEAVER RIVER POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. BEAVER RIVER POWER COMPANY. NUNN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. NUNN ET AL. A
Wilson v. New
WILSON, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, v. NEW ET AL., RECEIVERS OF THE MISSOURI, OKLAHOMA & GULF RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 79
Diaz v. Porto Rico
No. 381. No. 382. Ramon Pastor Diaz, Plaintiff in Error, v. People of Porto Rico; and Luis Abella and Pedro G. Goico, Plaintiffs in Error, v. People of Porto Rico. In error to the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. Motion to dismiss or affirm sub
United States v. Cress
UNITED STATES v. CRESS. UNITED STATES v. KELLY ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 84, 718. Argued December 13, 1916. Decided March 12, 1917. The servitude to the interests of n
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Shaw
No. 454. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., Plaintiff in Error, v. John B. Shaw. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Submitted January 30, 1917. Decided March 6, 1917. Mr. E. L. Worthington, Mr. W. D. Cochran and Mr. LeWright
Ex parte Wintner
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Samuel Wintner, Petitioner. Submitted January 29, 1917. Decided March 6, 1917. Mr. Harold Remington for petitioner.
Wyoming v. Colorado
STATE OF WYOMING v. STATE OF COLORADO ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 7, Original. Argued December 6, 7, 8, 1916. — Order entered March 6, 1917. It is ordered that this case be restored to the docket for re-argument. 1. Counsel are requested to speci
St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co. v. Moore
ST. JOSEPH & GRAND ISLAND RAILWAY COMPANY v. MOORE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 573. Argued January 30, 1917. Decided March 6, 1917. An action governed by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act is not removable fr
McAllister v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
McALLISTER, ADMINISTRATRIX OF McALLISTER, v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No. 748. Submitted January 30, 1917. Decided March 6, 1917. An orde
Memphis Street Railway Co. v. Moore
MEMPHIS STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. MOORE, ADMINISTRATOR OF DOUGLAS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 623. Argued January 29, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. Where no conflict with the Federal Constitution
Lie v. San Francisco & Portland Steamship Co.
LIE, MASTER OF THE NORWEGIAN STEAMSHIP “SELJA,” &c. v. SAN FRANCISCO & PORTLAND STEAMSHIP COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE AMERICAN STEAMSHIP “BEAVER,” &c. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the NINTH 'CIRCUIT. No. 110. Argued December
Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.
SWIFT & COMPANY v. HOCKING VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 376. Argued December 5, 1916. — Decided March 6, 1917. A railroad company, under a written' agreement reserving a small annual rental an
Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co.
PEASE v. RATHBUN-JONES ENGINEERING COMPANY. PEASE ET AL. v. RATHBUN-JONES ENGINEERING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 360, 419. Submitted January 8, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. Objection go
Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of Cincinnati
PENNINGTON v. FOURTH NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI, OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 147. Argued January 26, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. The power’of the States to seize tangible and intangible property and apply
Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbin
PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY COMPANY v. McKIBBIN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 136. Argued January 25, 1917. Decided March 6, 1917. In the absence of consent, a corporation of
Rome Railway & Light Co. v. Floyd County
ROME RAILWAY & LIGHT COMPANY v. FLOYD COUNTY, GEORGIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA. No. 547. Argued January 25, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. A street railway company in G
Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co.
GRAYS HARBOR LOGGING COMPANY ET AL. v. COATS-FORDNEY LOGGING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 132. Argued January 23, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. In a proceeding to condemn land for a private railway, b
Horn v. Mitchell
HORN v. MITCHELL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 679. Argued January 11, 12, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917. A judgment of the.District Court refus
Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington
MOUNTAIN TIMBER COMPANY v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 13. Argued March 1, 2, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916; reargued January 30, 1917. — Decided March 6, 1917.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.