Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Farmers Irrigation District v. Nebraska ex rel. O'Shea
FARMERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT ET AL. v. STATE OF NEBRASKA ON THE RELATION OF O’SHEA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 215. Submitted April 25, 1917. Decided June 4, 1917. Under § 3438 of the Revised Statutes of Nebrask
Erie Railroad v. Purucker
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. PURUCKER, ADMINISTRATRIX OF MARIETTA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF RICHLAND COUNTY, STATE OF OHIO. No. 211. Argued April 23, 1917. Decided June 4, 1917. A request to charge must be calculated to give the jury an
Saunders v. Shaw
SAUNDERS v. SHAW AND THE BOARD OF DRAINAGE COMMISSIONERS OF THE BAYOU TERRE-AUX-BOEUFS DRAINAGE DISTRICT ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 472. Argued May 9, 1917. Decided June 4, 1917. It is a violation of du
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Blackwell
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. BLACKWELL. ERROR to the court op appeals op the state op GEORGIA. No. 213. Submitted April 24, 1917. Decided June 4, 1917. That provision of the “Blow-Post” law of Georgia (Civil Code, 1910, §§ 2675-2677), which
Doepel v. Jones
DOEPEL ET AL., HEIRS AT LAW OF FEARNOW, v. JONES ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 571. Argued May 8, 1917. Decided June 4, 1917. A preliminary homestead entry, made in the Territory of Oklahoma under agreement
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
CUYAHOGA RIVER POWER COMPANY v. NORTHERN REALTY COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 342. Argued May 8, 9, 1917. Decided June 4, 1917. The Supreme Court of Ohio, after refusing to review a
Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Carter
No. 849. Prairie Oil & Gas Company, Senes W. Anthony, and Charles Anthony, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Annie Carter. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Motion to dismiss submitted May 7, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Mr. Jose
Cardona v. Porto Rico
Nos. 832, 833, and 834. Mateo Fajardo Cardona, Plaintiff in Error, v. People of Porto Rico. In error to the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 7, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Mr. Willis Sweet for plaintiff
Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. United States
Nos. 878 and 879. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Motion to dismiss submitted May 7, 1917. Decided M
Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.
HART STEEL COMPANY ET AL. v. RAILROAD SUPPLY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE, CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. . No. 67. Argued April 17, 18, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. A patent owner sued for infringement in two circuits, the
Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.
RAILROAD SUPPLY COMPANY v. ELYRIA IRON & STEEL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 95. Argued April 17, 18, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The following patents, viz., No. 538,809, of May 7, 1895, No.
Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Chatman
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. CHATMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 192. Argued April 20, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Under the doctrine established by Railroad Company v. Lockwood, 17 Wall. 357,
Hamer v. New York Railways Co.
HAMER ET AL. v. NEW YORK RAILWAYS COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 968. Argued April 10, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. With the delivery of a mortgage to secure bond
United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.
UNITED COPPER SECURITIES COMPANY ET AL. v. AMALGAMATED COPPER COMPANY ET AL. error to the circuit court of appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 208. Argued April 24, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The established principles limiting the right o
Sutton v. New Jersey
SUTTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY. MIHM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP ERRORS AND APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW JERSEY. Nos. 189, 190. Argued April 20, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. A state law requiring a street car company to carry
Clyde Steamship Co. v. Walker
CLYDE STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. WALKER. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIED JUDICIAL DEPAETMENT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 281. Argued February 28, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916; reargued January
Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. JENSEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 280. Argued February 28, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916; reargued Januar
Valley Steamship Co. v. Wattawa
VALLEY STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. WATTAWA. VALLEY STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. MRAZ. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF OHIO, Nos. 469, 470. Argued January 10, 11, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. It being settled that in the abse
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Taber
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. TABER, GUARDIAN OF SMALL ET AL. ERROR TO TEtE SUPREME .COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 760. Submitted April 10, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The claim that the Federal Employers’ Liability Act should h
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. McGrew Coal Co.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. McGREW COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 222. Argued April 26, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. The court is not called upon to consider state statutes passed for the enfor
Smith v. Third National Exchange Bank
SMITH ET AL. v. THIRD NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK OF SANDUSKY, OHIO, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. No. 214. Argued April 24, 25, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Where lands, allotted as part of a Mexican community gra
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Barlow
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. BARLOW. error to the supreme court op the STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 194. Argued April 20, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. An employee is not engaged in interstate commerce, within the .meaning of the Federal Emplo
Lane v. Hoglund
LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. HOGLUND. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 365. Argued April 11, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917. Section 7 of the Act of March 3,1891, e. 561, 26 Stat. 1095, 1099, lays upon the S
Erie Railroad v. Winfield
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WINFIELD. ERROR TO TÚE COURT OF ERRORS AND. APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 353. Argued March 1, 1916; restored to docket for reargument November 13, 1916; reargued February 1, 2, 1917. Decided May 21, 1917.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.