Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gee Woe v. United States
No. 533. Gee Woe v. United States. October 28, 1918. Mr. W. J. Waguespack for petitioner. Mr. A.ssistant to the Attorney General Todd and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Porter for the United States.
Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.
No. 675. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Company v. Seaboard Fisheries Company, Claimant, etc. October 28, 1918. Mr. J: Parker Kirlin, Mr. John M. Woolsey and Mr. F. C. Nicodemus, Jr., for petitioner.. Mr. Royall Victor for respondent.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Ward
No. 639. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company et al. v. Fred Ward. October 28, 1918. Mr. R. J. Roberts, Mr. C. O. Blake, Mr. W. H. Moore, Mr. Thomas P. Littlepage, Mr. Sidney A. Taliaferro and Mr. W. F. Dickinson for petitioners.
United States v. Reynolds
No. 591. United States v. Suda Reynolds. October 28, 1918. The Solicitor General for the United States. Mr. Jesse D. Lydick for respondent.
Rederiaktiebolaget Atlanten v. Aktieselskabet Korn-Og Foderstof Kompagniet
No. 567. Rederiaktiebolaget Atlanten v. Aktieselskabet Korn-Og Foderstof Kompagniet. October 28, 1918. Mr. John W. Griffin for petitioner. Mr. Roscoe H. Hupper for respondent.
McGowan v. Eagle Cliff Fishing Co.
No. 133. H. S. McGowan et al. v. Eagle Cliff Fishing Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. October 21, 1918. Mr. Franklin T. Griffith and Mr. Bert W. Henry for plaintiffs in error. Mr. G. C. Fulton and Mr. C. W. Fulton
Holt v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias
No. 39. Joseph Holt et al. v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. October 21, 1918. Mr. Elmer H. Adams, Mr. Henry L. Lazarus and Mr. David Sessler for appellants. Mr. Sol H. E
Connolly v. Diamond
No. 518. Lawrence F. Connolly, Administrator, etc., et al. v. Celia Diamond et al. October 21, 1918. Mr. Charles W. Beale for petitioners. No appearance for respondents.
Gulfport Towing Co. v. Ollinger & Bruce Dry Dock Co.
No. 489. Gulfport Towing Company, Claimant, etc., v. Ollinger & Bruce Dry Dock Company. October 21, 1918. Mr. Palmer Pillans for petitioner. Mr. Harry T. Smith for respondent.
Black Mountain Railway Co. v. Mumpower
No. 478. Black Mountain Railway Company v. Leona Mumpower, Administratrix, etc. October 21, 1918. Mr. Murray Allen and Mr. J. W. Pless for petitioner. Mr. A. Hall Johnston for respondent.
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Brown
No. 442. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Alice Frances Brown et al. October 21, 1918. Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Mr. Francis I. Gowen, Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. John Hampton Barnes for petitioner. Mr. William A. Glasgow, Jr., and Mr. T.
Kinzell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway
No. 485. William Kinzell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway. October 21, 1918. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho granted. Mr. John P. Gray and Mr. Patrick H. Loughran for petitioner. Mr. Rema
In re Coon
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Charles W. Coon, Petitioner. Submitted October 8, 1918. Decided October 21, 1918. Mr. Charles W. Coon pro se.
Jacket v. United Thacker Coal Co.
No. 135. Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Company et al. v. United Thacker Coal Company. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 8, 1918. Decided Oct
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'n
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. MINNEAPOLIS CIVIC AND COMMERCE ASSOCIATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 283. Argued May 1, 2, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. Two railroad companies, between
Aikins v. Kingsbury
AIKINS v. KINGSBURY, AS REGISTER OF THE STATE LAND OFFICE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME. COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 265. Submitted April 25, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. By the law as it was when he bought, a purchaser of state lands in
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Solum
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOLUM. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MONARCH ELEVATOR COMPANY. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DULUTH ELEVATOR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Nos. 205, 206, 526.
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of Newport
POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE COMPANY v. CITY OF NEWPORT, KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 273. Argued January 18, 21, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. This court, will review and correct the error of a state supre
Arkansas v. Tennessee
STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE. INTERLOCUTORY DECREE. IN EQUITY. No. 4. Orignal. Entered June 10, 1918. Defining the. principles determining the boundary between Arkansas- and Tennessee in accordance with the previous opinion and d
Jim Butler Tonopah Mining Co. v. West End Consolidated Mining Co.
JIM BUTLER TONOPAH MINING COMPANY v. WEST END CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. No. 249. Argued March 26, 27, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. The end lines of a lode mining claim, in the sense of t
Exploration Co. v. United States
EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 277. Argued May 1, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. Statutes of limitation upon suits to set aside fraudulent transactio
Grinnell Washing Machine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.
GRINNELL WASHING MACHINE COMPANY v. E. E. JOHNSON COMPANY. CERTIORARI. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 272. Argued April 26, 29, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. Patent' No. 950,402, granted to W. F. Phillips, for a
Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States
TOLEDO NEWSPAPER COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 371. Argued March 7, 8, 1918. Decided June 10, 1918. A summary conviction for criminal contempt is not within
Ex parte Kitzerow
No. -. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of George O. Kitzerow, Petitioner. Submitted May 20, 1918. Decided June 3, 1918. Mr. Frank T. Boesel for petitioner.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.