Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1918 Cases
299 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Weitzel
UNITED STATES v. WEITZEL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 567. Argued March 7, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. Section 5209, Rev. Stats., punishing embezzlements and false entries by
United States v. Soldana
UNITED STATES v. SOLDANA ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, No. 325. Argued March 4, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. In view of restrictions and conditions for the protection of. the Indians c
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Holloway
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. HOLLOWAY, ADMINISTRATOR OF HOLLOWAY. EEEOB TO THE COUET OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 209. Submitted March 15, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. In an action under the' Employers’ Liability
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. United States
BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 191. Argued March 15, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. Having given bond to secure a contract with the Navy Department, claimant paid premiums after alleged complia
United States v. Schider
UNITED STATES v. SCHIDER, TRADING AS “JOS. L. SCHIDER & CO.” ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 468. Argued March 6, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. Within the general terms of the Food
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. United States
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 250. Argued March 27, 28, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. The. “28 Hour Law,” forbidding interstate railroads fro
General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia ex rel. State Corp. Commission
GENERAL RAILWAY SIGNAL COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AT THE RELATION OF THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 177. Argued March 11, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. A foreig
Dalton Adding Machine Co. v. Virginia ex rel. State Corp. Commission
DALTON ADDING MACHINE COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AT THE RELATION OF THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 176. Argued March 11, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. A materia
Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United States
MANUFACTURERS RAILWAY COMPANY AND ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. MANUFACTURERS RAILWAY COMPANY AND ANHEUSER-BUSCH BREWING ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMER
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota
CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPBEME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 32. Argued April 26, 1917. Decided April 15, 1918. In so far as the property, tangible and intangible, constituting a freight car line,
Salt Lake Investment Co. v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
SALT LAKE INVESTMENT COMPANY v. OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE’ OP UTAH. No. 29. Argued March 8, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. Lands within the limits of an incorporated city, whether actually oc
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Piper
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. PIPER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF VERMONT. No. 208. Submitted March 14, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. A stipulation in the Uniform Live Stock Contract, filed by the carrier with the Interstate Comm
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. Village of Clara City
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. VILLAGE OF CLARA CITY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 185. Submitted March 12, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. Railroad companies may be required,
International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Anderson County
INTERNATIONAL & GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. ANDERSON COUNTY ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS, SIXTH SUPREME ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OP THE STATE OP TEXAS; No. 243. Argued March 25, 26, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. With
City of Covington v. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co.
CITY OF COVINGTON v. SOUTH COVINGTON & CINCINNATI STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED . STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 225. Argued March 19, 20, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. A grant of “al
City of Mitchell v. Dakota Central Telephone Co.
CITY OF MITCHELL v. DAKOTA CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 198. Argued March 15, 18, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. The District Court has jurisdiction over
Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San Francisco
SPRING VALLEY WATER COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR ■'*' NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 211. Argued March 19, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. Money placed in a bank as special deposits, purs
Smith v. Jackson
SMITH, AUDITOR OF THE PANAMA CANAL, v. JACKSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 457. Argued March 6, 7, 1918. Decided April 15, 1918. The Auditor for the Canal Zone has no authority to make deductions for re
Cooper Grocery Co. v. Penland
No. 906. Cooper Grocery Company, Petitioner, v. G. H. Penland, Trustee, etc. April 1, 1918. Mr. B. Y. Cummings for petitioner. Mr. Charles A. Boynton and Mr. James D. Williamson for respondent.
Sandberg v. McDonald
No. 935. Erik Sandberg et al., Petitioners, v. John McDonald, Claimant, etc. April 1, 1918. Mr. Alex. T. Howard and Mr. J. W. Waguespack for petitioners. Mr. Palmer Pillans for respondent.
New York Life Insurance v. Dodge
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DODGE. ERROR TO THE SPRINGFIELD COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATS OF MISSOURI. No. 378. Argued January 21, 1918. Decided April 1, 1918. A law of a State, governing a life insurance contract made locally betwee
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. St. Paul Ass'n of Commerce
No. 262. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. St. Paul Association of Commerce et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. March 28, 1918. Mr. Asa G. Briggs, Mr. E. C. Bindley, Mr
Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons of Mississippi v. Vicksburg Lodge, No. 26
No. 871. Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of Mississippi et al., Petitioners, v. Vicksburg Lodge, No. 26, of Free and Accepted Masons et al. March 25, 1918. Mr. Robert B. Mayes for petitioners. Mr. J. C. Bryson for respo
Moss v. Moore
No. 232. H. A. Moss and J. F. Bradford, Plaintiffs in Error, v. C. C. Moore et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. Argued March 21, 1918. Decided March 25, 1918. Mr. A. E. Shaw, for plaintiffs in error, submitted.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.